3
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Critical Perspectives on Perelman's Philosophy of Legal Argument

Pages 88-95 | Published online: 23 Jan 2018

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Paul Stob. (2006) Chisholm V. Georgia and the Question of the Judiciary in the Early Republic. Argumentation and Advocacy 42:3, pages 127-142.
Read now
Marouf Hasian$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2003) In Search of “Ivan the Terrible”: John Demjanjuk and the Judicial Use of Ironic Argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy 39:4, pages 231-253.
Read now
Marouf Hasian$suffix/text()$suffix/text() & Earl Croasmun. (1992) The Legitimizing Function of Judicial Rhetoric in the Eugenics Controversy. Argumentation and Advocacy 28:3, pages 123-134.
Read now

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.