Citations (27)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Marion Davidson, Sherry Nakhaeizadeh & Carolyn Rando. (2023) Cognitive bias and the order of examination in forensic anthropological non-metric methods: a pilot study. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 55:2, pages 255-271.
Read now
Read now
Nathanael E. J. Sumampouw, Corine de Ruiter & Henry Otgaar. (2022) Potential for police investigator bias: the impact of child sexual abuse victims’ background characteristics on perceived statement credibility, case outcome and quality of interview questions. Police Practice and Research 23:3, pages 370-387.
Read now
Read now
Kristy A. Martire & Richard I. Kemp. (2018) Considerations when designing human performance tests in the forensic sciences. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 50:2, pages 166-182.
Read now
Read now
Rachel Dioso-Villa, Roberta Julian, Mark Kebbell, Lynne Weathered & Nina Westera. (2016) Investigation to Exoneration: A Systemic Review of Wrongful Conviction in Australia. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 28:2, pages 157-172.
Read now
Read now
Bryan Found. (2015) Deciphering the human condition: the rise of cognitive forensics. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 47:4, pages 386-401.
Read now
Read now
Jeff Kukucka. (2014) The Journey or the Destination? Disentangling Process and Outcome in Forensic Identification. Forensic Science Policy & Management: An International Journal 5:3-4, pages 112-114.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (21)
Poulomi Bhadra. 2023. Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus. Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus
243
257
.
Ning He, Ling Wang & Hongxia Hao. (2022) Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China. Forensic Science International 333, pages 111232.
Crossref
Crossref
Marie-Louise H. J. Loos, Wies M. Allema, Roel Bakx, Reinoud D. Stoel, Rick R. van Rijn & Wouter A. Karst. (2020) Paediatric femur fractures—the value of contextual information on judgement in possible child abuse cases: are we bias?. European Journal of Pediatrics 180:1, pages 81-90.
Crossref
Crossref
Poulomi Bhadra. 2021. Criminal Psychology and the Criminal Justice System in India and Beyond. Criminal Psychology and the Criminal Justice System in India and Beyond
215
227
.
Willem Bart de LintWillem Bart de Lint. 2021. Blurring Intelligence Crime. Blurring Intelligence Crime
21
48
.
Jeff Kukucka, Alexa Hiley & Saul M. Kassin. (2020) Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task‐Irrelevant Information?*†. Journal of Forensic Sciences 65:6, pages 1978-1990.
Crossref
Crossref
Helen Earwaker, Sherry Nakhaeizadeh, Nadine M. Smit & Ruth M. Morgan. (2020) A cultural change to enable improved decision-making in forensic science: A six phased approach. Science & Justice 60:1, pages 9-19.
Crossref
Crossref
Jeff Kukucka. (2020) People who live in ivory towers shouldn’t throw stones: A refutation of Curley et al.. Forensic Science International: Synergy 2, pages 110-113.
Crossref
Crossref
Sherry Nakhaeizadeh, Itiel E. Dror & Ruth M. Morgan. 2020. Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton. Sex Estimation of the Human Skeleton
327
342
.
Ruth M. Morgan, Georgina E. Meakin, James C. French & Sherry Nakhaeizadeh. (2019) Crime reconstruction and the role of trace materials from crime scene to court. WIREs Forensic Science 2:1.
Crossref
Crossref
William C. Thompson & Nicholas Scurich. (2019) How Cross‐Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences 64:5, pages 1379-1388.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew Camilleri, Damien Abarno, Carolyne Bird, Anne Coxon, Natasha Mitchell, Kahlee Redman, Nicol Sly, Stephen Wills, Edmund Silenieks, Ellie Simpson & Heather Lindsay. (2019) A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science. Science & Justice 59:5, pages 533-543.
Crossref
Crossref
Hilary J. Hamnett & Rachael E. Jack. (2019) The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences. Science & Justice 59:4, pages 380-389.
Crossref
Crossref
Nikola K.P. Osborne & Michael C. Taylor. (2018) Contextual information management: An example of independent-checking in the review of laboratory-based bloodstain pattern analysis. Science & Justice 58:3, pages 226-231.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2018. The Psychology and Sociology of Wrongful Convictions. The Psychology and Sociology of Wrongful Convictions
215
245
.
Steve D. Charman, Melissa Kavetski & Dana Hirn Mueller. (2017) Cognitive bias in the legal system: Police officers evaluate ambiguous evidence in a belief-consistent manner.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6:2, pages 193-202.
Crossref
Crossref
Nikola K. P. Osborne & Rachel Zajac. (2016) An Imperfect Match? Crime-related Context Influences Fingerprint Decisions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 30:1, pages 126-134.
Crossref
Crossref
Antonio Iudici, Alessandro Salvini, Elena Faccio & Gianluca Castelnuovo. (2015) The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew Sulner. 2009. Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science
1
15
.
Christophe Champod. (2014) Research focused mainly on bias will paralyse forensic science. Science & Justice 54:2, pages 107-109.
Crossref
Crossref
William C. Thompson & Nicholas Scurich. (2019) How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref