590
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Practical 3D EM inversion – the P223F software suite

, &
Pages 1-5 | Published online: 09 Dec 2019

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Marc A. Vallée & Mouhamed Moussaoui. (2023) Modelling the electromagnetic response of a sphere located in a layered earth. Exploration Geophysics 54:4, pages 362-375.
Read now
David Annetts & Juerg Hauser. (2019) Target detectability in regional-scale AEM surveys. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2019:1, pages 1-6.
Read now
Greg Walker, Rod Paterson, Jovan Silic & Des FitzGerald. (2019) 2.5D inversion of airborne EM data – a case study from new regional AEM data from the Mammoth Mines region, Queensland.. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2019:1, pages 1-5.
Read now
Leif H. Cox, Glenn A. Wilson & Michael S. Zhdanov. (2010) 3D inversion of entire airborne electromagnetic surveys using a moving footprint. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2010:1, pages 1-4.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (32)

In Seok Joung, Sung Oh Cho, Bitnarae Kim, Juyeon Jeong, Soocheol Jeong, Hangilro Jang, Pierre-Alexandre Reninger & Myung Jin Nam. (2022) A Review of the Time-domain Electromagnetic Method: Research Trends and Applications. Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers 59:4, pages 364-378.
Crossref
João Carvalho, Pedro Dias, Charles Revaux, João Xavier Matos, Vítor Araújo, Carlos Inverno, Fábio Marques, George A. Donoso, Nelson Pacheco, Igor Morais, Luís Albardeiro, Maria João Batista, Alireza Malehmir, Bill Spicer & Daniel de Oliveira. (2021) A drill-hole, geological and geophysical data-based 3D model for target generation in Neves-Corvo mine region, Portugal. International Journal of Earth Sciences 111:2, pages 403-424.
Crossref
Rong Liu, DeShan Feng & RongWen Guo. (2022) 3-D Inversion of Airborne Electromagnetic Method Based on Footprint-Guided CFEM Modeling. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 19, pages 1-5.
Crossref
Hai Li, Guoqiang Xue & Linbo Zhang. (2021) Accelerated Bayesian Inversion of Transient Electromagnetic Data Using MCMC Subposteriors. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59:12, pages 10000-10010.
Crossref
Raphael Rochlitz, Marc Seidel & Ralph-Uwe Börner. (2021) Evaluation of three approaches for simulating 3-D time-domain electromagnetic data. Geophysical Journal International 227:3, pages 1980-1995.
Crossref
Ronghua Peng, Bo Han, Yajun Liu & Xiangyun Hu. (2021) EM3DANI: A Julia package for fully anisotropic 3D forward modeling of electromagnetic data. GEOPHYSICS 86:5, pages F49-F60.
Crossref
Greg Walker, Desmond FitzGerald*, Rod Paterson & Jovan Silic. (2021) 2.5D inversion of airborne EM data — A case study from new regional AEM data from Mammoth Mines region, Queensland. 2.5D inversion of airborne EM data — A case study from new regional AEM data from Mammoth Mines region, Queensland.
Pedro Dias, Hans Thunehed, Patrícia Represas, João Carvalho, Carlos Inverno, Bill Spicer, Elsa Ramalho, George A. Donoso, Vitor Araújo, Fábio Marques, Igor Morais, Alireza Malehmir & Nelson Pacheco. (2021) Geophysical investigation of the down-dip extension of the Lombador massive sulphide deposit, Neves-Corvo, Portugal. International Journal of Earth Sciences 110:3, pages 911-922.
Crossref
Shengjun Liang, Siyuan Sun & Hongfei Lu. (2021) Application of Airborne Electromagnetics and Magnetics for Mineral Exploration in the Baishiquan–Hongliujing Area, Northwest China. Remote Sensing 13:5, pages 903.
Crossref
Peng Wang, Weihua Yao, Jianlei Guo, Chao Su, Qing Wang, Yi Wang, Buwen Zhang & Cheng Wang. (2021) Detection of Shallow Buried Water-Filled Goafs Using the Fixed-Loop Transient Electromagnetic Method: A Case Study in Shaanxi, China. Pure and Applied Geophysics 178:2, pages 529-544.
Crossref
Peter K. FullagarRalf Schaa. (2021) Analytic formulas for complete and incomplete first-order TEM moments below ground in a conductive half-space. GEOPHYSICS 86:1, pages E1-E11.
Crossref
