647
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article Addendum

Class III compensation, represented by KRP2 overexpression, depends on V-ATPase activity in proliferative cells

, , , , , & show all
Article: e27204 | Received 04 Nov 2013, Accepted 14 Nov 2013, Published online: 04 Dec 2013

Abstract

Compensation refers to an increase in cell size when the cell number is significantly decreased due to the mutation or gain of function of a gene that negatively affects the cell cycle. Given the importance of coordinated growth during organogenesis in both animal and plant systems, compensation is important to understand the mechanism of size regulation. In leaves, cell division precedes cell differentiation (which involves cell expansion); therefore, a decrease in cell number triggers enhanced cell expansion (compensated cell expansion; hereafter, CCE). Functional analyses of genes for which a loss or gain of function triggers compensation have increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the decrease in cell number. Nevertheless, the mechanisms that induce enhanced cell expansion (the link between cell cycling and expansion), as well as the cellular machinery mediating CCE, have not been characterized. We recently characterized an important pathway involved in cell enlargement in KRP2-overexpressing plants. Here, we discuss the potential role of plant KRPs in triggering enlargement in cells with meristematic features.

This article refers to:

Plant leaves are common models of size regulation due to their rather simple shape and constant size under controlled growth conditions.Citation1-Citation4 However, how the size of an organ(ism) is determined remains unclear. Plant leaves, with their relatively simple form and determinate fate, can be used to address this question. In this study, we explored the “key logics” of size regulation in plants by examining compensation.Citation5 Although the coordination between cell proliferation and expansion processes during leaf development and its impact on size control is relatively well-characterized, the cellular processes mediating cell enlargement remain unclear.Citation6-Citation10

Previously, we analyzed 8 different mutant and transgenic lines showing compensation.Citation11 A kinematic analysis of cell size during leaf development demonstrated that compensated cell expansion (CCE) occurs through 3 different mechanisms depending on the cause of the impairment in cell proliferation: an enhanced post-mitotic cell expansion rate (Class I), an extended post-mitotic cell expansion period (Class II), and an increase in size of the dividing cells (Class III).Citation11 Although the molecular nature of the first 2 classes of CCEs remains unclear, the third class, represented by KIP-RELATED PROTEIN 2 (KRP2) overexpressors (o/e), was described in our recent study.Citation12 We demonstrated that the unusually large cell size in KRP2-overexpressing plants relies on increased vacuolar type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) activity. This finding increased our understanding of the molecular nature of one major pathway mediating CCE in plant leaves.Citation12

The Arabidopsis genome is known to possess 7 KRP genes with low sequence similarities and distinct expression patterns.Citation13,Citation14 Among these genes, the individual overexpression of KRP1, KRP2, and KRP3 results in relatively dwarfed plants with strongly serrated leaves containing considerably fewer but significantly larger cells at maturity.Citation11,Citation13,Citation14,Citation15 We analyzed the cellular dynamism (i.e., cell number and size) in leaf primordia from 4 d after sowing (DAS) to leaf maturity (30 DAS).Citation11 Interestingly, in all compensation mutants analyzed to date, the actively dividing cells were similar in size to those in wild type, excluding class III observed in KRP2 o/e, in which the size of the dividing cells was 2-fold larger than in wild type.Citation11-Citation13 Based on the central and often redundant functions of plant KRPs in cell cycle regulation, similarities between plants overproducing KRP1, KRP2, and KRP3 were expected. However, the reason that a gain of function triggers an increase in cell size during the cell cycle is not understood.

After wild-type Arabidopsis plants exit mitosis, most cell types undergo a rapid increase in size (e.g., > 40-fold increase in palisade cells in terms of cell area).Citation8,Citation11 This increase in cell size is even more striking in compensation exhibiting mutants, including a ~150-fold increase in fas1–5 an3–4 double mutant cell area (7473 ± 885 µm2), if we assume that the size of the dividing cells is ~50 µm2.Citation8,Citation11 Until recently, the mechanisms mediating this enhanced cell expansion ability remained unclear.

