1,149
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring Response Styles Across the Big Five: A Multiscale Extension of an Approach Using Multinomial Processing Trees

&

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (9)

Stefanie A. Wind & Yuan Ge. (2023) Identifying Response Styles Using Person Fit Analysis and Response-Styles Models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 21:3, pages 147-166.
Read now
Allison J. Ames & Brian C. Leventhal. (2022) Modeling Changes in Response Style with Longitudinal IRTree Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research 57:5, pages 859-878.
Read now
Hui-Fang Chen & Kuan-Yu Jin. (2022) The Impact of Item Feature and Response Preference in a Mixed-Format Design. Multivariate Behavioral Research 57:2-3, pages 208-222.
Read now
Nina Menezes Cunha, Andres Martinez, Patrick Kyllonen & Sarah Gates. (2021) Cross-country comparability of a social-emotional skills assessment designed for youth in low-resource environments. International Journal of Testing 21:3-4, pages 182-219.
Read now
Joshua Starr, Carl F. Falk, Scott Lee Monroe & David D. Vachon. (2021) A Comparison of Limited-Information Test Statistics for a Response Style MIRT Model. Multivariate Behavioral Research 56:4, pages 687-702.
Read now
HyeSun Lee, Weldon Smith, Angel Martinez, Heather Ferris & Joe Bova. (2021) Development and Use of Anchoring Vignettes: Psychometric Investigations and Recommendations for a Nonparametric Approach. Applied Measurement in Education 34:3, pages 204-222.
Read now
Hansjörg Plieninger & Daniel W. Heck. (2018) A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research 53:5, pages 633-654.
Read now
Sien Deng, Danielle E. McCarthy, Megan E. Piper, Timothy B. Baker & Daniel M. Bolt. (2018) Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect. Multivariate Behavioral Research 53:2, pages 199-218.
Read now
Dirk Lubbe & Christof Schuster. (2017) The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style. Multivariate Behavioral Research 52:5, pages 616-629.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (52)

