94
Views
83
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Marcellus Shale Gas Development and New Boomtown Research: Views of New York and Pennsylvania Residents

, , , , &
Pages 382-393 | Received 04 Jun 2012, Accepted 24 Sep 2012, Published online: 03 Jan 2017

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (10)

Yu Zhang, Ashley Clark, John A. Rupp & John D. Graham. (2022) A comparative study of Chinese and American public perceptions of shale gas development. Journal of Risk Research 25:6, pages 715-737.
Read now
Chin-Hsien Yu, Huimin Tan, Ping Qin & Xiaolan Chen. (2020) Local Residents’ Attitudes toward Shale Gas Exploitation: A Case Study in Sichuan, China. Society & Natural Resources 33:9, pages 1092-1110.
Read now
Anne N. Junod, Jeffrey B. Jacquet, Felix Fernando & Lynette Flage. (2018) Life in the Goldilocks Zone: Perceptions of Place Disruption on the Periphery of the Bakken Shale. Society & Natural Resources 31:2, pages 200-217.
Read now
Junesoo Lee & Jeongyoon Lee. (2018) Seeds of distrust: conflicts over sustainable development in a local fracking policy network in New York State. Public Management Review 20:1, pages 108-135.
Read now
Darrick Evensen. (2017) ‘If they only knew what I know’: Attitude change from education about ‘fracking’. Environmental Practice 19:2, pages 68-79.
Read now
Hilary Boudet, Dylan Bugden, Chad Zanocco & Edward Maibach. (2016) The effect of industry activities on public support for ‘fracking’. Environmental Politics 25:4, pages 593-612.
Read now
Sabrina Habib & Melanie Sberna Hinojosa. (2016) Research Article: Representation of Fracking in Mainstream American Newspapers. Environmental Practice 18:2, pages 83-93.
Read now
Jeffrey B. Jacquet & Richard C. Stedman. (2014) The risk of social-psychological disruption as an impact of energy development and environmental change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57:9, pages 1285-1304.
Read now
Kathryn J. Brasier, Diane K. McLaughlin, Danielle Rhubart, Richard C. Stedman, Matthew R. Filteau & Jeffrey Jacquet. (2013) Research Articles: Risk Perceptions of Natural Gas Development in the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Practice 15:2, pages 108-122.
Read now
Tamara Gagnolet & Scott Bearer. (2012) Letter from the Guest Editors: Hydrofracturing Special Issue of Environmental Practice. Environmental Practice 14:4, pages 246-247.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (73)

Emily Grubert. (2022) Yellow, red, and brown energy: leveraging water footprinting concepts for decarbonizing energy systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability 25:7, pages 7239-7260.
Crossref
Christopher E. Clarke & Darrick T.N. Evensen. (2023) Attention to news media coverage of unconventional oil/gas development impacts: Exploring psychological antecedents and effects on issue support. Energy Policy 173, pages 113355.
Crossref
Feizel Ayitey Aryee. (2022) Topic: Perception of Recreancy as a Predictor of Stress Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing — the Case of England. Trends in Psychology.
Crossref
Catherine E. Lambert. (2022) Beneath your feet and in your place: Multi-scalar imaginaries of energy, place, and local geothermal development. Energy Research & Social Science 94, pages 102856.
Crossref
Andrew Tracy, Amy Javernick-Will & Abbie Liel. (2022) Factors influencing public beliefs regarding the cause of induced earthquakes. Natural Hazards 114:1, pages 183-204.
Crossref
Huimin Tan, Gabrielle Wong-Parodi, Shumin Zhang & Jianhua Xu. (2022) Public risk perceptions of shale gas development: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science 89, pages 102548.
Crossref
Dilge Güldehen Kânoğlu-Özkan & Uğur Soytaş. (2022) The social acceptance of shale gas development: Evidence from Turkey. Energy 239, pages 122150.
Crossref
Isaac Lyatuu, Mirko S. Winkler, Georg Loss, Andrea Farnham, Dominik Dietler & Günther Fink. (2021) Estimating the mortality burden of large scale mining projects—Evidence from a prospective mortality surveillance study in Tanzania. PLOS Global Public Health 1:10, pages e0000008.
Crossref
Yu Zhang, John A. Rupp & John D. Graham. (2021) Contrasting Public and Scientific Assessments of Fracking. Sustainability 13:12, pages 6650.
Crossref
Isaac Lyatuu, Georg Loss, Andrea Farnham, Goodluck W. Lyatuu, Günther Fink & Mirko S. Winkler. (2021) Associations between Natural Resource Extraction and Incidence of Acute and Chronic Health Conditions: Evidence from Tanzania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18:11, pages 6052.
