2,318
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Paper

Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae at Direct Addition or Pre-incubation on in Vitro Gas Production Kinetics and Degradability of Four Fibrous Feeds

, , , , , & show all
Article: 3075 | Received 20 Aug 2013, Accepted 22 Feb 2014, Published online: 17 Feb 2016

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on in vitro gas production (GP) kinetics and degradability of corn stover, oat straw, sugarcane bagasse and sorghum straw. Feedstuffs were incubated with different doses of yeast [0, 4, 8 and 12 mg/g dry matter (DM)] at direct addition or 72 h pre-incubation. Rumen GP was recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 30, 48, 54 and 72 h of incubation. After 72 h, rumen pH and methane were determined and contents were filtrated for DM, neutral (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) degradability. Fibrous species×method of application×yeast interactions occurred (P< 0.001) for all measured ruminal GP parameters and degradability. The direct addition or 72 h pre-incubation of S. cerevisiae with corn stover improved (P< 0.05) GP and methane and decreased (P< 0.05) the lag time (L) and NDF degradability (NDFD). The direct addition of S. cerevisiae to oat straw increased (P< 0.05) rate of GP (c) and decreased (P< 0.05) asymptotic GP (b). However, 72 h pre-incubation increased (P< 0.05) c with linearly decreased b, DM degradability (DMD) and NDFD. Applying S. cerevisiae for 72 h pre-incubation decreased (P< 0.001) methane emission. The direct addition or 72 h pre-incubation of S. cerevisiae to sorghum straw increased (P< 0.05) b, c, L, DMD and NDFD. Overall, the effect of dose varied among different feedstuffs and different application methods. Results suggested that the direct addition of S. cerevisiae could support and improve ruminal fermentation of low-quality forages at 4 to 12 g/kg DM.

Introduction

Direct-fed microbial offer a great potential for manipulation of ruminal fermentation and Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an especially attractive organism. S. cerevisiae addition was reported to increase nutritional value of poor quality forages. S. cerevisiae have the ability to increase dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestion (Carro et al., Citation1992), increase initial rates of fibre digestion (Williams et al., Citation1991). Numerous studies (Kumar et al., Citation2013; Pinloche et al., Citation2013) documented positive effects of yeast, not only on the rumen environment, but also on the improvement of microbial activities. S. cerevisiae supplementation leads to increase in the number of total anaerobic and cellulolytic bacteria (Newbold et al., Citation1996; Jouany, Citation2001). Saccharomyces cerevisiae can provide the rumen with important nutrients and nutritional cofactors in addition to vitamins such as biotin and thiamine, which reported to be required for microbial growth and activity (Callaway and Martin, Citation1997; Mao et al., Citation2013).

Many reports illustrated that administration of yeast is paralleled with increased gas production (GP). Many studies suggested that S. cerevisiae might stimulate the acetogens to compete or co-metabolise hydrogen with methanogens, thereby reducing CH4 emissions (Hristov et al., Citation2013). However, others reported increased CH4 production (Martin et al., Citation1989; Martin and Nisbet, Citation1990), while Mathieu et al. (Citation1996) reported no effects. These conflicting results on CH4 production are likely due to strain difference of S. cerevisiae and type of diets (Patra, Citation2012). Supplementing diets with S. cerevisiae were shown to increase total volatile fatty acids (VFA) and propionic acid production (Mao et al., Citation2013). S. cerevisiae can enhance fungal colonisation of plant cell walls leading for increased DM and NDF digestion (Patra, Citation2012), increased initial rate of fibre digestion (Williams et al., Citation1991), improved in situ crude protein (CP) and NDF degradation.

Many methods can be used to S. cerevisiae administration. Most products contain a mixture of varying proportions of live and dead S. cerevisiae cells. Those with a predominance of live cells are sold as live yeasts, while others containing more dead cells and the growth medium are sold as S. cerevisiae. Hence, the method of S. cerevisiae administration may affect the potential response. The response depends on number of live or metabolically active yeast cells have shown to have a greater effect in stimulating rumen fermentation (Dawson et al., Citation1990). Direct-fed microbial are often recommended in various European countries than other administration methods (Doreau and Jouany, Citation1998).

