Citations (18)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Irenka Suto, Rita Nádas & John Bell. (2011) Who should mark what? A study of factors affecting marking accuracy in a biology examination. Research Papers in Education 26:1, pages 21-51.
Read now
Read now
W.M. Irenka Suto & Rita Nádas. (2009) Why are some GCSE examination questions harder to mark accurately than others? Using Kelly's Repertory Grid technique to identify relevant question features. Research Papers in Education 24:3, pages 335-377.
Read now
Read now
W. M. Irenka Sütő & Rita Nádas. (2008) What determines GCSE marking accuracy? An exploration of expertise among maths and physics markers. Research Papers in Education 23:4, pages 477-497.
Read now
Read now
Jackie Greatorex & JohnF. Bell. (2008) What makes AS marking reliable? An experiment with some stages from the standardisation process. Research Papers in Education 23:3, pages 333-355.
Read now
Read now
W.M. Irenka Suto & Jackie Greatorex. (2008) A quantitative analysis of cognitive strategy usage in the marking of two GCSE examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 15:1, pages 73-89.
Read now
Read now
TimothyP. Mottet, StevenA. Beebe, PaulC. Raffeld & MichelleL. Paulsel. (2005) The Effects of Student Responsiveness on Teachers Granting Power to Students and Essay Evaluation. Communication Quarterly 53:4, pages 421-436.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (12)
N. Bilge Uzun, Devrim Alici & Mehtap Aktas. (2019) Reliability of the Analytic Rubric and Checklist for the Assessment of Story Writing Skills: G and Decision Study in Generalizability Theory. European Journal of Educational Research volume-8-2019:volume8-issue1.html, pages 169-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Yu Zhu, Shui-Lung Fung, Shek-Kam Tse & Chi-Yi Hsieh. 2017. Chinese as a Second Language Assessment. Chinese as a Second Language Assessment
203
223
.
Irenka Suto. (2012) A Critical Review of Some Qualitative Research Methods Used to Explore Rater Cognition. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 31:3, pages 21-30.
Crossref
Crossref
Gavin T. L. Brown. (2010) The Validity of Examination Essays in Higher Education: Issues and Responses. Higher Education Quarterly 64:3, pages 276-291.
Crossref
Crossref
Anne Pinot de Moira, Claire Massey, Jo-Anne Baird & Marie Morrissy. (2016) Marking Consistency over Time. Research in Education 67:1, pages 79-87.
Crossref
Crossref
Francie Jeffery & Bonita Selting. (1999) Reading the invisible ink: Assessing the responses of non-composition faculty. Assessing Writing 6:2, pages 179-197.
Crossref
Crossref
Bruce W. Speck. (2002) Unveiling Some of the Mystery of Professional Judgment in Classroom Assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1998:74, pages 17-31.
Crossref
Crossref
Eleanor Agnew. (1995) Rigorous grading does not raise standards: It only lowers grades. Assessing Writing 2:1, pages 91-103.
Crossref
Crossref
Gisli H. Gudjonsson, Hannes Petursson, Heiddis Sigurdardottir & Sigurgisli Skulason. (1991) Overcontrolled hostility among prisoners and its relationship with denial and personality scores. Personality and Individual Differences 12:1, pages 17-20.
Crossref
Crossref
Gisli H. Gudjonsson. (1990) Self-deception and other-deception in forensic assessment. Personality and Individual Differences 11:3, pages 219-225.
Crossref
Crossref
Menucha Birenbaum. (2016) Effect of Dissimulation Motivation and Anxiety on Response Pattern Appropriateness Measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 10:2, pages 167-174.
Crossref
Crossref
Frank J. O'Hagan & George Edmunds. (1982) Teachers' observations on pupils' untruthfulness in relation to the ‘Lie’ scale. Personality and Individual Differences 3:3, pages 335-338.
Crossref
Crossref