Grace W.K. Ho, Ko Ling Chan, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Hong Wang Fung & Mark Shevlin. (2024) Prevalence and validity of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD: A population-based survey of Hong Kong adults. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 96, pages 104045.
Crossref
Viola Merhof & Thorsten Meiser. (2024) Co-occurring dominance and ideal point processes: A general IRTree framework for multidimensional item responding. Behavior Research Methods.
Crossref
Tamilka Bonjeer & Hana Vonkova. (2023) Relationships Between Response Styles and the Hofstede and GLOBE Dimensions of Culture in a Sample of Adolescents From 33 Countries. Cross-Cultural Research 58:2-3, pages 180-207.
Crossref
Viola Merhof, Caroline M. Böhm & Thorsten Meiser. (2023) Separation of Traits and Extreme Response Style in IRTree Models: The Role of Mimicry Effects for the Meaningful Interpretation of Estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Crossref
Viola Merhof & Thorsten Meiser. (2023) Dynamic Response Strategies: Accounting for Response Process Heterogeneity in IRTree Decision Nodes. Psychometrika 88:4, pages 1354-1380.
Crossref
Victoria L. Quirk & Justin L. Kern. (2023) Using IRTree Models to Promote Selection Validity in the Presence of Extreme Response Styles. Journal of Intelligence 11:11, pages 216.
Crossref
Esther UlitzschOliver LüdtkeAlexander Robitzsch. (2023) The Role of Response Style Adjustments in Cross‐Country Comparisons—A Case Study Using Data from the PISA 2015 Questionnaire. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 42:3, pages 65-79.
Crossref
Weicong Lyu, Daniel M. Bolt & Samuel Westby. (2023) Exploring the Effects of Item-Specific Factors in Sequential and IRTree Models. Psychometrika 88:3, pages 745-775.
Crossref
Mirka Henninger, Hansjörg Plieninger & Thorsten Meiser. (2023) The Effect of Response Formats on Response Style Strength. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
Crossref
Allison J. Ames & Brian C. Leventhal. (2021) Application of a Longitudinal IRTree Model: Response Style Changes Over Time. Assessment 30:2, pages 332-347.
Crossref
Philseok Lee, Sean Joo & Zihao Jia. (2022) Cross‐cultural differences in the use of the “ ? ” Response category of the Job Descriptive Index: An application of the item response tree model . International Journal of Selection and Assessment 31:1, pages 175-188.
Crossref
Mirka Henninger & Thorsten Meiser. 2023. International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) 331 340 .
Katherine Reynolds, Lale Khorramdel & Matthias von Davier. (2022) Can students’ attitudes towards mathematics and science be compared across countries? Evidence from measurement invariance modeling in TIMSS 2019. Studies in Educational Evaluation 74, pages 101169.
Crossref
Kuan-Yu Jin, Yi-Jhen Wu & Hui-Fang Chen. (2021) A New Multiprocess IRT Model With Ideal Points for Likert-Type Items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 47:3, pages 297-321.
Crossref
Allison J. Ames. (2021) Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees. Educational and Psychological Measurement 82:2, pages 281-306.
Crossref
Gerhard Tutz. (2021) Ordinal regression: A review and a taxonomy of models. WIREs Computational Statistics 14:2.
Crossref
Weicong Lyu & Daniel M. Bolt. (2021) A psychometric model for respondent‐level anchoring on self‐report rating scale instruments. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 75:1, pages 116-135.
Crossref
Hansjörg Plieninger. (2020) Developing and Applying IR-Tree Models: Guidelines, Caveats, and an Extension to Multiple Groups. Organizational Research Methods 24:3, pages 654-670.
Crossref
Seang‐Hwane Joo, Lale Khorramdel, Kentaro Yamamoto, Hyo Jeong Shin & Frederic Robin. (2020) Evaluating Item Fit Statistic Thresholds in PISA: Analysis of Cross‐Country Comparability of Cognitive Items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 40:2, pages 37-48.
Crossref
Gerhard Tutz. (2020) Hierarchical Models for the Analysis of Likert Scales in Regression and Item Response Analysis. International Statistical Review 89:1, pages 18-35.
Crossref
Gerhard Tutz. (2020) On the structure of ordered latent trait models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 96, pages 102346.
Crossref
Carl F. Falk & Unhee Ju. (2020) Estimation of Response Styles Using the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model: A Tutorial and Comparison With Sum Scores. Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Crossref
Kuan-Yu Jin & Hui-Fang Chen. (2019) MIMIC approach to assessing differential item functioning with control of extreme response style. Behavior Research Methods 52:1, pages 23-35.
Crossref
Dirk Lubbe & Christof Schuster. (2019) A Scaled Threshold Model for Measuring Extreme Response Style. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 45:1, pages 86-107.
Crossref
María Elena Oliveri. 2020. Higher Education Admissions Practices. Higher Education Admissions Practices 1 118 .
Matthias von Davier & Hak Ping Tam. 2020. Higher Education Admissions Practices. Higher Education Admissions Practices 18 33 .
Ulf Böckenholt. (2019) Contextual Responses to Affirmative and/or Reversed-Worded Items. Psychometrika 84:4, pages 986-999.
Crossref
Lale Khorramdel, Minjeong Jeon & Lihshing Leigh Wang. (2019) Advances in modelling response styles and related phenomena. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 72:3, pages 393-400.
Crossref
Minjeong Jeon & Paul De Boeck. (2019) Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 72:3, pages 517-537.
Crossref
Lale Khorramdel, Matthias von Davier & Artur Pokropek. (2019) Combining mixture distribution and multidimensional IRTree models for the measurement of extreme response styles. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 72:3, pages 538-559.
Crossref
Ulf Böckenholt. (2019) Assessing item‐feature effects with item response tree models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 72:3, pages 486-500.
Crossref
Thorsten Meiser, Hansjörg Plieninger & Mirka Henninger. (2019) IRT ree models with ordinal and multidimensional decision nodes for response styles and trait‐based rating responses . British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 72:3, pages 501-516.
Crossref
Minjeong Park & Amery D. Wu. (2019) Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 79:5, pages 911-930.
Crossref
Laura M. S. Dekkers, Anika Bexkens, Abe D. Hofman, Paul De Boeck, Annematt L. Collot d’Escury & Hilde M. Huizenga. (2017) Formal Modeling of the Resistance to Peer Influence Questionnaire: A Comparison of Adolescent Boys and Girls With and Without Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability. Assessment 26:6, pages 1070-1083.
Crossref
Unhee Ju & Carl F. Falk. (2019) Modeling Response Styles in Cross‐Country Self‐Reports: An Application of a Multilevel Multidimensional Nominal Response Model. Journal of Educational Measurement 56:1, pages 169-191.
Crossref
Jesper Tijmstra, Maria Bolsinova & Minjeong Jeon. (2018) General mixture item response models with different item response structures: Exposition with an application to Likert scales. Behavior Research Methods 50:6, pages 2325-2344.
Crossref
Kuan‐Yu Jin & Wen‐Chung Wang. (2018) A New Facets Model for Rater's Centrality/Extremity Response Style. Journal of Educational Measurement 55:4, pages 543-563.
Crossref
Gerhard Tutz, Gunther Schauberger & Moritz Berger. (2018) Response Styles in the Partial Credit Model. Applied Psychological Measurement 42:6, pages 407-427.
Crossref
Nigel Guenole, Anna A. Brown & Andrew J. Cooper. (2016) Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling. Assessment 25:4, pages 513-526.
Crossref
Matthias von Davier, Hyo-Jeong Shin, Lale Khorramdel & Lazar Stankov. (2017) The Effects of Vignette Scoring on Reliability and Validity of Self-Reports. Applied Psychological Measurement 42:4, pages 291-306.
Crossref
Matthias von Davier. (2018) Detecting and treating errors in tests and surveys. Quality Assurance in Education 26:2, pages 243-262.
Crossref
Roger Tourangeau. (2018) The survey response process from a cognitive viewpoint. Quality Assurance in Education 26:2, pages 169-181.
Crossref
Ulf Böckenholt & Thorsten Meiser. (2017) Response style analysis with threshold and multi‐process IRT models: A review and tutorial. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 70:1, pages 159-181.
Crossref
Hansjörg Plieninger. (2016) Mountain or Molehill? A Simulation Study on the Impact of Response Styles. Educational and Psychological Measurement 77:1, pages 32-53.
Crossref
Randy E. Bennett & Matthias von Davier. 2017. Advancing Human Assessment. Advancing Human Assessment 635 687 .
Hung-Yu Huang. (2016) Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
David Rollock & P. Priscilla Lui. (2016) Measurement Invariance and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Assessment 23:5, pages 571-587.
Crossref
Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger. (2016) Response Styles in Rating Scales. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 41:3, pages 239-268.
Crossref
Li CaiKilchan ChoiMark HansenLauren Harrell. (2016) Item Response Theory. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 3:1, pages 297-321.
Crossref
Yi Lu & Daniel M. Bolt. (2015) Examining the attitude-achievement paradox in PISA using a multilevel multidimensional IRT model for extreme response style. Large-scale Assessments in Education 3:1.
Crossref
Jörg Blasius & Victor Thiessen. (2015) Should we trust survey data? Assessing response simplification and data fabrication. Social Science Research 52, pages 479-493.
Crossref
Ferdinand Keller & Ingrid Koller. 2015. Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research. Dependent Data in Social Sciences Research 309 324 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.