1,702
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Learning and teaching style assessment for improving project-based learning of engineering students: A case of United Arab Emirates University

Pages 81-94 | Received 13 Nov 2013, Accepted 02 Mar 2015, Published online: 04 Jan 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Learning styles of most engineering students and teaching styles of most engineering academic staff are incompatible in several dimensions. Many or most engineering students are visual, sensing, inductive and active, whereas engineering education is mostly verbal (auditory), abstract (intuitive), deductive, passive and sequential. These mismatches lead to poor student performance, professorial frustration and a barrier to produce many potentially excellent engineers. The modern method of engineering education involves contemporary teaching and learning practices using project and program based learning, work integrated learning and integrative learning approaches. Project-based learning (PBL) is acknowledged as a collaborative, progressive, student-centred, interactive, active and deep learning approach. The paper investigates the learning styles of engineering students, teaching approaches of engineering academic staff, the role of smart technologies and their applications for the implementation of PBL in engineering education at the United Arab Emirates University. Students and academic staff were surveyed to understand their learning and teaching styles respectively. Most engineering students are observed active (57%), sensory (71%), visual (83%) and sequential (68%). Surveyed engineering academic staff exhibited their strong preference to expert, delegator and facilitator style of teaching. Students were observed to use different educational technologies frequently and approximately 52% students were identified using electronic media and technology as their learning resources. Only 22% of students indicated small group work as their learning resources, which indicates lack of collaborative learning of students. Previous studies discovered that PBL approach prefers facilitator style of teaching rather than expert or delegator styles. The paper discusses the improvement of PBL in engineering education through understanding of learning and teaching styles.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

RK Chowdhury

Dr Rezaul K. Chowdhury has several years of university teaching and research experience. Currently he is an Assistant Professor of Water Resources at the United Arab Emirates University, and an Adjunct Research Fellow at the University of South Australia. Previously Rezaul was a Research Fellow of Water Engineering at the University of South Australia, and a scientist with Integrated Water Systems Planning and Management at the CSIRO in Australia. Rezaul started his career as a Lecturer of Civil and Environmental at the ShahJalal University of Science and Technology in Bangladesh. He has participated in several advanced trainings and workshops on university teaching and curriculum development. He has published more than 45 research articles in leading international journals and conferences. He is an active reviewer of several high impact factor journals. Rezaul is involved in supervising postgraduate research students.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.