KRP2 overproduction inhibits the G2/M phase transition, significantly decreasing cell number. This was proposed to trigger CCE during the post-mitotic stage of leaf development. However, in KRP2 o/e, the dividing cells are 2-fold larger than in wild type and all other compensation mutants analyzed.Citation11 Furthermore, the final cell size in the mature leaves is typically 2.2-fold greater in KRP2 o/e, and varies between 1.4 and 1.8 higher in other mutants, including fas1, an3, and fugu5, compared with wild type.Citation11,Citation16 Based on these results, KRP2 o/e undergo size inflation compared with other mutants. However, this may not be the case if we consider the original size of the cells in leaf primordia when cells are actively dividing. Based on the findings of Kawade et al.,Citation9 the induction of KRP2 overexpression by heat shock during the proliferative stage of leaf development (4 DAS) is required to induce CCE in leaves. In contrast, delayed induction at 7 or 10 DAS produced leaves with significantly smaller cells than in the KRP2 o/e (i.e., 35S::KRP2 lines) or equal in size to wild-type cells, respectively.Citation9 This suggests that KRP2 has no direct function in enhancing cell expansion in post-mitotic cells.Citation9 In other words, if we assume that increased V-ATPase activity in KRP2 o/e mediates CCE,Citation12 this increase must occur during the mitotic stage of leaf development. Thus, 1) the large cells in the KRP2 o/e represents the outcome of increased V-ATPase activity during the proliferative stage, 2) the final cell size in the KRP2 o/e is a consequence of 1), 3) the increased cell size in the KRP2 o/e is not triggered by a decrease in cell number because cell enlargement had already occurred and was sustained during the proliferative stage in these lines, and 4) endoreduplication does not contribute to the cell size increase.Citation11 Overall, these features of KRP2 o/e differ from those of other compensation exhibiting mutants such as an3, fas1, and fugu5.Citation11,Citation17 Since the cellular phenotypes of KRP2 o/e an3 double mutants are additive,Citation9 and decreased V-ATPase activity does not suppress CCE in an3; fas1 and fugu5,Citation12 CCE in KRP2 o/e and other mutant lines differs significantly. Therefore, we propose that the class III compensation observed in KRP2 o/e should be assigned to a sub-category distinct from typical compensation.

Plants are sessile, yet they must cope with continuously fluctuating environments; thus, they show flexible morphogenetic control. Organogenesis can occur independently (to some extent) from cell division, provided that KRP2 o/e can develop organs (although they are abnormal in size and shape and have 90% fewer cells than wild type).Citation11,Citation12,Citation13,Citation18 In addition, in KRP2 o/e, the cell size remained constant and the cells maintained their ability to divide, indicating that the increased size of the KRP2 o/e was not due to uncoupling between cell cycling and cell growth.Citation7,Citation11

During normal leaf development, 2 qualitatively different modes (non-cell-autonomous and cell-autonomous modes in an3 and KRP2 o/e, respectively) are involved in the coordination of cell proliferation and post-mitotic cell expansion in leaves.7,Citation9,Citation19 The fact that decreased V-ATPase activity in det3–1 KRP2 o/e suppressed class III CCE in KRP2 o/e, but not an3, supports the cell-autonomous nature of CCE and the immobile nature of the V-ATPase complex.Citation9,Citation12,Citation19

A study by Jun et al. indicated that KRP3 overexpression significantly reduced the number of cells in leaves, but that their increased size (~2.2-fold) involved an increase in ploidy, which is different from KRP2 o/e.Citation14 Although KRPs overproduction results in morphological similarities, their functions are only partially overlapping. Excluding KRP4, for which overexpressing transgenic lines have not been reported, the overproduction of most other KRP genes increases the cell size in tissues with meristematic features, including the shoot apical meristem and dividing cells in young leaf primordia.Citation11,Citation13,Citation14 This increase can be achieved either by increased endocycling and/or V-ATPase activity (probably through enhanced cell wall synthesis).Citation12,Citation14 To understand the contribution of these KRPs to cell size regulation, a detailed analysis considering the above processes should be performed.

In tobacco, overproduction of a dominant-negative (DN) form of Arabidopsis cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKA;1) has similar phenotypic effects on leaf development to that of KRP2 o/e.Citation11,Citation12,Citation13,Citation18 Importantly, the nuclear DNA content in DN tobacco lines was similar to that in control plants.Citation18 Compensation has been reported in transgenic rice plants overexpressing OsKRP1.Citation20 These observations suggest that class III compensation is a universal phenomenon in monocots and eudicots, and that V-ATPase plays a role in the increased cell size in plant species other than Arabidopsis. Overall, our results may be applicable to the entire plant kingdom.

Abbreviations:
CCE=

compensated cell expansion

DAS=

days after sowing

KRP2 o/e=

KIP-RELATED PROTEIN 2 overexpressors

V-ATPase=

vacuolar type H+-ATPase

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (to Ferjani A); Scientific Research on Priority Areas (to Tsukaya H); Scientific Research [23248017 and 24114706, to Maeshima M]; the Steel Foundation for Environmental Protection Technology (to Maeshima M); Creative Scientific Research (to Tsukaya H); the Toray Science Foundation (grants to Tsukaya H); Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (to Ferjani A, Horiguchi G, and Tsukaya H).

