1,708
Views
106
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Basic Research Paper

Dual functions of autophagy in the response of breast tumor cells to radiation

Cytoprotective autophagy with radiation alone and cytotoxic autophagy in radiosensitization by vitamin D3

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 739-753 | Received 21 Jun 2011, Accepted 10 Jan 2012, Published online: 13 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

In MCF-7 breast tumor cells, ionizing radiation promoted autophagy that was cytoprotective; pharmacological or genetic interference with autophagy induced by radiation resulted in growth suppression and/or cell killing (primarily by apoptosis). The hormonally active form of vitamin D, 1,25D3, also promoted autophagy in irradiated MCF-7 cells, sensitized the cells to radiation and suppressed the proliferative recovery that occurs after radiation alone. 1,25D3 enhanced radiosensitivity and promoted autophagy in MCF-7 cells that overexpress Her-2/neu as well as in p53 mutant Hs578t breast tumor cells. In contrast, 1,25D3 failed to alter radiosensitivity or promote autophagy in the BT474 breast tumor cell line with low-level expression of the vitamin D receptor. Enhancement of MCF-7 cell sensitivity to radiation by 1,25D3 was not attenuated by a genetic block to autophagy due largely to the promotion of apoptosis via the collateral suppression of protective autophagy. However, MCF-7 cells were protected from the combination of 1,25D3 with radiation using a concentration of chloroquine that produced minimal sensitization to radiation alone. The current studies are consistent with the premise that while autophagy mediates a cytoprotective function in irradiated breast tumor cells, promotion of autophagy can also confer radiosensitivity by vitamin D (1,25D3). As both cytoprotective and cytotoxic autophagy can apparently be expressed in the same experimental system in response to radiation, this type of model could be utilized to distinguish biochemical, molecular and/or functional differences in these dual functions of autophagy.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by American Institute for Cancer Research Grant #06A058-REV. Molly Bristol was supported, in part, by a predoctoral training grant (W81XWH-09-1-0020) from the Department of Defense. Electron microscopy was performed at the VCU—Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy Microscopy Facility, supported, in part, with funding from NIH-NINDS Center core grant P30NS047463. The RFP-LC3 vector was generously provided by Dr. Keith Miskimins at the University of South Dakota and was originally developed by the laboratory of Dr. A.M. Tolkovsky. The MCF7/ATG7−/− cells were a generous gift from the lab of Dr. Ameeta Kelekar at University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

Notes

* Although this representative experiment appears to indicate differences in the extent of p62 degradation between IR alone and 1,25D3 + IR, densitometry analysis and pooling of the data from multiple western blots has determined that the level of p62 degradation is not significantly different between these treatments.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.