Crossref
Jessica Lehman & Abby Kinchy. (2021) Bringing climate politics home: Lived experiences of flooding and housing insecurity in a natural gas boomtown. Geoforum 121, pages 152-161.
Crossref
Benjamin K. Sovacool, Jinsoo Kim & Minyoung Yang. (2021) The hidden costs of energy and mobility: A global meta-analysis and research synthesis of electricity and transport externalities. Energy Research & Social Science 72, pages 101885.
Crossref
Stephanie A. Malin, Adam Mayer & Jill Lindsey Harrison. 2021. Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Handbook of Environmental Sociology 141 165 .
Ramiro Berardo, Federico Holm, Tanya Heikkila, Christopher M. Weible, Hongtao Yi, Jennifer Kagan, Catherine Chen & Jill Yordy. (2020) Hydraulic fracturing and political conflict: News media coverage of topics and themes across nine states. Energy Research & Social Science 70, pages 101660.
Crossref
Mark Suchyta. (2020) Sense of place as a predictor of beliefs about energy development: A study in Pennsylvania’s Marcellus Shale. Energy Research & Social Science 70, pages 101635.
Crossref
Andrew Tracy & Amy Javernick-Will. (2020) How Induced Seismicity Impacts Community Perceptions of Oil and Gas Development. How Induced Seismicity Impacts Community Perceptions of Oil and Gas Development.
Chad Zanocco, Hilary Boudet, Christopher E Clarke, Richard Stedman & Darrick Evensen. (2020) NIMBY, YIMBY, or something else? Geographies of public perceptions of shale gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Environmental Research Letters 15:7, pages 074039.
Crossref
Paul Stretesky & Philipp Grimmer. (2020) Shale gas development and crime: A review of the literature. The Extractive Industries and Society 7:3, pages 1147-1157.
Crossref
Andrew Tracy & Amy Javernick-Will. (2020) Credible Sources of Information Regarding Induced Seismicity. Sustainability 12:6, pages 2308.
Crossref
Tristan Partridge, Merryn Thomas, Nick Pidgeon & Barbara Herr Harthorn. (2019) Disturbed Earth: Conceptions of the Deep Underground in Shale Extraction Deliberations in the US and UK. Environmental Values 28:6, pages 641-663.
Crossref
Matthew Cotton, Ralf Barkemeyer, Barbara Gabriella Renzi & Giulio Napolitano. (2019) Fracking and metaphor: Analysing newspaper discourse in the USA, Australia and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 166, pages 106426.
Crossref
David J. Turton. (2019) Fracturing planners: A study of their contribution to Australia’s coal seam gas debate. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:4, pages 1314-1324.
Crossref
Hanabeth Luke & Nia Emmanouil. (2019) ‘All dressed up with nowhere to go’: Navigating the coal seam gas boom in the Western Downs region of Queensland. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:4, pages 1350-1361.
Crossref
Thomas G. Measham, Andrea Walton, Paul Graham & David A. Fleming-Muñoz. (2019) Living with resource booms and busts: Employment scenarios and resilience to unconventional gas cyclical effects in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science 56, pages 101221.
Crossref
Paul Fawcett, Michael J. Jensen, Hedda Ransan-Cooper & Sonya Duus. (2018) Explaining the “ebb and flow” of the problem stream: frame conflicts over the future of coal seam gas (“fracking”) in Australia. Journal of Public Policy 39:3, pages 521-541.
Crossref
Michael D. Ferguson, Myles L. Lynch, Samantha L. Powers, Austin G. Barrett, Darrick Evensen, Alan R. Graefe & Andrew J. Mowen. (2019) The impacts of shale natural gas energy development on outdoor recreation: A statewide assessment of pennsylvanians. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 27, pages 100230.
Crossref
Max D. Woodworth. (2018) Finding a place for boomtowns in energy geographies. Area 51:2, pages 307-314.
Crossref
Christopher E. Clarke & Darrick T.N. Evensen. (2019) The politics of scientific consensus? Political divergence and partisanship in unconventional energy development in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 51, pages 156-167.
Crossref
Thurka Sangaramoorthy. (2019) Maryland is not for Shale: Scientific and public anxieties of predicting health impacts of fracking. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:2, pages 463-470.
Crossref
Raymundo Marcos-Martinez, Thomas G. Measham & David A. Fleming-Muñoz. (2019) Economic impacts of early unconventional gas mining: Lessons from the coal seam gas industry in New South Wales, Australia. Energy Policy 125, pages 338-346.
Crossref
Shawn K. Olson-Hazboun, Peter D. Howe & Anthony Leiserowitz. (2018) The influence of extractive activities on public support for renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 123, pages 117-126.
