Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology Volume 1, 1979 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
8
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Editorial policy II

Byron P. Rourke University of Windsor
&
Louis Costa University of Victoria
Pages 93-95 | Published online: 04 Jan 2008

Citations (38)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (1)

HenryV. Soper, DomenicV. Cicchetti, Paul Satz, Roger Light & DonnaL. Orsini. (1988) Null Hypothesis Disrespect in Neuropsychology: Dangers of Alpha and Beta Errors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 10:2, pages 255-270.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (37)

Raymond Hubbard & J. Scott Armstrong. (1992) Are null results becoming an endangered species in marketing?. Marketing Letters 3:2, pages 127-136.
Crossref
Domenic V. Cicchetti. (2011) Reflections from the peer review mirror. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 167-186.
Crossref
Thomas R. Zentall. (2011) What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 166-167.
Crossref
Gerald S. Wasserman. (2011) Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 165-166.
Crossref
Peter Tyrer. (2011) Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 164-165.
Crossref
Lawrence J. Stricker. (2011) Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 163-164.
Crossref
Peter H. Schönemann. (2011) In praise of randomness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 162-163.
Crossref
Kurt Salzinger. (2011) Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 162-162.
Crossref
Byron P. Rourke. (2011) Toward openness and fairness in the review process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 161-161.
Crossref
Robert Rosenthal. (2011) Some indices of the reliability of peer review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 160-161.
Crossref
Henry L. RoedigerIIIIII. (2011) Is unreliability in peer review harmful?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 159-160.
Crossref
Linda D. Nelson. (2011) The process of peer review: Unanswered questions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 158-159.
Crossref
Herbert W. Marsh & Samuel Ball. (2011) Reflections on the peer review process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 157-158.
Crossref
Michael J. Mahoney. (2011) Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 157-157.
Crossref
Stephen P. Lock. (2011) Should the blinded lead the blinded?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 156-157.
Crossref
Donald Laming. (2011) Why is the reliability of peer review so low?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 154-156.
Crossref
Helena Chmura Kraemer. (2011) Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 152-154.
Crossref
Charles A. Kiesler. (2011) Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 151-152.
Crossref
Lowell L. Hargens. (2011) Referee agreement in context. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 150-151.
Crossref
Richard Greene. (2011) Is there an alternative to peer review?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 149-150.
Crossref
Michael E. Gorman. (2011) Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 149-149.
Crossref
J. Barnard Gilmore. (2011) On forecasting validity and finessing reliability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 148-149.
Crossref
Steve Fuller. (2011) Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 147-148.
Crossref
Jack M. Fletcher. (2011) Journal availability and the quality of published research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 146-147.
Crossref
Douglas Lee Eckberg. (2011) When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 145-146.
Crossref
Marilyn E. Demorest. (2011) Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 144-145.
Crossref
Fred Delcomyn. (2011) Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 144-144.
Crossref
Rick Crandall. (2011) What should be done improve reviewing?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 143-143.
Crossref
John D. Cone. (2011) Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 142-142.
Crossref
Andrew M. Colman. (2011) Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 141-142.
Crossref
Stephen Cole. (2011) Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 140-141.
Crossref
Patricia Cohen. (2011) Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 139-140.
Crossref
Robert F. Bornstein. (2011) The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 138-139.
Crossref
John C. Bailar. (2011) Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 137-138.
Crossref
J. Scott Armstrong & Raymond Hubbard. (2011) Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 136-137.
Crossref
Kenneth M. Adams. (2011) Peer review: An unflattering picture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 135-136.
Crossref
Domenic V. Cicchetti. (2011) The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:1, pages 119-135.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.