Citations (56)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Guro Vasdal, Judit Vas, Ruth C. Newberry & Randi Oppermann Moe. (2019) Effects of environmental enrichment on activity and lameness in commercial broiler production. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 22:2, pages 197-205.
Read now
Read now
LauraM. Dixon & Ian
J. H. Duncan. (2010) Changes in Substrate Access Did Not Affect Early Feather-Pecking Behavior in Two Strains of Laying Hen Chicks. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 13:1, pages 1-14.
Read now
Read now
C.A. Weeks & C.J. Nicol. (2006) Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 62:2, pages 296-307.
Read now
Read now
V. Guesdon, A.M.H. Ahmed, S. Mallet, J.M. Faure & Y. Nys. (2006) Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality. British Poultry Science 47:1, pages 1-12.
Read now
Read now
C.J. Savory & J.S. Mann. (1999) Feather pecking in groups of growing bantams in relation to floor substrate and plumage colour. British Poultry Science 40:5, pages 565-572.
Read now
Read now
S. F. Smith, M. C. Appleby & B. O. Hughes. (1993) Nesting and dust bathing by hens in cages: Matching and mis‐matching between behaviour and environment. British Poultry Science 34:1, pages 21-33.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (50)
Judit Vas, Neila BenSassi, Guro Vasdal & Ruth C. Newberry. (2023) Better welfare for broiler chickens given more types of environmental enrichments and more space to enjoy them. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 261, pages 105901.
Crossref
Crossref
Elizabeth S. Paul, William Browne, Michael T. Mendl, Gina Caplen, Suzanne Held, Anna Trevarthen & Christine J. Nicol. (2023) Affective trajectories: Are hens influenced by positive and negative changes in their living conditions?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 261, pages 105883.
Crossref
Crossref
Regine Victoria Holt, Judit Vas, Guro Vasdal & Ruth C. Newberry. (2023) A buffet of litters – Broiler chickens behave differently according to litter type and freshness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 260, pages 105856.
Crossref
Crossref
Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Dominique Joseph Bicout, Paolo Calistri, Elisabetta Canali, Julian Ashley Drewe, Bruno Garin‐Bastuji, Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas, Christian Gortázar Schmidt, Mette Herskin, Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca, Barbara Padalino, Paolo Pasquali, Helen Clare Roberts, Hans Spoolder, Karl Stahl, Antonio Velarde, Arvo Viltrop, Christoph Winckler, Inmaculada Estevez, Maryse Guinebretière, Bas Rodenburg, Lars Schrader, Inga Tiemann, Thea Van Niekerk, Michele Ardizzone, Sean Ashe, Michaela Hempen, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Cristina Rojo Gimeno, Yves Van der Stede, Marika Vitali & Virginie Michel. (2023) Welfare of laying hens on farm. EFSA Journal 21:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Elizabeth S. Paul, William Browne, Michael T. Mendl, Gina Caplen, Anna Trevarthen, Suzanne Held & Christine J. Nicol. (2022) Assessing animal welfare: a triangulation of preference, judgement bias and other candidate welfare indicators. Animal Behaviour 186, pages 151-177.
Crossref
Crossref
Valerie Monckton, Jennifer L. Ellis & Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek. (2020) Floor Substrate Preferences of Chickens: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Judit Vas, Neila BenSassi, Guro Vasdal & Ruth C. Newberry. (2020) Rewarding memories? Behaviour of broiler chickens towards peat in flocks with and without previous exposure to peat. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 232, pages 105129.
Crossref
Crossref
Valerie Monckton, Nienke van Staaveren & Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek. (2020) Broiler Chicks’ Motivation for Different Wood Beddings and Amounts of Soiling. Animals 10:6, pages 1039.
Crossref
Crossref
M. Baxter, C.L. Bailie & N.E. O’Connell. (2019) Play behaviour, fear responses and activity levels in commercial broiler chickens provided with preferred environmental enrichments. Animal 13:1, pages 171-179.
Crossref
Crossref
Carley L. Bailie, Mary Baxter & Niamh E. O’Connell. (2018) Exploring perch provision options for commercial broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 200, pages 114-122.
