Citations (8)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (2)
AlainF. Corcos & FloydV. Monaghan. (1990) Mendel's work and its rediscovery: A new perspective. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 9:3, pages 197-212.
Read now
Read now
OnnoG. Meijer. (1985) Hugo de vries no mendelian?. Annals of Science 42:3, pages 189-232.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (6)
Bernard Dujon & Georges Pelletier. 2020. Trajectories of Genetics. Trajectories of Genetics
1
23
.
Ida H. Stamhuis. (2013) Why the Rediscoverer Ended up on the Sidelines: Hugo De Vries’s Theory of Inheritance and the Mendelian Laws. Science & Education 24:1-2, pages 29-49.
Crossref
Crossref
María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre. (2012) Determinism and Underdetermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices. Science & Education 23:2, pages 465-484.
Crossref
Crossref
Charles Lenay. (2000) Hugo De Vries: from the theory of intracellular pangenesis to the rediscovery of Mendel. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie 323:12, pages 1053-1060.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Olby. (2009) William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment. The British Journal for the History of Science 20:04, pages 399.
Crossref
Crossref
Margaret Campbell. (1982) Mendel's Theory: Its Context and Plausibility. Centaurus 26:1, pages 38-69.
Crossref
Crossref