Crossref
Emily Grubert. (2018) The Eagle Ford and Bakken shale regions of the United States: A comparative case study. The Extractive Industries and Society 5:4, pages 570-580.
Crossref
Austin Zwick. (2018) Comparison of the Coal and Fracking Industries in Northern Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies 24:2, pages 168-184.
Crossref
Hilary S. Boudet, Chad M. Zanocco, Peter D. Howe & Christopher E. Clarke. (2018) The Effect of Geographic Proximity to Unconventional Oil and Gas Development on Public Support for Hydraulic Fracturing. Risk Analysis 38:9, pages 1871-1890.
Crossref
Colin Jerolmack & Edward T. Walker. (2018) Please in My Backyard: Quiet Mobilization in Support of Fracking in an Appalachian Community. American Journal of Sociology 124:2, pages 479-516.
Crossref
Jonathan J. Pierce, Hilary Boudet, Chad Zanocco & Megan Hillyard. (2018) Analyzing the factors that influence U.S. public support for exporting natural gas. Energy Policy 120, pages 666-674.
Crossref
Celia Lewis, Lydia H. Greiner & David R. Brown. (2018) Setback distances for unconventional oil and gas development: Delphi study results. PLOS ONE 13:8, pages e0202462.
Crossref
Christopher D. O’Connor & Kaitlin Fredericks. (2018) Citizen perceptions of fracking: The risks and opportunities of natural gas development in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science 42, pages 61-69.
Crossref
Danielle M. McLaughlin & Bethany B. Cutts. (2018) Neither Knowledge Deficit nor NIMBY: Understanding Opposition to Hydraulic Fracturing as a Nuanced Coalition in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (USA). Environmental Management 62:2, pages 305-322.
Crossref
Shawn K. Olson-Hazboun. (2018) “Why are we being punished and they are being rewarded?” views on renewable energy in fossil fuels-based communities of the U.S. west. The Extractive Industries and Society 5:3, pages 366-374.
Crossref
Matthew Cotton & Ioan Charnley-Parry. (2018) Beyond opposition and acceptance: Examining public perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 3, pages 8-13.
Crossref
Kent E. Portney, Bryce Hannibal, Carol Goldsmith, Peyton McGee, Xinsheng Liu & Arnold Vedlitz. (2017) Awareness of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus and Public Policy Support in the United States: Public Attitudes Among the American People. Environment and Behavior 50:4, pages 375-400.
Crossref
Jennifer Baka, Kate J. Neville, Erika Weinthal & Karen Bakker. (2018) Agenda‐Setting at the Energy‐Water Nexus: Constructing and Maintaining a Policy Monopoly in U.S. Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation. Review of Policy Research 35:3, pages 439-465.
Crossref
Darrick Evensen & Rich Stedman. (2018) ‘Fracking’: Promoter and destroyer of ‘the good life’. Journal of Rural Studies 59, pages 142-152.
Crossref
Gwen Arnold, Benjamin Farrer & Robert Holahan. (2017) Measuring Environmental and Economic Opinions about Hydraulic Fracturing: A Survey of Landowners in Active or Planned Drilling Units. Review of Policy Research 35:2, pages 258-279.
Crossref
Darrick Evensen, Richard Stedman, Sarah O’Hara, Mathew Humphrey & Jessica Andersson-Hudson. (2017) Variation in beliefs about ‘fracking’ between the UK and US. Environmental Research Letters 12:12, pages 124004.
Crossref
Kate J. NevilleJennifer Baka, Shanti Gamper-Rabindran, Karen Bakker, Stefan Andreasson, Avner Vengosh, Alvin Lin, Jewellord Nem Singh & Erika Weinthal. (2017) Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42:1, pages 241-266.
Crossref
Kristen Abatsis McHenry. (2017) Fracking Women: A Feminist Critical Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing in Pennsylvania. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10:2, pages 79-104.
Crossref
Jessica Alcorn, John Rupp & John D. Graham. (2017) Attitudes Toward “Fracking”: Perceived and Actual Geographic Proximity. Review of Policy Research 34:4, pages 504-536.
Crossref
Dylan Bugden, Darrick Evensen & Richard Stedman. (2017) A drill by any other name: Social representations, framing, and legacies of natural resource extraction in the fracking industry. Energy Research & Social Science 29, pages 62-71.
Crossref
Merryn Thomas, Nick Pidgeon, Darrick Evensen, Tristan Partridge, Ariel Hasell, Catherine Enders, Barbara Herr Harthorn & Michael Bradshaw. (2017) Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada. WIREs Climate Change 8:3.
