922
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

All-trans-retinoic acid antagonizes the hedgehog pathway by inducing patched

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 463-472 | Received 05 Nov 2013, Accepted 12 Jan 2014, Published online: 04 Feb 2014
 

Abstract

Male germ cell tumors (GCTs) are a model for a curable solid tumor. GCTs can differentiate into mature teratomas. Embryonal carcinomas (ECs) represent the stem cell compartment of GCTs and are the malignant counterpart to embryonic stem (ES) cells. GCTs and EC cells are useful to investigate differentiation therapy and chemotherapy response. This study explored mechanistic interactions between all-trans-retinoic acid (RA), which induces differentiation of EC and ES cells, and the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway, a regulator of self-renewal and proliferation. RA was found to induce mRNA and protein expression of Patched 1 (Ptch1), the Hh ligand receptor and negative regulator of this pathway. PTCH1 is also a target gene of Hh signaling through Smoothened (Smo) activation. Yet, this observed RA-mediated Ptch1 induction was independent of Smo. It occurred despite co-treatment with RA and Smo inhibitors. Retinoid induction of Ptch1 also occurred in other RA-responsive cancer cell lines and in normal ES cells. Notably, this enhanced Ptch1 expression was preceded by induction of the homeobox transcription factor Meis1, a direct RA target. Direct interaction between Meis1 and Ptch1 was confirmed using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. To establish the translational relevance of this work, Ptch1 expression was shown to be deregulated in human ECs relative to mature teratoma and the normal seminiferous tubule. Taken together, these findings reveal a previously unrecognized mechanism through which RA can inhibit the Hh pathway via Ptch1 induction. Engaging this pathway is a new way to repress the Hh pathway that can be translated into the cancer clinic.

10.4161/cbt.27821

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

Flow cytometry analyses were performed in the DartLab: Immunoassay and Flow Cytometry Shared Resource at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. A.B. was supported by a National Research Service Award from the National Institutes of Health (NIH, T32-CA009658) and through a fellowship from the Albert J. Ryan Foundation. E.D. is an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor supported by a generous gift from the F.M. Kirby Foundation. This work was supported in part by an American Cancer Society Institutional Grant, Prouty Multi-Investigator Award, and a grant from Uniting Against Lung Cancer with Mary Jo’s Fund to Fight Cancer (S. Freemantle) and by NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants R01-CA111422 and R01-CA062275 and by a Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation Award (E. D.). This work was supported in part from the NCI core grant 5 P30 CA023108 that supports the Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.