641
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Critique of the International Agency for Research on Cancer meta-analyses of the association of sunbed use with risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma

Pages 294-300 | Published online: 01 Nov 2009
 

Abstract

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reported meta-analyses of the association of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM), finding significant correlations with ever use of sunbeds and first use of sunbeds prior to age 35 years; it did not claim that the associations showed causal links. However, some observational studies in the meta-analysis included individuals in the UK with skin phenotype at increased genetic risk of CMM without adjustment for skin phenotype. Treating the five UK studies separately from the other 14 corrected this oversight. In the original study, the summary relative risk (RR) of CMM with respect to sunbed use was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.31). In this study, the similar RR was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.03-1.38). The RR for the five UK studies was 2.09 (95% CI, 1.14-3.84), whereas the RR for the other 14 studies was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.96-1.24). For first use of sunbeds prior to age 35 years, the IARC found a summary RR of 1.75 (95% CI, 1.35-2.36). This study plotted the RRs versus latitude of each study population, with a linear regression analysis carried out for all but the one UK study. The RR increased at 0.077 per degree of latitude and the regression explained 67% of the variance. It is also argued that factors other than sunbed use explain the increasing worldwide trends in CMM. Because solar-UV-simulating sunbeds induce production of vitamin D, the health benefits of their use greatly outweigh any possible risks.

Acknowledgements

I receive funding from the UV Foundation (McLean, VA), the Sunlight Research Forum (Veldhoven), and Bio-Tech-Pharmacal (Fayetteville, AR), and have received funding from the Vitamin D Society (Canada).

Figures and Tables

Figure 1 Plot of the relative risk for cutaneous melanoma versus mean latitude of those who first used sunbeds when younger than 35 years on the basis of data in Figure 2 of ref. Citation1. Data from the UK were not used in the regression analysis.

Figure 1 Plot of the relative risk for cutaneous melanoma versus mean latitude of those who first used sunbeds when younger than 35 years on the basis of data in Figure 2 of ref. Citation1. Data from the UK were not used in the regression analysis.

Table 1 Results of meta-analyses' calculations performed using various studies

Table 2 Melanoma incidence and mortality rates in the countries for which data were available for first use of sunbeds prior to age 35 yearsCitation28

Table 3 Risk-modifying factors for CMM