95
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Content: Research Articles

Docking-Based Classification Models for Exploratory Toxicology Studies on High-Quality Estrogenic Experimental Data

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1921-1936 | Published online: 06 Oct 2015
 

Abstract

Background: The ethical and practical limitation of animal testing has recently promoted computational methods for the fast screening of huge collections of chemicals. Results: The authors derived 24 reliable docking-based classification models able to predict the estrogenic potential of a large collection of chemicals provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency. Model performances were challenged by considering AUC, EF1% (EFmax = 7.1), -LR (at sensitivity = 0.75); +LR (at sensitivity = 0.25) and 37 reference compounds comprised within the training set. Moreover, external predictions were made successfully on ten representative known estrogenic chemicals and on a set consisting of >32,000 chemicals. Conclusion: The authors demonstrate that structure-based methods, widely applied to drug discovery programs, can be fairly adapted to exploratory toxicology studies.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

O Nicolotti and GF Mangiatordi wish to acknowledge FIRB (Futuro in Ricerca 2012, RBFR12SJA8_003) and IDEA 2011 (GRBA11EB3G). E Benfenati would like to thank LIFE+ project EDESIA for funding. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

O Nicolotti and GF Mangiatordi wish to acknowledge FIRB (Futuro in Ricerca 2012, RBFR12SJA8_003) and IDEA 2011 (GRBA11EB3G). E Benfenati would like to thank LIFE+ project EDESIA for funding. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.