110
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Focus: ADHD, Depression, Pain, and Neurological Disorders

Exploring the Impact of Once-Daily OROS® Methylphenidate (MPH) on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with ADHD Transitioning from Immediate-Release MPH

, MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , PhD, , MSc (Psych), MSc (Math) & , MD, PhD
Pages 27-38 | Published online: 13 Mar 2015
 

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the clinical and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in children/adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who required a therapy switch from immediate-release (IR) methylphenidate (MPH) and were initiated on Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS®) MPH. Methods: Prospective, noninterventional study including patients (aged 6–18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of ADHD who transitioned from IR MPH to OROS® MPH based on medical needs. Patients were transitioned to OROS® MPH and were followed for 12 weeks. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms, functional outcomes, HRQoL, and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Results: 598 patients entered the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean OROS® MPH starting dose was 29.5 ± 12.0 mg/day, increasing slightly to 33.5 ± 13.2 mg/day at final visit. Compared with baseline, there were significant (all P < 0.0001) symptomatic, functional, and HRQoL improvements after transitioning from IR MPH to OROS® MPH as assessed by the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (from 29.0 ± 10.5 to 19.5 ± 11.1), Children's Global Assessment Scale (by 11.0 ± 13.3), and Inventory for Assessing Quality of Life (ILC) LQ0–28 scores (parents' rating from 17.2 ± 3.9 to 19.4 ± 4.0; patients' rating from 18.7 ± 4.0 to 20.5 ± 3.9). Overall, no significant changes in quality of sleep or appetite were observed. More than 70% of parents and physicians rated the effectiveness of OROS® MPH as at least “good” and were at least “satisfied” with OROS® MPH. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were insomnia and anorexia. No clinically relevant changes in body weight or vital signs were observed. Conclusions: In this naturalistic setting, transitioning from IR MPH to OROS® MPH, in patients who showed previously insufficient response and/or poor tolerability, was successful. Patients' and parents' HRQoL as well as burden of disease showed a clinically relevant improvement. OROS® MPH was generally safe and well tolerated.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.