The aim of this study was to determine effects of increasing doses of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in two methods of applications (direct or 72 h of pre-incubation) on in vitro GP, degradability and some ruminal fermentation parameters of the fibrous feed-stuffs of corn stover, oat straw, sugarcane bagasse, and sorghum straw.

Materials and methods

Fibrous feed species and yeast product levels

Three individual samples of each of the fibrous feeds corn stover, oat straw, sugarcane bagasse, and sorghum straw were randomly and manually harvested in triplicate from different sites in the State of Mexico. Samples were dried at 60°C for 48 h in a forced air oven to constant weight, ground in a Wiley mill to pass a 1 mm sieve and stored in plastic bags for subsequent determination of chemical components and in vitro GP. Four levels of commercial yeast product (Saccharomyces cerevisiae I-1077, LEVUCELL® SC20; Lalleland, Montréal, QC, Canada) contain 1×1010 per gram yeast product. Doses of yeast were (/g DM): control (0 mg), low (4 mg), medium (8 mg) and high (12 mg). Feed samples were incubated with yeast doses that were added into the bottles immediately before incubation (direct method) or 72 h pre-incubated at room temperature. Stock solution of each yeast product doses was prepared before treatments in distilled water in order to get the suitable doses in each 1 mL of the stock solution.

In vitro incubations

Rumen inoculum was collected from two Brown Swiss cows (400 to 450 kg body weight) fitted with permanent rumen cannula. Cows were fed ad libitum a total mixed ration made up of 50:50 commercial concentrate (PURINA®, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing (g/kg) 147.3 CP, 160.4 NDF, 27.7 acid detergent fibre (ADF). Alfalfa hay was formulated to meet all of their nutrient requirements (National Research Council, Citation2001). Fresh water was available to cows at all times during the rumen inoculum collection phase.

Ruminal contents from each cow was obtained before the morning feeding, flushed with CO2, then mixed and strained through four layers of cheesecloth into a flask with O2 free headspace. Samples (1 g) of each feed were weighed into 120 mL serum bottles with appropriate addition of S. cerevisiae doses/g DM. Consequently, 10 mL of particle free ruminal fluid was added to each bottle followed by 40 mL of the buffer solution according to Goering and Van Soest (Citation1970), with no trypticase added, in a 1:4 (v/v) proportion.

During incubations, it was used 4 feedstuffs of 3 individual samples of each with the 4 doses of S. cerevisiae in 2 application methods (direct addition or 72 h pre-treatments) of S. cerevisiae and 4 bottles (replicates) were used for each incubated sample during 3 runs of incubation. Once all bottles were filled, they were immediately closed with rubber stoppers, shaken and placed in the incubator at 39°C. The volume of gas produced was recorded at times of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 24, 30, 48, 54 and 72 h of incubation using the pressure reading technique (Extech instruments, Waltham, MA, USA) of Theodorou et al. (Citation1994). At the end of incubation (i.e. 72 h), bottles were uncapped, pH was measured using a pH meter (Conductronic pH15; Conductronic, Puebla, Mexico) and the contents of each bottle were filtered to obtain the non-fermented residue for determination of degraded substrate. After recording the final gas volume (i.e., 72 h), 2 mL of NaOH (10 M) were added to each bottles and gas pressure was determined immediately. Mixing of the contents with NaOH allowed absorption of CO2, with the gas volume remaining in the head space of bottles considered to be CH4 (Demeyer et al., Citation1988).

Degradability and sample analysis

At the end of incubation (i.e. 72 h), the contents of each serum bottle were filtered under vacuum through glass crucibles with a sintered filter (coarse porosity no. 1, pore size 100 to 160 µm; Pyrex, Stone, UK). Fermentation residues were dried at 105°C overnight to estimate DM disappearance with loss in weight after drying being the measure of undegradable DM. The NDF and ADF were calculated in the residues after DM degradability (DMD) determinations for establishing NDF and ADF degradability. Neutral detergent fibre was assayed without use of an alpha amylase but with sodium sulfite in the NDF. Both NDF and ADF are expressed without residual ash. Neutral detergent fibre and ADF were also determined in the residues samples after incubations for NDF and ADF degradability. Samples of the feeds were analysed for DM (#934.01), ash (#942.05), nitrogen (#954.01) and ether extract (#920.39) according to AOAC (Citation1997). The NDF (Van Soest et al., Citation1991), ADF, and lignin (AOAC, Citation1997; #973.18) analyses used an ANKOM200 Fibre Analyser Unit (ANKOM Technology Corp., Macedon, NY, USA).

