Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis Volume 33, 1985 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
92
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Response Criterion Problem in Tests of Hypnosis and Memory

Roberta L. Klatzky University of California, Santa Barbara
&
Matthew H. Erdelyi Brooklyn College, City University of New York,
Pages 246-257 | Received 13 Jun 1983, Accepted 02 Jul 1984, Published online: 31 Jan 2008

Citations (52)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (7)

ElizabethA. Olson & SteveD. Charman. (2012) ‘But can you prove it?’ – examining the quality of innocent suspects' alibis. Psychology, Crime & Law 18:5, pages 453-471.
Read now
Young Don Pyun & Yun Joo Kim. (2009) Experimental Production of Past-Life Memories in Hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 57:3, pages 269-278.
Read now
Laura A. Murray. (1999) Mood Congruence and Depressive Deficits in Memory: A Forced-recall Analysis. Memory 7:2, pages 175-196.
Read now
Campbell Perry, MartinT. Orne, Ray William London & Emily Carota Orne. (1996) Rethinking per se exclusions of hypnotically elicited recall as legal testimow. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 44:1, pages 66-81.
Read now
Jane Dywan. (1995) The illusion of familiarity: An alternative to the report-criterion account of hypnotic recall. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 43:2, pages 194-211.
Read now
Matthew Hugh Erdelyi. (1994) Hypnotic Hypermnesia: The Empty Set of Hypermnesia. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 42:4, pages 379-390.
Read now
KarenL. Grabowski, NealJ. Roese & MichaelR. Thomas. (1991) The Role of Expectancy in Hypnotic Hypermnesia: A Brief Communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 39:4, pages 193-197.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (44)

Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv, Timo L. Kvamme, Kristine Rømer Thomsen, Rikke Overgaard & Morten Overgaard. (2023) Hypnosis for acquired brain injury: Four patient cases and five testable predictions. New Ideas in Psychology 71, pages 101046.
Crossref
Michael Pauen & John-Dylan Haynes. (2021) Measuring the mental. Consciousness and Cognition 90, pages 103106.
Crossref
Anastasia Kononova, Eunsin Joo & Shupei Yuan. (2016) If I choose when to switch: Heavy multitaskers remember online content better than light multitaskers when they have the freedom to multitask. Computers in Human Behavior 65, pages 567-575.
Crossref
David Spiegel. 2009. Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science.
Morris Goldsmith & Asher Koriat. 2007. Skill and Strategy in Memory Use. Skill and Strategy in Memory Use 1 60 .
D. Koren, L. J Seidman, M. Goldsmith & P. D Harvey. (2006) Real-World Cognitive--and Metacognitive--Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: A New Approach for Measuring (and Remediating) More "Right Stuff". Schizophrenia Bulletin 32:2, pages 310-326.
Crossref
S. COSENTINO & Y. STERN. (2005) Metacognitive theory and assessment in dementia: Do we recognize our areas of weakness?. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 11:07.
Crossref
Philip A. Higham & Helen Tam. (2005) Generation failure: Estimating metacognition in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language 52:4, pages 595-617.
Crossref
Wayne T. Roberts & Philip A. Higham. (2002) Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8:1, pages 33-43.
Crossref
Philip A. Higham. (2002) Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited. Memory & Cognition 30:1, pages 67-80.
Crossref
Alan Scoboria, Giuliana Mazzoni, Irving Kirsch & Leonard S. Milling. (2002) Immediate and persisting effects of misleading questions and hypnosis on memory reports.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8:1, pages 26-32.
Crossref
Harold Stanislaw & Natasha Todorov. (1999) Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31:1, pages 137-149.
Crossref
Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith. (2010) The correspondence metaphor of memory: Right, wrong, or useful?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 211-228.
Crossref
Daniel B. Wright. (2010) Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 210-211.
Crossref
Eugene Winograd. (2010) Contexts and functions of retrieval. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 209-210.
Crossref
K. Geoffrey White. (2010) Direct remembering and the correspondence metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 208-209.
Crossref
Jocelyn Penny Small. (2010) Classical antecedents for modern metaphors for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 208-208.
Crossref
Bennett L. Schwartz. (2010) Amnesia and metamemory demonstrate the importance of both metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 207-207.
Crossref
David C. Palmer. (2010) Operationaling “correspondence”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 206-207.
Crossref
Ian R. Newby & Michael Ross. (2010) Beyond the correspondence metaphor: When accuracy cannot be assessed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 205-206.
Crossref
Thomas O. Nelson. (2010) Metacognition, metaphors, and the measurement of human memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 204-205.
Crossref
Ulric Neisser. (2010) Remembering as doing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 203-204.
Crossref
Timothy P. McNamara. (2010) False dichotomies and dead metaphors. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 203-203.
Crossref
Giuliana Mazzoni. (2010) The phenomenal object of memory and control processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 202-203.
Crossref
Andrew R. Mayes, Rob van Eijk & Patricia L. Gooding. (2010) Accuracy and quantity are poor measures of recall and recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 201-202.
Crossref
Steen F. Larsen. (2010) Correspondence to the past: The essence of the archaeology metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 200-201.
Crossref
Lia Kvavilashvili & Judi Ellis. (2010) Let's forget the everyday/laboratory controversy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 199-200.
Crossref
Arie W. Kruglanski. (2010) The storehouse/correspondence partition in memory research: Promises and perils. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 198-199.
Crossref
Keith S. Karn & Gregory J. Zelinsky. (2010) Driving and dish-washing: Failure of the correspondence metaphor for memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 198-198.
Crossref
Ronald P. Fisher. (2010) Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 197-197.
Crossref
Howard Eichenbaum. (2010) The real-life/laboratory controversy as viewed from the cognitive neurobiology of animal learning and memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 196-197.
Crossref
Martin A. Conway. (2010) What do memories correspond to?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 195-196.
Crossref
Darryl Bruce. (2010) The correspondence metaphor: Prescriptive or descriptive?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 194-195.
Crossref
Robert A. Bjork & Thomas D. Wickens. (2010) Memory, metamemory, and conditional statistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 193-194.
Crossref
Aaron Ben-Ze'ev. (2010) The alternative to the storehouse metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 192-193.
Crossref
Ian Maynard Begg. (2010) On correspondence, accuracy, and truth. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 191-192.
Crossref
Harry P. Bahrick. (2010) The relation between reproductive and reconstructive processing of memory content. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 191-191.
Crossref
Norman H. Anderson. (2010) Functional memory requires a quite different value metaphor. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 190-191.
Crossref
Richard Alterman. (2010) Everyday memory and activity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 189-190.
Crossref
Daniel Algom. (2010) Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 188-189.
Crossref
Asher Koriat & Morris Goldsmith. (2010) Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:2, pages 167-188.
Crossref
Udo Rudolph. (2006) The self‐reference effect: Methodological issues and implications from a schema‐theoretical perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology 23:4, pages 331-354.
Crossref
Henry L. RoedigerIIIIII, Mark A. Wheeler & Suparna Rajaram. 1993. 97 134 .
Jeanette Krass, Sachiko Kinoshita & Kevin M. McConkey. (2006) Hypnotic memory and confident reporting. Applied Cognitive Psychology 3:1, pages 35-51.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.