Citations (7)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (1)
Heidi Letendre, Karelle Séguin, Annick Grenier, Vincent Mousseau, Liv Cadola & Frank Crispino. (2021) First lessons regarding the data analysis of physicochemical traces at activity level in TTADB. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal 54:3, pages 139-156.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (6)
Md Gezani Md Ghazi, Loong Chuen Lee, Hukil Sino & Mohamed Izzharif Abdul Halim. (2022) Review of contemporary chemometric strategies applied on preparing GC–MS data in forensic analysis. Microchemical Journal 181, pages 107732.
Crossref
Crossref
Robin Abel, Grzegorz Zadora, P. Sandercock & James Harynuk. (2018) Modern Instrumental Limits of Identification of Ignitable Liquids in Forensic Fire Debris Analysis. Separations 5:4, pages 58.
Crossref
Crossref
Carlos Martín-Alberca, Fernando Ernesto Ortega-Ojeda & Carmen García-Ruiz. (2016) Analytical tools for the analysis of fire debris. A review: 2008–2015. Analytica Chimica Acta 928, pages 1-19.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2016. Identifying Ignitable Liquids in Fire Debris. Identifying Ignitable Liquids in Fire Debris
125
127
.
Susan S. Hetzel. (2015) Survey of American (USA) Gasolines (2008). Journal of Forensic Sciences 60, pages S197-S206.
Crossref
Crossref
Nikolai A. Sinkov, P. Mark L. Sandercock & James J. Harynuk. (2014) Chemometric classification of casework arson samples based on gasoline content. Forensic Science International 235, pages 24-31.
Crossref
Crossref