Hosseinali Ghari, Behrooz Oskooi & Mehrdad Bastani. (2020) Multi-Line 1D Inversion of Frequency-Domain Helicopter-Borne Electromagnetic Data with Weighted 3D Smoothness Regularization: A Case Study from Northern Iran. Pure and Applied Geophysics 177:11, pages 5299-5323.
Crossref
Chong Liu, LiZhen Cheng, Xueping Dai & Mamadou Cherif Diallo. (2020) Improvement of the Efficiency of Time-Domain Electromagnetic Measurement. Pure and Applied Geophysics 177:7, pages 3383-3394.
Crossref
Aaron Davis & Juerg Hauser. (2020) Blocking borehole conductivity logs at the resolution of above-ground electromagnetic systems. GEOPHYSICS 85:2, pages E67-E77.
Crossref
Changkai Qiu*, Changchun Yin, Yunhe Liu, Bo Zhang, Xiuyan Ren, Cong Wang & Jing Cai. (2019) Rational Krylov method for 3D time-domain airborne EM modeling. Rational Krylov method for 3D time-domain airborne EM modeling.
Xueping Dai, Li Zhen Cheng, Jean-Claude Mareschal, Daniel Lemire & Chong Liu. (2019) New method for denoising borehole transient electromagnetic data with discrete wavelet transform. Journal of Applied Geophysics 168, pages 41-48.
Crossref
A. C. Davis, N. Skibbe & M. Müller‐Petke. (2019) First Measurements of Surface Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Signals in a Grounded Bipole. Geophysical Research Letters 46:16, pages 9620-9627.
Crossref
J. N. Ogunbo. (2019) Mono‐Model Parameter Joint Inversion by Gramian Constraints: EM Methods Examples. Earth and Space Science 6:5, pages 741-751.
Crossref
Nasreddine Bournas, Alexander Prikhodko, Karl Kwan, Jean Legault, Vitallii Polianichko & Sergei Treshchev. (2018) A new approach for kimberlite exploration using helicopter-borne TDEM data. A new approach for kimberlite exploration using helicopter-borne TDEM data.
Jide Nosakare Ogunbo, Guy MarquisJie Zhang & Weizhong Wang. (2018) Joint inversion of seismic traveltime and frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic data for hydrocarbon exploration. GEOPHYSICS 83:2, pages U9-U22.
Crossref
Wei Huang, Fang Ben, Chang-Chun Yin, Qing-Min Meng, Wen-Jie Li, Gui-Xiang Liao, Shan Wu & Yong-Zai Xi. (2017) Three-dimensional arbitrarily anisotropic modeling for time-domain airborne electromagnetic surveys. Applied Geophysics 14:3, pages 431-440.
Crossref
Andrew King & Ignacio Gonzalez-Alvarez. (2017) Exploiting landscape evolution understanding for electromagnetic inversion of regolith. Exploiting landscape evolution understanding for electromagnetic inversion of regolith.
Juerg HauserJames GunningDavid Annetts. (2016) Probabilistic inversion of airborne electromagnetic data for basement conductors. GEOPHYSICS 81:5, pages E389-E400.
Crossref
Yin Chang-ChunRen Xiu-YanLiu Yun-HeQi Yan-FuQiu Chang-KaiCai Jing. (2015) Review on airborne electromagnetic inverse theory and applications. GEOPHYSICS 80:4, pages W17-W31.
Crossref
Juerg HauserJames GunningDavid Annetts. (2015) Probabilistic inversion of airborne electromagnetic data under spatial constraints. GEOPHYSICS 80:2, pages E135-E146.
Crossref
Leif H. Cox & Michael S. Zhdanov. (2014) 3D airborne electromagnetic inversion using a hybrid edge-based FE-IE method with moving sensitivity domain. 3D airborne electromagnetic inversion using a hybrid edge-based FE-IE method with moving sensitivity domain.
Leif H. CoxGlenn A. WilsonMichael S. Zhdanov. (2012) 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data. GEOPHYSICS 77:4, pages WB59-WB69.
Crossref
Glenn A. Wilson, Leif H. Cox, Martin Čuma & Michael S. Zhdanov. (2012) Inverting airborne geophysical data for mega-cell and giga-cell 3D Earth models. The Leading Edge 31:3, pages 316-321.
Crossref
Ralf SchaaPeter K. Fullagar. (2012) Vertical and horizontal resistive limit formulas for a rectangular-loop source on a conductive half-space. GEOPHYSICS 77:1, pages E91-E99.
Crossref
Michael S. Zhdanov. (2010) Electromagnetic geophysics: Notes from the past and the road ahead. GEOPHYSICS 75:5, pages 75A49-75A66.
Crossref
Michael S. Zhdanov & Steven Constable. 2010. Geophysics Today. Geophysics Today 53 87 .
Leif H. Cox, Glenn A. Wilson & Michael S. Zhdanov. (2010) 3D inversion of frequency‐domain AEM surveys with a moving footprint. 3D inversion of frequency‐domain AEM surveys with a moving footprint.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.