Crossref
Crossref
Mary Baxter, Carley L. Bailie & Niamh E. O’Connell. (2018) Evaluation of a dustbathing substrate and straw bales as environmental enrichments in commercial broiler housing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 200, pages 78-85.
Crossref
Crossref
M. Baxter, C.L. Bailie & N.E. O’Connell. (2018) An evaluation of potential dustbathing substrates for commercial broiler chickens. Animal 12:9, pages 1933-1941.
Crossref
Crossref
Yuko Moroki & Toshio Tanaka. (2016) Stimuli from feed for sham dustbathing in caged laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 181, pages 122-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Maryse Guinebretière, Virginie Michel & Cécile Arnould. (2015) Dustbathing, pecking and scratching behaviours of laying hens in furnished cages are enhanced by the presence of rubber mats and litter distribution. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 171, pages 128-137.
Crossref
Crossref
Si-Nae Cheon, Jun-Yeob Lee, Hee-Chul Choi & Jung-Hwan Jeon. (2015) A Review of Laying Hens' Behavior. Korean Journal of Poultry Science 42:2, pages 169-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Maryse Guinebretière, Helen Beyer, Cécile Arnould & Virginie Michel. (2014) The choice of litter material to promote pecking, scratching and dustbathing behaviours in laying hens housed in furnished cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 155, pages 56-65.
Crossref
Crossref
A Villagrá, I Olivas, RL Althaus, EA Gómez, M Lainez & AG Torres. (2014) Behavior of broiler chickens in four different substrates: a choice test. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 16:1, pages 67-75.
Crossref
Crossref
Laura Breitsameter, Matthias Gauly & Johannes Isselstein. (2014) Sward botanical composition and sward quality affect the foraging behaviour of free-range laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 150, pages 27-36.
Crossref
Crossref
D.L. Everett, Y. Vizzier-Th, C.D. McDaniel & A.S. Kiess. (2013) The Impact of Peat Moss Amendments on the Microbial Load in Used Pine Shaving Poultry Litter. International Journal of Poultry Science 12:4, pages 202-205.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Villagrá, I. Olivas, V. Benitez & M. Lainez. (2011) Evaluation of sludge from paper recycling as bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science 90:5, pages 953-957.
Crossref
Crossref
LM Dixon, IJH Duncan & GJ Mason. (2023) The effects of four types of enrichment on feather-pecking behaviour in laying hens housed in barren environments. Animal Welfare 19:4, pages 429-435.
Crossref
Crossref
B. Scholz, S. Urselmans, J.B. Kjaer & L. Schrader. (2010) Food, wood, or plastic as substrates for dustbathing and foraging in laying hens: A preference test. Poultry Science 89:8, pages 1584-1589.
Crossref
Crossref
A Wichman & LJ Keeling. (2023) The influence of losing or gaining access to peat on the dustbathing behaviour of laying hens. Animal Welfare 18:2, pages 149-157.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Moesta, Ute Knierim, Andreas Briese & Jörg Hartung. (2008) The effect of litter condition and depth on the suitability of wood shavings for dustbathing behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 115:3-4, pages 160-170.
Crossref
Crossref
Laura Marie Dixon. (2008) Feather Pecking Behaviour and associated Welfare issues in Laying Hens. Avian Biology Research 1:2, pages 73-87.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Wichman & L.J. Keeling. (2008) Hens are motivated to dustbathe in peat irrespective of being reared with or without a suitable dustbathing substrate. Animal Behaviour 75:4, pages 1525-1533.
Crossref
Crossref
Ruth C. Newberry, Linda J. Keeling, Inma Estevez & Boris Bilčík. (2007) Behaviour when young as a predictor of severe feather pecking in adult laying hens: The redirected foraging hypothesis revisited. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107:3-4, pages 262-274.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek, Isabel Benda, Corina Lavetti, Mirjana Djukic & Werner Bessei. (2007) The relative preferences for wood shavings or feathers in high and low feather pecking birds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 107:1-2, pages 78-87.
Crossref
Crossref
Ingrid C. de Jong, Maaike Wolthuis-Fillerup & Cornelis G. van Reenen. (2007) Strength of preference for dustbathing and foraging substrates in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 104:1-2, pages 24-36.
