1,531
Views
39
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Focal adhesion kinase

An alternative focus for anti-angiogenesis therapy in ovarian cancer

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 919-929 | Received 05 Jan 2014, Accepted 13 Apr 2014, Published online: 23 Apr 2014
 

Abstract

This investigation describes the clinical significance of phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (FAK) at the major activating tyrosine site (Y397) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cells and tumor-associated endothelial cells. FAK gene amplification as a mechanism for FAK overexpression and the effects of FAK tyrosine kinase inhibitor VS-6062 on tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis were examined. FAK and phospho-FAKY397 were quantified in tumor (FAK-T; pFAK-T) and tumor-associated endothelial (FAK-endo; pFAK-endo) cell compartments of EOCs using immunostaining and qRT-PCR. Associations between expression levels and clinical variables were evaluated. Data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to correlate FAK gene copy number and expression levels in EOC specimens. The in vitro and in vivo effects of VS-6062 were assayed in preclinical models. FAK-T and pFAK-T overexpression was significantly associated with advanced stage disease and increased microvessel density (MVD). High MVD was observed in tumors with elevated endothelial cell FAK (59%) and pFAK (44%). Survival was adversely affected by FAK-T overexpression (3.03 vs 2.06 y, P = 0.004), pFAK-T (2.83 vs 1.78 y, P < 0.001), and pFAK-endo (2.33 vs 2.17 y, P = 0.005). FAK gene copy number was increased in 34% of tumors and correlated with expression levels (P < 0.001). VS-6062 significantly blocked EOC and endothelial cell migration as well as endothelial cell tube formation in vitro. VS-6062 reduced mean tumor weight by 56% (P = 0.005), tumor MVD by 40% (P = 0.0001), and extraovarian metastasis (P < 0.01) in orthotopic EOC mouse models. FAK may be a unique therapeutic target in EOC given the dual anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic potential of FAK inhibitors.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Robert R. Langley and Donna Reynolds for helpful discussions and assistance with immunohistochemistry. We would also like to recognize Nicolas Jennings who provided technical expertise in the execution of laboratory experiments. R.L.S., J.B.M., and B.Z. are supported by the NCI T32 Training Grant (CA101642). This research was funded in part by support from NIH Grants (CA110793 and CA109298), the U.T. MD Anderson Cancer Center Ovarian Cancer Spore (P50 CA083639), the Zarrow Foundation, the Betty Ann Asche Murray Distinguished Professorship and the Marcus Foundation to A.K.S., the Ann Rife Cox Chair in Gynecology to R.L.C., and NIH Grants CA-104825 and CA-140933 to S.K.L.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.