Calculations and statistical analyses

All the calculations were mentioned and descripted before in Salem (Citation2012) as in the following.

Kinetic parameters of GP were estimated (mL/g DM) by fitted data in the NLIN option of SAS (Citation2002) according to France et al. (Citation2000) as:

A=b×(1-e-c(t-L))

where A is the volume of GP at time t; b is the asymptotic GP (mL/g DM); c is the rate of GP (/h), and L (h) is the discrete lag time prior to gas production.

Metabolisable energy (ME; MJ/kg DM) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (OMD; g/kg OM) were estimated according to Menke et al. (Citation1979) as:

ME=2.20+0.136 GP (mL/0.5 g DM)+0.057 CP (g/kg DM) OMD=148.8+8.89 GP+4.5 CP (g/kg DM)+0.651 ash (g/kg DM) where GP is net GP in mL from 200 mg of dry sample after 24 h of incubation.

The partitioning factor at 24 h of incubation (PF24; a measure of fermentation efficiency) was calculated as the ratio of DMD in vitro (mg) to the volume (mL) of GP at 72 h (i.e., DMD/total gas production (GP96) according to Blümmel et al. (Citation1997). Gas yield (GY24) was calculated as the volume of gas (mL gas/g DM) produced after 24 h of incubation divided by the amount of DMD (g) as:

Gas yield (GY24)=mL gas/g DM/g DMD

Short chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were calculated according to Getachew et al. (Citation2002) as:

SCFA (mmol/200 mg DM)=0.0222 GP-0.00425

where GP is the 24 h net gas production (mL/200 mg DM).

The experimental design for the in vitro ruminal GP, degradability and fermentation parameters analysis was a completely random design considering, as fixed factors, type of forage (S) and S. cerevisiae level (C) in the linear model (Steel et al., Citation1997) within each method (M) of application (direct or pre-incubation). Data of each of the three runs within the same sample were averaged prior to statistical analysis. Mean values of each individual sample within each species (three samples of each) were used as the experimental unit. The statistical model was:

Yijklm=µ+ Sj+Ck+Ml+(S×C)jk+(S×M)jl+ (M×C)lk+(S×M×C)jkl+Eijklm

where Yijk=is every observation of the ith fibrous species (Si) when incubated in the jth yeast (Cj; S. cerevisiae); µ is the general mean; Si (i=1-4) is the feed effect; Cj is the yeast dose effect (j=1-4); Mj is the application method (j=1-2), (S*C)ij is the interaction between feed and yeast dose; (S*M)jl is the interaction between feed and application methods; (S*M*C)jkl is the interaction between the three variable study (feed, yeast and application method); and Eijklm is experimental error. Linear and quadratic polynomial contrasts were used to examine responses of feeds to increasing addition levels of the S. cerevisiae.

Results

The chemical composition varied between different species. Corn stover had higher (P< 0.05) CP content with low (P< 0.05) content of ADF and NDF fractions. Oat and sorghum straws had the highest (P<0.05) ADF and NDF fractions contents with low (P<0.05) content of CP ().

Fibrous species×method of application×S. cerevisiae interaction occurred (P< 0.0001) for b, c, L, GP, CH4 production, ME, SCFA, GY24 and PF24 ( and ).

Effect of fibrous species

Gas production parameters were varied (P< 0.001) between different fibrous species. Corn stover and oat straw improved the asymptotic gas production with increasing of the initial delay before GP beginning followed by sorghum straw and sugarcane baggas which had the rate of GP increased. During the first 14 h of incubation, sugarcane baggas improved (P< 0.001) in vitro GP followed by corn stover where oat straw had the lowest (P< 0.001). After 14 h of incubation, corn stover and sugarcane bagass improved (P< 0.001) in vitro GP followed by oat straw, while sorghum straw had the lowest (P< 0.001). After 24 h of incubation only corn stover showed a gas production higher (P< 0.001) than oat and sorghum straw (P< 0.001), while sugarcane baggas did not improve gas production compared to the straws (). Oat straw, sugarcane baggas, and sorghum straw had both ruminal pH (P= 0.006) and GY24 (P< 0.001) increased with lowering (P< 0.001) PF24 value compared to corn stover. Corn stover had DMD, OMD, ME, SCFA, and PF24 values improved (P< 0.001). On the contrary, sorghum straw had the highest (P< 0.001) values of CH4, NDFD, and ADFD compared to the other feeds. Sugarcane baggas had the lowest values (P< 0.001) of CH4, NDFD, OMD, and ME, where oat straw had the lowest (P< 0.001) SCFA production compared to other feeds ().

