https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3380-469X
Citations (24)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Serena Stefani & Gabriele Prati. (2024) Gender ideology and fertility: evidence for a curvilinear hypothesis. The Journal of Social Psychology 164:3, pages 280-292.
Read now
Read now
Monique Joyce, Zalia Powell & Cindy Davis. (2023) The impact of COVID-19 on fertility intention in Australian adults. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 33:7, pages 895-908.
Read now
Read now
Jac Thomas, Francisco Rowe & Eric S. Lin. (2023) Declining fertility in Taiwan: the deterring impact of housework imbalance. Asian Population Studies 19:3, pages 270-288.
Read now
Read now
Alina Pelikh, Hanna Remes, Niina Metsä-Simola & Alice Goisis. (2023) Partnership trajectories preceding medically assisted reproduction. Population Studies 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
Read now
Wioletta Grzenda. Short-term fertility intentions and outcomes: similarities and differences between childless women and mothers. Journal of Family Studies 0:0, pages 1-25.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (19)
Sichen Liu, Quanling Cai, Mingxing Wang & Kaisheng Di. (2024) Urban public services and fertility intentions of internal migrants in China. PLOS ONE 19:3, pages e0300345.
Crossref
Crossref
Eva-Maria Schmidt. (2024) Needing a child to be fulfilled? The relevance of social norms around childbearing desires in collective orientations and individual meanings. Journal of Family Research 36, pages 5-24.
Crossref
Crossref
Bernhard Riederer & Éva Beaujouan. (2023) Explaining the urban–rural gradient in later fertility in Europe. Population, Space and Place 30:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Ewa Jarosz, Anna Matysiak & Beata Osiewalska. (2023) Maternal Free Time: A Missing Element in Fertility Studies. Population and Development Review 49:4, pages 801-828.
Crossref
Crossref
Maxim Kan. (2023) Are gender attitudes and gender division of housework and childcare related to fertility intentions in Kazakhstan?. Genus 79:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Linus Andersson. (2023) A Novel Macro Perspective on Family Dynamics: The Contribution of Partnership Contexts of Births to Cohort Fertility Rates. Population and Development Review 49:3, pages 617-649.
Crossref
Crossref
Nishat Tasneem, Shah Md Atiqul Haq, Mufti Nadimul Quamar Ahmed & Khandaker Jafor Ahmed. (2023) Fertility decisions in the wake of COVID-19: a comprehensive review of influencing determinants and trends. SN Social Sciences 3:8.
Crossref
Crossref
Cihad Dundar & Tugce Kaya Elverdi. (2023) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the attitude towards childbearing of married aged 20–30 Turkish women who are not yet mothers: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 23:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Yuan Chen, Erhao Ge, Liqiong Zhou, Juan Du & Ruth Mace. (2023) Sex inequality driven by dispersal. Current Biology 33:3, pages 464-473.e4.
Crossref
Crossref
Begoña Elizalde-San Miguel, Vicente Díaz Gandasegui & María T. Sanz. (2023) Growing Pains: Can Family Policies Revert the Decline of Fertility in Spain?. Social Inclusion 11:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Wyndy Wurtenberger, Sequoia Solmorales & Kristin Snopkowski. 2023. Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior. Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior
1
13
.
Xiao Yu & Jianing Liang. (2022) Social norms and fertility intentions: Evidence from China. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Crossref
Mikaela Brough & Paula Sheppard. (2022) Fertility Decision-Making in the UK: Insights from a Qualitative Study among British Men and Women. Social Sciences 11:9, pages 409.
Crossref
Crossref
Jac Thomas, Francisco Rowe, Paul Williamson & Eric S. Lin. (2022) The effect of leave policies on increasing fertility: a systematic review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Youngcho Lee. (2022) Is Leave for Fathers Pronatalist? A Mixed-Methods Study of the Impact of Fathers’ Uptake of Parental Leave on Couples’ Childbearing Intentions in South Korea. Population Research and Policy Review 41:4, pages 1471-1500.
Crossref
Crossref
Dovilė Galdauskaitė. (2022) Links Between Fertility and Gender Revolution: Lithuania from a Comparative Perspective. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika 24, pages 69-83.
Crossref
Crossref
Alina Pelikh, Júlia Mikolai & Hill Kulu. (2022) Make up or break up? Partnership transitions among young adults in England and Wales. Advances in Life Course Research 52, pages 100475.
Crossref
Crossref
Paula Sheppard & Kristin Snopkowski. (2021) Behavioral Ecology of the Family: Harnessing Theory to Better Understand Variation in Human Families. Social Sciences 10:7, pages 275.
Crossref
Crossref
Alina Pelikh, Hanna Remes, Niina Metsä-Simola & Alice Goisis. (2022) Partnership Trajectories Preceding Medically Assisted Reproduction. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref