144
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Public judgements of the social acceptability of silvicultural alternatives in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests

, , &
Pages 157-171 | Received 12 Aug 2009, Published online: 15 Apr 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Emily Mendham & Allan Curtis. (2019) Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 26:1, pages 25-42.
Read now
Robyn E. Scott, Mark G. Neyland & Mark J. Hovenden. (2015) Variable-retention harvesting in Tasmania: regeneration success?. Australian Forestry 78:4, pages 232-242.
Read now
RebeccaM. Ford. (2013) Contested social values in decision-making for Australian native forests. Australian Forestry 76:1, pages 37-49.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Luis E. Santiago, Jimena Forero-Montaña & Elvia J. Meléndez Ackerman. (2024) Proceed with Caution: Social Acceptability of Forestry Practices in Puerto Rico among Members of Local Environmental Organizations, Academia and Professional Associations. Environmental Management 73:5, pages 920-931.
Crossref
Sofiane Baba & Maude Brunet. (2023) Project legitimacy: Towards a theoretical framework. European Management Review.
Crossref
Lenin H. Balza, Lina M. Diaz, Nicolas Gomez-Parra & Osmel E. Manzano M.. (2023) The unwritten license: The societal SLO in Latin America’s extractive sector. Ecological Economics 213, pages 107942.
Crossref
Arne Arnberger, Paul H. Gobster, Ingrid E. Schneider, Kristin M. Floress, Anna L. Haines & Renate Eder. (2022) Landowner Acceptability of Silvicultural Treatments to Restore an Open Forest Landscape. Forests 13:5, pages 770.
Crossref
E. Ingrid van Putten, Elizabeth Pinkard, Anthony O’Grady, Rebecca K. Schmidt, Ian Cresswell, Vincent Raoult & Matt D. Taylor. (2021) Stakeholder perspectives on the value proposition of enterprise-level natural capital accounting for three primary industries. Environment Systems and Decisions 41:4, pages 541-555.
Crossref
Rebecca M. Ford, Andrea Rawluk & Kathryn J.H. Williams. (2021) What do you mean by values? Integration of social with biophysical knowledge in the development of a landscape decision support system. Environmental Science & Policy 124, pages 656-664.
Crossref
Norimasa Takayama, Sato Sanai & Yuichi Yamaura. (2020) Cognition and Evaluation of the Public Regarding Final Cutting Methods主伐方法に対する非専門家の認知・評価傾向. Journal of the Japanese Forest Society 102:3, pages 180-190.
Crossref
Melinda R. Mylek & Jacki Schirmer. (2020) Understanding acceptability of fuel management to reduce wildfire risk: Informing communication through understanding complexity of thinking. Forest Policy and Economics 113, pages 102120.
Crossref
Greg Brown, Clive McAlpine, Jonathan Rhodes, Daniel Lunney, Ross Goldingay, Kelly Fielding, Scott Hetherington, Marama Hopkins, Clare Manning, Matthew Wood, Angie Brace, Lorraine Vass & Linda Swankie. (2019) Integration of social spatial data to assess conservation opportunities and priorities. Biological Conservation 236, pages 452-463.
Crossref
Ian David Bishop. (2019) Evidence synthesis in landscape aesthetics: an honourable endeavour yet insufficient applicable knowledge. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 1:2, pages 93-108.
Crossref
Emily Mendham & Allan Curtis. (2018) Local stakeholder judgements of the social acceptability of applying environmental water in the Gunbower Island forest on the Murray River, Australia. Water Policy 20:2, pages 218-234.
Crossref
Rebecca M. Ford & Kathryn J. H. Williams. (2016) How can social acceptability research in Australian forests inform social licence to operate?. Forestry 89:5, pages 512-524.
Crossref
Brenda Salmón Rivera, Martin Barrette & Nelson Thiffault. (2016) Issues and perspectives on the use of exotic species in the sustainable management of Canadian forests. REFORESTA:1, pages 261-280.
Crossref
Martin Hallinger, Victor Johansson, Martin Schmalholz, Samuel Sjöberg & Thomas Ranius. (2016) Factors driving tree mortality in retained forest fragments. Forest Ecology and Management 368, pages 163-172.
Crossref
Dave Kendal, Rebecca M. Ford, Nerida M. Anderson & Alison Farrar. (2015) The VALS: A new tool to measure people's general valued attributes of landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 163, pages 224-233.
Crossref
Nicholas Gill, Olivia Dun, Chris Brennan-Horley & Christine Eriksen. (2015) Landscape Preferences, Amenity, and Bushfire Risk in New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Management 56:3, pages 738-753.
Crossref
Robert G. Ribe, Rebecca M. Ford & Kathryn J.H. Williams. (2013) Clearfell controversies and alternative timber harvest designs: How acceptability perceptions vary between Tasmania and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Journal of Environmental Management 114, pages 46-62.
Crossref
Liam Hindrum, Mark J. Hovenden, Mark G. Neyland & Susan C. Baker. (2012) The effects of mechanical disturbance and burn intensity on the floristic composition of two-year old aggregated retention coupes in Tasmanian wet eucalypt forests. Forest Ecology and Management 279, pages 55-65.
Crossref
Robert L. Ryan. (2012) The influence of landscape preference and environmental education on public attitudes toward wildfire management in the Northeast pine barrens (USA). Landscape and Urban Planning 107:1, pages 55-68.
Crossref
Robyn E. Scott, Mark G. Neyland, David J. McElwee & Susan C. Baker. (2012) Burning outcomes following aggregated retention harvesting in old-growth wet eucalypt forests. Forest Ecology and Management 276, pages 165-173.
Crossref
Jordan W. Smith, Christos Siderelis, Roger L. Moore & Dorothy H. Anderson. (2012) The effects of place meanings and social capital on desired forest management outcomes: A stated preference experiment. Landscape and Urban Planning 106:2, pages 207-218.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.