Effect of application methods

Direct addition of S. cerevisiae improved (P< 0.001) the rate of GP with lowering (P< 0.001) the initial delay before GP beginning. The in vitro GP was also improved (P< 0.001) compared to the 72 h pre-incubation method ().

The direct addition of S. cerevisiae also improved CH4 (P= 0.047), DMD (P= 0.005), NDFD (P= 0.005), ADFD (P= 0.020), (P< 0.001) OMD, SCFA, and GY24, with lowering (P< 0.001) PF24 compared to the 72 h pre-incubation method. The method of application did not affect (P>0.05) both of the asymptotic gas production and ruminal pH ().

Effect of yeast doses

Both low and high doses of S. cerevisiae improved the asymptotic GP, with increasing S. cerevisiae doses, the rate of GP (linear, P= 0.007; quadratic, P= 0.006), the initial delay before GP beginning (quadratic, P< 0.001), and in vitro GP (linear, quadratic, P≤0.001) during the period before the first 24 h. After 24 h and up to 72 h of incubation, the highest dose of S. cerevisiae had the in vitro GP increased (linear, quadratic, P<0.001) where the lowest dose had the lowest in vitro GP compared to other doses ().

The lowest dose of S. cerevisiae improved DMD (linear, P= 0.005; quadratic, P< 0.001), and PF24 (linear, P< 0.001; quadratic, P= 0.011) with lowering (linear, quadratic, P< 0.001) ME, OMD, SCFA, and (linear, P< 0.001; quadratic, P= 0.005) GY24 compared to the other doses. In contrary, the highest dose of S. cerevisiae had the highest values of DMD, ME, OMD, and SCFA (). No effects (P>0.05) of S. cerevisiae doses on ruminal pH, CH4, and ADFD; however, addition of yeast caused a lowered (linear, P= 0.005) values for NDFD ().

Discussion

Chemical composition

The chemical composition varied between the four fibrous feeds used in our study. These variations arise from variation in the genotype of the crops, differences between production environments, and from the interaction between environment and genotypes (Welch, Citation1995; Denčić et al., Citation2011). Environmental differences will include variation in climate, the soil and agronomic practice, together with variations raised from different harvesting conditions, and post harvesting treatments (Welch, Citation1995; Elghandour et al. Citation2013). There is usually an inverse relationship between the CP and crude fibre content in a given forage species, and this has been revalidated in this study.

Table 1. Chemical composition of the four fibrous feeds.

Table 2. In vitro rumen gas kinetics of four low quality roughages as affected by the direct addition or 72 h pre-incubation with different levels of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Table 3. In vitro rumen fermentation profile of four low quality roughages as affected by the direct addition or 72 h pre-incubation with different levels of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Gas production, rumen fermentation and degradability

The responses to S. cerevisiae are fibrous species type, forage composition, application methods and dose-dependent in addition to interactions among yeast and diet (Patra, Citation2012). Gas production from different fibrous species depends on its chemical composition. In our study, during the first 24 h of incubation, sugarcane bagasse and corn stover produced more GP than sorghum and oat straw compared to the period after 24 h up to 72 where they produced more gases. The production of gases from tested roughages depends on portentous and fibrous contents of feeds (Paya et al., Citation2007). Higher GP during the first period of fermentation of both sugarcane bagasse and corn stover refers to high content of highly fermentable constituents than sorghum and oat straw. Conversely, the fermentation process of sorghum and oat straw refers to their content of low fermentable constituents. Gas production depends on nutrient availability for rumen microorganisms (Mahala and Fadel Elseed, Citation2007). Fermentation of dietary carbohydrates to acetate, propionate and butyrate produces gases in the rumen which are mainly composed of hydrogen, carbon dioxide and methane. However, fermentability of protein produces relatively small GP compared to carbohydrate fermentation (Makkar et al., Citation1995). This can explain how S. cerevisiae addition could improve GP at the time it reduced NDFD. All depends on the chemical composition of fermented feeds. Availability of nutrients for rumen microorganisms will stimulate the degradability of different nutrients (Paya et al., Citation2007). It is very important to stress that not only has the addition of S. cerevisiae the ability to improve GP, but it can also make qualitative changes in GP thereby reducing its negative effect on the environment. S. cerevisiae has the ability to decrease methane and ammonia production, and to improve fermentation efficiency to contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions (Hristov et al., Citation2013). Moreover, decreasing protein degradation and ammonia production in the rumen (Mao et al., Citation2013) has the ability to decrease the overall nitrogen excretion by the animal, which would contribute to decreased ammonia emissions from cattle manure.

