Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Psychology
Interdisciplinary and Applied
Volume 102, 1979 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
13
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Relative Effects of Eye-Gaze and Smiling on Arousal in Asocial Situations

W. Wade Martin Departments of Psychology and Sociology, The Catholic University of America, USA
&
Susan N. Gardner Departments of Psychology and Sociology, The Catholic University of America, USA
Pages 253-259 | Received 30 Apr 1979, Published online: 02 Jul 2010

Citations (8)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (1)

Wade Martin & Marta Rovira. (1982) Response Biases in Eye-Gaze Perception. The Journal of Psychology 110:2, pages 203-209.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (7)

Jari K. Hietanen, Anneli Kylliäinen & Mikko J. Peltola. (2019) The effect of being watched on facial EMG and autonomic activity in response to another individual’s facial expressions. Scientific Reports 9:1.
Crossref
Sarah F. van der Land, Lotte M. Willemsen & Suzanne A. J. Unkel. 2015. HCI in Business. HCI in Business 175 184 .
Sarah van der Land & Daan G. Muntinga. 2014. HCI in Business. HCI in Business 257 265 .
Terhi M. Helminen, Suvi M. Kaasinen & Jari K. Hietanen. (2011) Eye contact and arousal: The effects of stimulus duration. Biological Psychology 88:1, pages 124-130.
Crossref
Matthias J. Wieser, Paul Pauli, Georg W. Alpers & Andreas Mühlberger. (2009) Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety?—An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 23:1, pages 93-103.
Crossref
Gillian Porter, Bruce M Hood, Tom Troscianko & C Neil Macrae. (2016) Females, but Not Males, Show Greater Pupillary Response to Direct-Than Deviated-Gaze Faces. Perception 35:8, pages 1129-1136.
Crossref
PETER A. ANDERSEN, LAURA K. GUERRERO, DAVID B. BULLER & PETER F. JORGENSEN. (1998) An Empirical Comparison of Three Theories of Nonverbal Immediacy Exchange. Human Communication Research 24:4, pages 501-535.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.