10,463
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Global Health Beyond 2015

Inequity in India: the case of maternal and reproductive health

, , , &
Article: 19145 | Received 16 Jul 2012, Accepted 15 Jan 2013, Published online: 02 Apr 2013
 

Abstract

Background

Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 5 is focused on reducing maternal mortality and achieving universal access to reproductive health care. India has made extensive efforts to achieve MDG 5 and in some regions much progress has been achieved. Progress has been uneven and inequitable however, and many women still lack access to maternal and reproductive health care.

Objective

In this review, a framework developed by the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) is used to categorize and explain determinants of inequity in maternal and reproductive health in India.

Design

A review of peer-reviewed, published literature was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed and Popline. The search was performed using a carefully developed list of search terms designed to capture published papers from India on: 1) maternal and reproductive health, and 2) equity, including disadvantaged populations. A matrix was developed to sort the relevant information, which was extracted and categorized based on the CSDH framework. In this way, the main sources of inequity in maternal and reproductive health in India and their inter-relationships were determined.

Results

Five main structural determinants emerged from the analysis as important in understanding equity in India: economic status, gender, education, social status (registered caste or tribe), and age (adolescents). These five determinants were found to be closely interrelated, a feature which was reflected in the literature.

Conclusion

In India, economic status, gender, and social status are all closely interrelated when influencing use of and access to maternal and reproductive health care. Appropriate attention should be given to how these social determinants interplay in generating and sustaining inequity when designing policies and programs to reach equitable progress toward improved maternal and reproductive health.

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted as a part of the EPI-4 project, which is funded by a grant from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study.