There are a few data in the literature regarding the effect of S. cerevisiae method of application on in vitro gas kinetics and fermentation profile. It has been found that the method of the S. cerevisiae product application depends on number of live or metabolically active S. cerevisiae that will stimulate rumen fermentation (Dawson et al., Citation1990). Direct application of S. cerevisiae ensures the viability of S. cerevisiae cells so an improvement occur for in vitro GP and fermentation kinetics and profile compared with pre-incubation method. Pre-incubation of S. cerevisiae with different fibrous feeds may negatively affect the fermentation process which reflected on low fermentability for all fibrous species. Doreau and Jouany (Citation1998) stated that directfed microbial are often recommended in various European countries than other administration methods. Elam et al. (Citation2003) hypothesised that the initial advantages of direct-fed microbial involve a favourable alteration of the gastrointestinal micro-flora and that over time that innate immunological mechanisms of control animals provide this same function.

Improved GP with increasing S. cerevisiae doses reflects the enhanced ruminal environment. Paulus et al. (Citation2012) and Mao et al. (Citation2013) documented the positive effects of S. cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation and microbial activities. A number of specific hypothetical biochemical mechanisms have been developed to explain the stimulatory effects of S. cerevisiae in the rumen (Chevaux and Fabre, Citation2007). Some of these mechanisms have been based on the ability of yeast to provide important nutrients or nutritional cofactors that stimulate microbial activities (Callaway and Martin, Citation1997). Another suggested the ability of S. cerevisiae to scavenge excess oxygen creating a more optimal environment for rumen anaerobic bacteria (Newbold et al., Citation1996; Jouany, Citation2001). Others studies suggested that S. cerevisiae supplementation could provide vitamins such as biotin and thiamine, which are reported to be required for microbial growth and activity (Akin and Borneman, Citation1990). In addition, others suggested that S. cerevisiae can provide a focal point for the development of a stable microbial consortium (Jouany, Citation2001). In this model, the S. cerevisiae cells provide a site for metabolic exchanges and an environment that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganisms around substrates.

One possible explanation for the varied response with a different level of S. cerevisiae in this study is at least partially due to the nature of the in vitro procedure. For the in vitro model, the substrate amount relative to the rumen liquid volume is much less than in the rumen of a cow (<1 vs 12%). Therefore, when a rumen modulator like S. cerevisiae is supplemented at a different rate, it could change the fermentation rate and cause different substrate depletion, resulting in different response as the fermentation length is changed (Mao et al., Citation2013). Lila et al. (Citation2004) found variable effects of S. cerevisiae on ruminal fermentation when different substrates were used in vitro.

Decreased lag time with S. cerevisiae addition can be illustrated based on two basic mechanisms. The first mode of yeast action reported by Newbold et al. (Citation1996) is the respiratory activity that scavenges O2, which is toxic to anaerobic bacteria and causes inhibition of adhesion of cellulolytic bacteria to cellulose, and this peak in O2 concentration occurs at approximately the time of feeding (initial time). The second mode is that S. cerevisiae contains small peptides and other nutrients that required to predominant ruminal cellulolytic bacteria to initiate growth (Callaway and Martin, Citation1997).

Addition of S. cerevisiae increased SCFA production on forage substrates (Mao et al., Citation2013). Increased SCFA production and ME are associated with high activities of microbes in the rumen. S. cerevisiae produces growth factors for microbial growth that can stimulate rumen microbial growth and activity (Chiquette, Citation2009). In addition to the ability of S. cerevisiae to provide conducive conditions to microbial growth in a way that is capable of using O2 in the rumen so that the conditions of an aerobic rumen awake (Mosoni et al., Citation2007). S. cerevisiae. Newbold et al. (Citation1996), for example, used this mode of action to explain a 35% increase in total bacterial counts with S. cerevisiae in vitro.

