252
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CASE STUDY

Biomind — A new biology curriculum that enables authentic inquiry learning

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 59-67 | Published online: 13 Dec 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Carolina N. Spiegel, Gutemberg G. Alves, Tâ da S. Cardona, Leandra M. C. Melim, Mauricio R. M. Luz, Tania C. Araújo-Jorge & Andrea Henriques-Pons. (2008) Discovering the cell: an educational game about cell and molecular biology. Journal of Biological Education 43:1, pages 27-36.
Read now
Hedda Falk, Gilat Brill & Anat Yarden. (2008) Teaching a Biotechnology Curriculum Based on Adapted Primary Literature. International Journal of Science Education 30:14, pages 1841-1866.
Read now
M.ichal Zion & Irit Sadeh. (2007) Curiosity and open inquiry learning. Journal of Biological Education 41:4, pages 162-169.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (16)

A. C. Cooper, K. M. Southard, J. B. Osness & M. S. Bolger. (2022) The Instructor’s Role in a Model-Based Inquiry Laboratory: Characterizing Instructor Supports and Intentions in Teaching Authentic Scientific Practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education 21:1.
Crossref
Maura A. E. Pilotti & Runna Al Ghazo. (2020) Sustainable Education Starts in the Classroom. Sustainability 12:22, pages 9573.
Crossref
Michal Zion, Renee S. Schwartz, Esther Rimerman-Shmueli & Idit Adler. (2018) Supporting Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science and Inquiry Through Personal Experience and Perception of Inquiry as a Dynamic Process. Research in Science Education 50:4, pages 1281-1304.
Crossref
Idit Adler, Michal Zion & Esther Rimerman-Shmueli. (2019) Fostering Teachers’ Reflections on the Dynamic Characteristics of Open Inquiry through Metacognitive Prompts. Journal of Science Teacher Education 30:7, pages 763-787.
Crossref
Xiying Li, Liusu Wang, Jiliang Shen, Jingying Wang, Weiping Hu, Yinghe Chen & Renhe Tian. (2018) ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY ACTIVITIES IN EIGHT-GRADE PHYSICS TEXTBOOKS IN CHINA. Journal of Baltic Science Education 17:2, pages 229-238.
Crossref
Lisa C. Duffin, Michael P. Starling, Martha M. Day & Jennifer D. Cribbs. (2016) The Effects of a Consumer Chemistry Intervention on Urban At-Risk High School Students’ Performance, Utility Value, and Intentions to Pursue STEM. School Science and Mathematics 116:7, pages 356-365.
Crossref
Kamisah Osman, Lee Chuo Hiong & Rian Vebrianto. (2013) 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 102, pages 188-194.
Crossref
Irit Sadeh & Michal Zion. (2011) Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students Prefer: Open or Guided?. Research in Science Education 42:5, pages 831-848.
Crossref
Johanna G. Ferreira. (2012) Could the ‘evolution’ from biology to life sciences prevent ‘extinction’ of the subject field?. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 31:1.
Crossref
Niwat Srisawasdi. 2012. Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research 93 106 .
Irit Sadeh & Michal Zion. (2009) The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46:10, pages 1137-1160.
Crossref
Hedda Falk & Anat Yarden. (2009) “Here the Scientists Explain What I Said.” Coordination Practices Elicited During the Enactment of the Results and Discussion Sections of Adapted Primary Literature. Research in Science Education 39:3, pages 349-383.
Crossref
Michal Zion. (2007) On line Forums as a `Rescue Net' in an Open Inquiry Process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 6:2, pages 351-375.
Crossref
Michal Zion, Smadar Cohen & Ruth Amir. (2007) The Spectrum of Dynamic Inquiry Teaching Practices. Research in Science Education 37:4, pages 423-447.
Crossref
Michal Zion & Michaela Slezak. (2005) It takes two to tango: In dynamic inquiry, the self-directed student acts in association with the facilitating teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education 21:7, pages 875-894.
Crossref
M. Zion, M. Slezak, D. Shapira, E. Link, N. Bashan, M. Brumer, T. Orian, R. Nussinowitz, D. Court, B. Agrest, R. Mendelovici & N. Valanides. (2004) Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning. Science Education 88:5, pages 728-753.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.