Crossref
Rick RuddellRick Ruddell. 2017. Oil, Gas, and Crime. Oil, Gas, and Crime 209 231 .
Gene L. Theodori & Colter Ellis. (2017) Hydraulic fracturing: Assessing self-reported familiarity and the contributions of selected sources to self-reported knowledge. The Extractive Industries and Society 4:1, pages 95-101.
Crossref
Matthew R. Filteau. (2016) “If You Talk Badly about Drilling, You're a Pariah”: Challenging a Capitalist Patriarchy in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale Region. Rural Sociology 81:4, pages 519-544.
Crossref
Richard C. Stedman, Darrick Evensen, Sarah O’Hara & Mathew Humphrey. (2016) Comparing the relationship between knowledge and support for hydraulic fracturing between residents of the United States and the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 20, pages 142-148.
Crossref
Colter Ellis, Gene L. Theodori, Peggy Petrzelka, Douglas Jackson-Smith & A.E. Luloff. (2016) Unconventional risks: The experience of acute energy development in the Eagle Ford Shale. Energy Research & Social Science 20, pages 91-98.
Crossref
Christopher E. Clarke, Dylan Bugden, P. Sol Hart, Richard C. Stedman, Jeffrey B. Jacquet, Darrick T.N. Evensen & Hilary S. Boudet. (2016) How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy 97, pages 301-309.
Crossref
Felix N. Fernando & Dennis R. Cooley. (2016) Attitudes toward shale oil development in western North Dakota: The role of place based community values in attitude formation. Journal of Rural Studies 46, pages 132-146.
Crossref
Claudia Benham. (2016) Change, opportunity and grief: Understanding the complex social-ecological impacts of Liquefied Natural Gas development in the Australian coastal zone. Energy Research & Social Science 14, pages 61-70.
Crossref
Thomas G. Measham, David A. Fleming & Heinz Schandl. (2016) A conceptual model of the socioeconomic impacts of unconventional fossil fuel extraction. Global Environmental Change 36, pages 101-110.
Crossref
Nikolaos Zirogiannis, Jessica Alcorn, John Rupp, Sanya Carley & John D. Graham. (2016) State regulation of unconventional gas development in the U.S.: An empirical evaluation. Energy Research & Social Science 11, pages 142-154.
Crossref
Olivia Ashmoore, Darrick Evensen, Chris Clarke, Jennifer Krakower & Jeremy Simon. (2016) Regional newspaper coverage of shale gas development across Ohio, New York, and Pennsylvania: Similarities, differences, and lessons. Energy Research & Social Science 11, pages 119-132.
Crossref
Michele Morrone, Amy E. Chadwick & Natalie Kruse. (2015) A Community Divided: Hydraulic Fracturing in Rural Appalachia. Journal of Appalachian Studies 21:2, pages 207-228.
Crossref
John D. Graham, John A. Rupp & Olga Schenk. (2015) Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues. Risk Analysis 35:10, pages 1770-1788.
Crossref
Henda Jabberi ben Jaballah & Faouzi ben Ammar. (2015) Life cycle assessment impact of fraking shale gas in Tunisia. Life cycle assessment impact of fraking shale gas in Tunisia.
Martin Perry & James E Rowe. (2014) Fly-in, fly-out, drive-in, drive-out: The Australian mining boom and its impacts on the local economy. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit 30:1, pages 139-148.
Crossref
DAVID J. TURTON. (2015) Unconventional Gas in A ustralia: Towards a Legal Geography . Geographical Research 53:1, pages 53-67.
Crossref
Thomas G. Measham & David A. Fleming. (2014) Impacts of unconventional gas development on rural community decline. Journal of Rural Studies 36, pages 376-385.
Crossref
Jeffrey B. Jacquet. (2014) Review of Risks to Communities from Shale Energy Development. Environmental Science & Technology 48:15, pages 8321-8333.
Crossref
Susan Reider & Robert Wasserstrom. (2014) Addressing the Social and Community Impacts of Shale Gas Development. Addressing the Social and Community Impacts of Shale Gas Development.
Darrick T. Evensen, Christopher E. Clarke & Richard C. Stedman. (2013) A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations in newspaper coverage of gas development in the Marcellus Shale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4:1, pages 65-77.
Crossref
Hilary Boudet, Christopher Clarke, Dylan Bugden, Edward Maibach, Connie Roser-Renouf & Anthony Leiserowitz. (2014) “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy 65, pages 57-67.
Crossref
Jeffrey B. Jacquet & Richard C. Stedman. (2013) Perceived Impacts from Wind Farm and Natural Gas Development in Northern Pennsylvania. Rural Sociology 78:4, pages 450-472.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.