Addition of S. cerevisiae lowered PF24 values. A lower PF24 would reflect lower conversion of degraded substrate into microbial biomass and vice versa (Harikrishna et al., Citation2012). Ruminal pH was not changed during fermentation processes. Several studies have suggested that S. cerevisiae moderate the ruminal pH by increasing lactate utilisation making pH relatively more stable and meet the needs of rumen microbes to perform its activity (Paulus et al., Citation2012).

Conclusions

The responses to supplemental S. cerevisiae varied among the fibrous species tested, the results of this study suggest that the addition of S. cerevisiae can support ruminal fermentation of low-quality forages. In general, S. cerevisiae added at 4 to 12 g/kg DM showed the greatest responses in most variables tested.

References

  • AkinD.E. BornemanW.S. 1990. Role of rumen fungi in fibre degradation. J. Dairy Sci. 73:3023-3032.
  • AOAC, 1997. Official methods of analysis. 16 th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.
  • BlümmelM. SteingssH. BeckerK. 1997. The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and 15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. Brit. J. Nutr. 77:911-921.
  • CallawayE.S. MartinS.A. 1997. Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on ruminal bacteria that utilize lactate and digest cellulose. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2035-2044.
  • CarroM.D. LebzienP. RohrK. 1992. Effects of yeast culture on rumen fermentation, digestibility and duodenal flow in dairy cows fed silage based diet. Livest. Prod. Sci. 32:219-229.
  • ChevauxE. FabreM.M. 2007. Probiotic yeast in small ruminants. Feed Mix 15:28-29.
  • ChiquetteJ. 2009. The role of probiotics in promoting dairy production. Available from: //www.wcds.ca/proc/2009/Manuscripts/RoleOfProbiotics.pdf
  • DawsonK.A. NewmanK.E. BolingJ.A. 1990. Effects of microbial supplements containing yeast and lactobacilli on roughage fed ruminal microbial activities. J. Anim. Sci. 68:3392-3398.
  • DemeyerD. De MeulemeesterM. De GraeveK. GuptaB.W. 1988. Effect of fungal treatment on nutritive value of straw. Int. S. Crop. 53:1811-1819.
  • DenčićS. MladenovN. KobiljskiB. 2011. Effects of genotype and environment on breadmaking quality in wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod. 5:71-82.
  • DoreauM. JouanyJ.P. 1998. Effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:3214-3221.
  • ElamN.A. GleghornJ.F. RiveraJ.D. GalyeanM.L. DefoorP.J. BrashearsM.M. Younts-DahlS.M. 2003. Effects of live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (strains NP45 andNP51) and Propionibacterium freudenreichii on performance, carcass, and intestinal characteristics, and Escherichia coli strain O157 shedding of finishing beef steers. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2686-2698.
  • ElghandourM.M.Y. SalemA.Z.M. RonquilloM. BórquezJ.L. GadoH.M. OdongoN.E. PeñuelasC.G. 2013. Effect of exogenous enzymes on in vitro gas production kinetics and ruminal fermentation of four fibrous feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 179:46-53.
  • FranceJ. DijkstraJ. DhanoaM.S. LópezS. BanninkA. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Brit. J. Nutr. 83:143-150.
  • GetachewG. MakkarH.P.S. BeckerK. 2002. Tropical browses: contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. J. Agr. Sci. 139:341-352.
  • GoeringM.K. Van SoestP.J. 1970. Forage fibre analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Washington, DC, USA.
  • HarikrishnaC. MahenderM. ReddyY. Ramana GnanaPrakashM. SudhakarK. PavaniM. 2012. Evaluation of in vitro gas production and nutrient digestibility of complete diets supplemented with different levels of thermo tolerant yeast in Nellore rams. Vet. World 5:477-485.
  • HristovA.N. OhJ. FirkinsJ.L. DijkstraJ. KebreabE. WaghornG. MakkarH.P. AdesoganA.T. YangW. LeeC. GerberP.J. HendersonB. TricaricoJ.M. 2013. Special topics: mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. J. Anim. Sci. 91:5045-5069.
  • JouanyJ.-P., 2001. A new look to at yeast culture as probiotics for ruminants. Feed Mix 9:17-19.
  • KumarD.S. PrasadC.S. PrasadR.M.V. 2013. Effect of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on ruminal microbial population in buffalo bulls. Buffalo Bull. 32:116-119.