References

  • Tsukaya H. Mechanism of leaf-shape determination. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006; 57:477 - 96; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105320; PMID: 16669771
  • Tsukaya H. Controlling size in multicellular organs: focus on the leaf. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:e174; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060174; PMID: 18630989
  • Powell AE, Lenhard M. Control of organ size in plants. Curr Biol 2012; 22:R360 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.010; PMID: 22575478
  • Micol JL. Leaf development: time to turn over a new leaf?. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009; 12:9 - 16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2008.11.001; PMID: 19109050
  • Tsukaya H. Interpretation of mutants in leaf morphology: genetic evidence for a compensatory system in leaf morphogenesis that provides a new link between cell and organismal theories. Int Rev Cytol 2002; 217:1 - 39; PMID: 12019561
  • Horiguchi G, Ferjani A, Fujikura U, Tsukaya H. Coordination of cell proliferation and cell expansion in the control of leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana.. J Plant Res 2006; 119:37 - 42; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10265-005-0232-4; PMID: 16284709
  • Ferjani A, Yano S, Horiguchi G, Tsukaya H. Control of leaf morphogenesis by long- and short-distance signaling: differentiation of leaves into sun or shade types and compensated cell enlargement. In: Bögre L, Beemster GTS, eds. Plant Growth Signaling (Plant Cell Monograph series, #10). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 47-62
  • Ferjani A, Horiguchi G, Tsukaya H. Organ size control in Arabidopsis: Insights from compensation studies. Plant Morphology 2010; 22:65 - 71; http://dx.doi.org/10.5685/plmorphol.22.65
  • Kawade K, Horiguchi G, Tsukaya H. Non-cell-autonomously coordinated organ size regulation in leaf development. Development 2010; 137:4221 - 7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.057117; PMID: 21068059
  • Horiguchi G, Tsukaya H. Organ size regulation in plants: insights from compensation. Front Plant Sci 2011; 2:24; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00024; PMID: 22639585
  • Ferjani A, Horiguchi G, Yano S, Tsukaya H. Analysis of leaf development in fugu mutants of Arabidopsis reveals three compensation modes that modulate cell expansion in determinate organs. Plant Physiol 2007; 144:988 - 99; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.099325; PMID: 17468216
  • Ferjani A, Ishikawa K, Asaoka M, Ishida M, Horiguchi G, Maeshima M, Tsukaya H. Enhanced cell expansion in a KRP2 overexpressor is mediated by increased V-ATPase activity. Plant Cell Physiol 2013; 54:1989-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pct138; PMID: 24068796
  • De Veylder L, Beeckman T, Beemster GT, Krols L, Terras F, Landrieu I, van der Schueren E, Maes S, Naudts M, Inzé D. Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of Arabidopsis.. Plant Cell 2001; 13:1653 - 68; PMID: 11449057
  • Jun SE, Okushima Y, Nam J, Umeda M, Kim GT. Kip-related protein 3 is required for control of endoreduplication in the shoot apical meristem and leaves of Arabidopsis.. Mol Cells 2013; 35:47 - 53; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10059-013-2270-4; PMID: 23314608
  • Wang H, Zhou Y, Gilmer S, Whitwill S, Fowke LC. Expression of the plant cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor ICK1 affects cell division, plant growth and morphology. Plant J 2000; 24:613 - 23; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00899.x; PMID: 11123800
  • Ferjani A, Segami S, Horiguchi G, Muto Y, Maeshima M, Tsukaya H. Keep an eye on PPi: the vacuolar-type H+-pyrophosphatase regulates postgerminative development in Arabidopsis.. Plant Cell 2011; 23:2895 - 908; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.085415; PMID: 21862707
  • Hisanaga T, Ferjani A, Horiguchi G, Ishikawa N, Fujikura U, Kubo M, Demura T, Fukuda H, Ishida T, Sugimoto K, et al. The ATM-dependent DNA damage response acts as an upstream trigger for compensation in the fas1 mutation during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Physiol 2013; 162:831 - 41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.216796; PMID: 23616603
  • Hemerly A, Engler JdeA, Bergounioux C, Van Montagu M, Engler G, Inzé D, Ferreira P. Dominant negative mutants of the Cdc2 kinase uncouple cell division from iterative plant development. EMBO J 1995; 14:3925 - 36; PMID: 7664733
  • Kawade K, Horiguchi G, Usami T, Hirai MY, Tsukaya H. ANGUSTIFOLIA3 signaling coordinates proliferation between clonally distinct cells in leaves. Curr Biol 2013; 23:788 - 92; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.044; PMID: 23602479
  • Barrôco RM, Peres A, Droual AM, De Veylder L, Nguyen SL, De Wolf J, Mironov V, Peerbolte R, Beemster GT, Inzé D, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Orysa;KRP1 plays an important role in seed development of rice. Plant Physiol 2006; 142:1053 - 64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.087056; PMID: 17012406

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.