71
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Human Biliary Amount Prediction Using Simple, Bile Flow-Rate Corrected and Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferase Activity Corrected Allometric Methods

, &
Pages 173-182 | Received 21 Dec 2016, Accepted 11 Apr 2017, Published online: 13 Jul 2017
 

Abstract

Aim: Retrospective scaling of human biliary amounts has been performed using allometry. Methods: Human biliary excretory data for 14 drugs were predicted using simple, bile flow-rate corrected and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) activity corrected allometry methods. Allometry was performed using Y = aXb relationship with correction factors. Statistical tests consisting of fold difference (predicted/observed) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) computation were carried out. Results: UDPGT activity corrected allometry predicted higher biliary amounts in humans as compared with other methods. The RMSE values were 38, 32 and 81 for simple, bile flow-rate corrected and UDPGT activity corrected allometry, respectively. Conclusion: Although data showed the usefulness of the approaches for human biliary predictions in the decision process for nominating drug candidate(s) based on % RMSE and fold differences, for some drugs prediction appeared not satisfactory using any of the methods.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles as outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

All the authors are employees of Cadila Healthcare Limited. The authors have no conflict of interest in the preparation of this manuscript (ZRC publication no. 484). No funding was available to support the contents of the work. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

All the authors are employees of Cadila Healthcare Limited. The authors have no conflict of interest in the preparation of this manuscript (ZRC publication no. 484). No funding was available to support the contents of the work. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.