  • LilaZ.A. MohammedN. YasuiT. KurokawaY. KandaS. ItabashiH. 2004. Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal micro-organism fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 82:1847-1854.
  • MahalaA.G. ElseedA.M.A. Fadel 2007. Chemical composition and in vitro gas production characteristics of six fodder trees, leaves and seeds. Res. J. Agr. Biol. Sci. 3:983-986.
  • MakkarH.P.S. BlummelM. BeckerK. 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins and their implications in gas production and true digestibility in in vitro techniques. Brit. J. Nutr. 73:897-933.
  • MaoH.L. MaoH.L. WangJ.K. LiuJ.X. YoonI. 2013. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on in vitro fermentation and microbial communities of low-quality forages and mixed diets. J. Anim. Sci. 91:3291-3298.
  • MartinS.A. NisbetD.J. 1990. Effects of Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on fermentation of amino acids and starch by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 68:2142-2149.
  • MartinS.A. NisbetD.J. DeanR.G. 1989. Influence of a commercial yeast supplement on in vitro ruminant fermentation. Nutr. Rep. Int. 40:395-403.
  • MathieuF. JouanyJ.P. SenaudJ. BohatierJ. BerthinG. MercierM. 1996. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus orizae on fermentations in the rumen of faunated and defaunated sheep; protozoal and probiotic interactions. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 36:271-287.
  • MenkeK.H. RaabL. SalewskiA. SteingassH. FritzD. SchneiderW. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agr. Sci. 93:217-222.
  • MosoniP. Chaucheyras-DurandF. Berat-MailletC. ForanoE. 2007. Quantification by real time PCR of cellulolitic bacteria in the rumen of sheeps after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates. Effect of a yeast additive. J. Appl. Microbiol. 103:2676-2685.
  • National Research Council, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  • NewboldC.J. WallaceR.J. McIntoshF.M. 1996. Mode of action of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a feed additive for ruminants. Brit. J. Nutr. 76:249-261.
  • PatraA.K. 2012. The use of live yeast products as microbial feed additives in ruminant nutrition. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 7:366-375.
  • PaulusD.M. KelzerJ.M. JaderborgJ.P. FossaM.V. MorenoM. Ruiz BelknapC. CrawfordG.I. DiCostanzoA. 2012. Effect of inclusion of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in beef cattle feedlot diets with two different sulfur concentrations on nutrient metabolism. Available from: http://www.mnbeef.umn.edu/research_reports/2012/BR1205-Paulus.pdf
  • PayaH. TaghizadehA. JanmohammadiH. MoghadamG.A. 2007. Nutrient digestibility and gas production of some tropical feeds used in ruminant diets estimated by the in vivo and in vitro gas production techniques. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2:108-113.
  • PinlocheE. McEwanN. MardenJ.-P. BayourtheC. AuclairE. NewboldC.J. 2013. The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PLoS ONE 8:e67824.
  • SalemA.Z.M. 2012. Oral administration of leaf extracts to rumen liquid donor lambs modifies in vitro gas production of other tree leaves. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 176:94-101.
  • SAS, 2002. User’s guide: statistics, version 9.0. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA.
  • SteelR.G.D. TorrieJ.H. DickeyD.A. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. McGraw Hill, New York, NY USA.
  • TheodorouM.K. WilliamsB.A. DhanoaM.S. McAllanA.B. FranceJ. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 48:185-197.
  • Van SoestP.J. RobertsonJ.B. LewisB.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
  • WelchR.W. 1995. The chemical composition of oats. in: WelchR.W. ( ed.) The oat crop: production and utilization. Chapman & Hall, London, UK pp 279-320.
  • WilliamsP.E.V. TaitC.A.G. InnesG.M. NewboldC.J. 1991. Effects of the inclusion of yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae plus growth medium) in the diet of cows on milk yield and forage degradation and fermentation patterns in the rumen of sheep and steers. J., Anim. Sci. 69:3016-3026.