455
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Inventory of Problems–29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 563-572 | Received 13 Jul 2018, Accepted 27 Nov 2018, Published online: 04 Feb 2019

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (11)

Adélaïde Blavier, Alice Palma, Donald J. Viglione, Alessandro Zennaro & Luciano Giromini. (2023) A Natural Experiment Design Testing the Effectiveness of the IOP-29 and IOP-M in Assessing the Credibility of Reported PTSD Symptoms in Belgium. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
Laura Cutler, Christina D. Sirianni, Kaitlyn Abeare, Matthew Holcomb & Laszlo A Erdodi. (2022) One-Minute SVT? The V-5 Is A Stronger Predictor Of Symptom Exaggeration Than Self-Reported Trauma History. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 22:5, pages 470-488.
Read now
Marzia Di Girolamo, Luciano Giromini, Jessica Bosi, Lara Warmelink, Ilaria La Scala, Caterina Loiacono, Federica Miraglia & Alessandro Zennaro. (2022) The Role Played by Theory of Mind and Empathy in the Feigning of Psychopathology. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 21:4, pages 334-347.
Read now
Jennifer Gegner, Laszlo A. Erdodi, Luciano Giromini, Donald J. Viglione, Jessica Bosi & Emanuela Brusadelli. (2022) An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 29:5, pages 1221-1230.
Read now
Guste Ilgunaite, Luciano Giromini, Jessica Bosi, Donald J. Viglione & Alessandro Zennaro. (2022) A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 29:2, pages 155-162.
Read now
Ingrid Banovic, Federica Filippi, Donald J. Viglione, Fabrizio Scrima, Alessandro Zennaro, Angelo Zappalà & Luciano Giromini. (2022) Detecting Coached Feigning of Schizophrenia with the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29) and Its Memory Module (IOP-M): A Simulation Study on a French Community Sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 21:1, pages 37-53.
Read now
Christopher A. Abeare, Jessica L. Hurtubise, Laura Cutler, Christina Sirianni, Maame Brantuo, Nadeen Makhzoum & Laszlo A. Erdodi. (2021) Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 35:8, pages 1442-1470.
Read now
Alexa Dunn, Sadie Pyne, Brad Tyson, Robert Roth, Ayman Shahein & Laszlo Erdodi. (2021) Critical Item Analysis Enhances the Classification Accuracy of the Logical Memory Recognition Trial as a Performance Validity Indicator. Developmental Neuropsychology 46:5, pages 327-346.
Read now
Christina L. Winters, Luciano Giromini, Trevor J. Crawford, Francesca Ales, Donald J. Viglione & Lara Warmelink. (2021) An Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP–29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 28:2, pages 235-254.
Read now
Luciano Giromini, Fernando Barbosa, Giulia Coga, Andreia Azeredo, Donald J. Viglione & Alessandro Zennaro. (2020) Using the inventory of problems – 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 27:6, pages 504-516.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (15)

Ali Y. E. Akca, Mehmed S. Tepedelen, Burcu Uysal & Laszlo A. Erdodi. (2023) The Inventory of Problems–29 is a Cross-Culturally Valid Symptom Validity Test: Initial Validation in a Turkish Community Sample. Psychological Injury and Law 16:3, pages 289-301.
Crossref
Iulia Crisan, Alina Matei, Diana-Luisa Avram, Cătălina Bunghez & Laszlo A. Erdodi. (2023) Full of Surprises: Performance Validity Testing in Examinees with Limited English Proficiency. Psychological Injury and Law 16:2, pages 177-198.
Crossref
Teresa I. Morales & Donald J. Viglione. (2022) Using Quantitative and Qualitative Rorschach Data within a Multi-Method, Forensic Assessment of Dissociative Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Psychological Injury and Law 16:2, pages 116-140.
Crossref
Claudia Pignolo, Luciano Giromini, Francesca Ales & Alessandro Zennaro. (2021) Detection of Feigning of Different Symptom Presentations With the PAI and IOP-29. Assessment 30:3, pages 565-579.
Crossref
Francesca Ales, Luciano Giromini, Lara Warmelink, Megan Polden, Thomas Wilcockson, Claire Kelly, Christina Winters, Alessandro Zennaro & Trevor Crawford. (2022) On the Use of Eye Movements in Symptom Validity Assessment of Feigned Schizophrenia. Psychological Injury and Law 16:1, pages 83-97.
Crossref
Thomas Merten, Brechje Dandachi-FitzGerald, Vicki Hall, Thomas Bodner, Luciano Giromini, Johann Lehrner, Héctor González-Ordi, Pablo Santamaría, Ben Schmand & Giuseppe Di Stefano. (2021) Symptom and Performance Validity Assessment in European Countries: an Update. Psychological Injury and Law 15:2, pages 116-127.
Crossref
Luciano Giromini, Gerald Young & Martin Sellbom. (2022) Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles, New Issues. Psychological Injury and Law 15:1, pages 1-21.
Crossref
Luciano Giromini & Donald J. Viglione. (2022) Assessing Negative Response Bias with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): a Quantitative Literature Review. Psychological Injury and Law 15:1, pages 79-93.
Crossref
Maja Maša Šömen, Staša Lesjak, Teja Majaron, Luca Lavopa, Luciano Giromini, Donald Viglione & Anja Podlesek. (2021) Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in Malingering-Related Assessments: a Study with a Slovenian Sample of Experimental Feigners. Psychological Injury and Law 14:2, pages 104-113.
Crossref
Luciano Giromini, Claudia Pignolo, Gerald Young, Eric Y. Drogin, Alessandro Zennaro & Donald J. Viglione. (2021) Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29. Psychological Injury and Law 14:2, pages 77-88.
Crossref
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho, Ana Reis, Maíra Stivaleti Colombarolli, Sonia Regina Pasian, Fabiano Koich Miguel, Laszlo A. Erdodi, Donald J. Viglione & Luciano Giromini. (2021) Discriminating Feigned from Credible PTSD Symptoms: a Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law 14:1, pages 58-70.
Crossref
Luciano Giromini, Donald J. Viglione, Alessandro Zennaro, Anna Maffei & Laszlo A. Erdodi. (2020) SVT Meets PVT: Development and Initial Validation of the Inventory of Problems – Memory (IOP-M). Psychological Injury and Law 13:3, pages 261-274.
Crossref
Erika J. Wolf, Stephanie Ellickson-Larew, Rachel E. Guetta, Shaline Escarfulleri, Karen Ryabchenko & Mark W. Miller. (2020) Psychometric Performance of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) in Veteran PTSD Assessment. Psychological Injury and Law 13:3, pages 284-302.
Crossref
Paolo Roma, Luciano Giromini, Franco Burla, Stefano Ferracuti, Donald J. Viglione & Cristina Mazza. (2019) Ecological Validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): an Italian Study of Court-Ordered, Psychological Injury Evaluations Using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) as Criterion Variable. Psychological Injury and Law 13:1, pages 57-65.
Crossref
Luciano Giromini, Sharon Carfora Lettieri, Salvatore Zizolfi, Daniele Zizolfi, Donald J. Viglione, Emanuela Brusadelli, Barbara Perfetti, Daniela Angiola di Carlo & Alessandro Zennaro. (2019) Beyond Rare-Symptoms Endorsement: a Clinical Comparison Simulation Study Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law 12:3-4, pages 212-224.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.