Crossref
Crossref
RJN Merrill, JJ Cooper, MJ Albentosa & CJ Nicol. (2023) The preferences of laying hens for perforated Astroturf over conventional wire as a dustbathing substrate in furnished cages. Animal Welfare 15:2, pages 173-178.
Crossref
Crossref
S.J. Shields, J.P. Garner & J.A. Mench. (2005) Effect of sand and wood-shavings bedding on the behavior of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 84:12, pages 1816-1824.
Crossref
Crossref
I. Anna S. Olsson & Linda J. Keeling. (2005) Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93:3-4, pages 259-282.
Crossref
Crossref
RJN Merrill & CJ Nicol. (2023) The effects of novel floorings on dustbathing, pecking and scratching behaviour of caged hens. Animal Welfare 14:3, pages 179-186.
Crossref
Crossref
. (2005) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to the welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens. EFSA Journal 3:3, pages 197.
Crossref
Crossref
Sara J Shields, Joseph P Garner & Joy A Mench. (2004) Dustbathing by broiler chickens: a comparison of preference for four different substrates. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 87:1-2, pages 69-82.
Crossref
Crossref
C Arnould, D Bizeray, JM Faure & C Leterrier. (2023) Effects of the addition of sand and string to pens on use of space, activity, tarsal angulations and bone composition in broiler chickens. Animal Welfare 13:1, pages 87-94.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathryn A.L. Bayne, Bonnie V. Beaver, Joy A. Mench & David B. Morton. 2002. Laboratory Animal Medicine. Laboratory Animal Medicine
1239
1264
.
Birgitte H. Larsen, Klaus S. Vestergaard & Jerry A. Hogan. (2000) Development of dustbathing behavior sequences in the domestic fowl: The significance of functional experience. Developmental Psychobiology 37:1, pages 5-12.
Crossref
Crossref
Tina M Widowski & Ian J.H Duncan. (2000) Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68:1, pages 39-53.
Crossref
Crossref
E Ludes-Fraulob & J R Anderson. (2023)
Behaviour and Preferences Among Deep Litters in Captive Capuchin Monkeys (
Cebus Capucinus
)
. Animal Welfare 8:2, pages 127-134.
Crossref
Crossref
Ruth C Newberry. (1999) Exploratory behaviour of young domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63:4, pages 311-321.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian J.H Duncan, Tina M Widowski, Anne E Malleau, A.Cecilia Lindberg & J.Carol Petherick. (1998) External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 43:2, pages 219-228.
Crossref
Crossref
B.O. Hughes & C.E. Channing. (1998) Effect of restricting access to litter trays on their use by caged laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56:1, pages 37-45.
Crossref
Crossref
G.S. Sanotra, K.S. Vestergaard, J.F. Agger & L.G. Lawson. (1995) The relative preferences for feathers, straw, wood-shavings and sand for dustbathing, pecking and scratching in domestic chicks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43:4, pages 263-277.
Crossref
Crossref
J. Carol Petherick, Elaine Seawright, Dave Waddington, Ian J.H. Duncan & Linda B. Murphy. (1995) The role of perception in the causation of dustbathing behaviour in domestic fowl. Animal Behaviour 49:6, pages 1521-1530.
Crossref
Crossref
Jerry A. Hogan. (1994) Structure and development of behavior systems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1:4, pages 439-450.
Crossref
Crossref
J.Carol Petherick, Elaine Seawright & Dave Waddington. (1993) Influence of motivational state on choice of food or a dustbathing/foraging substrate by domestic hens. Behavioural Processes 28:3, pages 209-220.
Crossref
Crossref
D W van Liere. (2023) The Significance of Fowls' Bathing in Dust. Animal Welfare 1:3, pages 187-202.
Crossref
Crossref
J.Carol Petherick, D. Waddington & I.J.H. Duncan. (1991) Learning to gain access to a foraging and dustbathing substrate by domestic fowl: is ‘out of sight out of mind’?. Behavioural Processes 22:3, pages 213-226.
Crossref
Crossref
J.Carol Petherick, I.J.H. Duncan & D. Waddington. (1990) Previous experience with different floors influences choice of peat in a Y-maze by domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27:1-2, pages 177-182.
Crossref
Crossref