4
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Experimental Comparison of a Conventional and a Project Centered Method of Teaching a College General Botany Course

Pages 217-230 | Published online: 30 Jan 2015

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

R.M. Garrett & I.F. Roberts. (1982) Demonstration versus Small Group Practical Work in Science Education. A critical review of studies since 1900. Studies in Science Education 9:1, pages 109-146.
Read now
Albertina A. Weinlander & Elizabeth E. Powelson. (1967) The Effect of Varying Amounts of Instructor Supervision on College Students’ Biology Laboratory Experiences. The Journal of Experimental Education 36:2, pages 88-95.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Joel J. Mintzes & James H. Wandersee. 2005. Teaching Science for Understanding. Teaching Science for Understanding 29 58 .
Joseph D. Novak. 2005. Teaching Science for Understanding. Teaching Science for Understanding 3 28 .
Joseph D. Novak, D. Bob Gowin & Gerard T. Johansen. (2006) The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education 67:5, pages 625-645.
Crossref
Rodney L. Doran. (2006) Measuring the “processes of science” objectives. Science Education 62:1, pages 19-30.
Crossref
Wilbert J. McKeachie & James A. Kulik. (2016) 6: Effective College Teaching. Review of Research in Education 3:1, pages 165-209.
Crossref
Frank Costin. (2006) Lecturing versus Other Methods of Teaching: A Review of Research. British Journal of Educational Technology 3:1, pages 4-31.
Crossref
Joseph D. Novak, Donald G. Ring & Pinchas Tamir. (2006) Interpretation of research findings in terms of ausubel's theory and implications for science education. Science Education 55:4, pages 483-526.
Crossref
Glenn W. Murphy. (2006) Content centered vs. process centered biology laboratories part IV: The relationship of high school achievement to success. Science Education 54:1, pages 41-44.
Crossref
Glenn W. Murphy. (2006) Content centered vs. process centered biology laboratories part III: The relationship of student values to success. Science Education 54:1, pages 37-40.
Crossref
Robert R. Buell. (1969) Representational and Analytic Drawing. The American Biology Teacher 31:4, pages 244-249.
Crossref
Glenn W. Murphy. (2006) Content versus process centered biology laboratories, part II: The development of knowledge, scientific attitudes, problem‐solving ability, and interest in biology. Science Education 52:2, pages 148-162.
Crossref
Glenn W. Murphy. (2006) Content versus process centered biology laboratories, part I: Foundations of biology education. Science Education 52:2, pages 142-148.
Crossref
Jerry L. Gallentine. (1968) Biological Drawing: Opinion vs. Research. The American Biology Teacher 30:2, pages 110-113.
Crossref
Manny Sternlicht. (2006) Undergraduate educational methodology: Term projects versus term papers. Science Education 49:3, pages 225-229.
Crossref
Robert G. Rainey. (2006) The effects of directed versus non‐directed laboratory work on high school chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 3:4, pages 286-292.
Crossref
William Kastrinos. (2006) The relationship of two methods of teaching to the development of critical thinking by high school students in advanced biology. Science Education 48:2, pages 187-195.
Crossref
William Kastrinos. (2006) Teaching for critical thinking in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1:4, pages 341-350.
Crossref
Joseph D. Novak. (2006) An approach to the interpretation and measurement of problem solving ability. Science Education 45:2, pages 122-131.
Crossref
Joesph D. Novak. (2006) The use of labeled photomicrographs in teaching college general botany. Science Education 45:2, pages 119-122.
Crossref
W. J. McKeachie. (2016) Chapter VI: The Improvement of Instruction. Review of Educational Research 30:4, pages 351-360.
Crossref
Arno A. Bellack & Dwayne Huebner. (2016) Chapter IV: Teaching. Review of Educational Research 30:3, pages 246-257.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.