Advanced search
Publication Cover
Language and Cognitive Processes Volume 26, 2011 - Issue 4-6
Journal homepage
404
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Morphology in Language Comprehension, Production and Acquisition

On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries

Jay G. Rueckl Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT; Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USACorrespondence[email protected]
&
Anurag Rimzhim Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT; Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Pages 482-508 | Published online: 12 Aug 2010

Citations (29)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (8)

Mallory C. Stites, Kara D. Federmeier & Kiel Christianson. (2016) Do morphemes matter when reading compound words with transposed letters? Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:10, pages 1299-1319.
Read now
Elisabeth Beyersmann, Samantha F. McCormick & Kathleen Rastle. (2013) Letter transpositions within morphemes and across morpheme boundaries. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 66:12, pages 2389-2410.
Read now
Steven G. Luke & Kiel Christianson. (2013) The influence of frequency across the time course of morphological processing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25:7, pages 781-799.
Read now
Kevin Diependaele, Joanna Morris, RaphaelM. Serota, Daisy Bertrand & Jonathan Grainger. (2013) Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:7, pages 988-1003.
Read now
Marcus Taft & Christopher Nillsen. (2013) Morphological decomposition and the transposed-letter (TL) position effect. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:7, pages 917-938.
Read now
Sachiko Kinoshita, Dennis Norris & Noam Siegelman. (2012) Transposed-letter priming effect in Hebrew in the same–different task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65:7, pages 1296-1305.
Read now
KathleenM. Masserang & Alexander Pollatsek. (2012) Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications for morphological decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24:4, pages 476-495.
Read now
Raymond Bertram, Jukka Hyönä & Matti Laine. (2011) Morphology in language comprehension, production and acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 26:4-6, pages 457-481.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Lyulei Zhang & Adam.F. Osth. (2024) Modelling orthographic similarity effects in recognition memory reveals support for open bigram representations of letter coding. Cognitive Psychology 148, pages 101619.
Crossref
Alexander Taikh, Christina L. Gagné & Thomas L. Spalding. (2023) Influence of the constituent morpheme boundary on compound word access. Memory & Cognition.
Crossref
Fengjiao Cong & Baoguo Chen. (2021) The letter position coding mechanism of second language words during sentence reading: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 75:10, pages 1932-1947.
Crossref
Jeahong Kim, JeYoung Jung & Kichun Nam. (2021) Neural correlates of confusability in recognition of morphologically complex Korean words. PLOS ONE 16:4, pages e0249111.
Crossref
Hasibe Kahraman & Bilal Kırkıcı. (2021) Letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries in the second language processing of derived words: An exploratory study of individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:2, pages 417-446.
Crossref
Junjuan GU & Jinfu SHI. (2022) The cognitive mechanism of Chinese character position processing and word boundary effect. Advances in Psychological Science 29:2, pages 191-201.
Crossref
俊敏 李. (2020) Morphological Decomposition and TL Effect. Modern Linguistics 08:02, pages 192-198.
Crossref
Feryal Çubukçu. (2019) Assessment and final reports in foreign language lessons. EduLingua 5:1, pages 57-65.
Crossref
Manuel Carreiras, Blair C. Armstrong & Jon Andoni Duñabeitia. 2018. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience 1 38 .
Sarah J. Starling & Kelsey A. Snyder. (2018) Cna Uoy Raed Thsi Nwo? Contextual and Stimulus Effects on Decoding Scrambled Words. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research 23:3, pages 237-250.
Crossref
Madeleine Voga & Hélène Giraudo. (2017) Word and beyond-word issues in morphological processing. Word Structure 10:2, pages 235-255.
Crossref
Ehsan Shafiee Zargar & Naoko Witzel. (2016) Transposed-Letter Priming Across Inflectional Morpheme Boundaries. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:1, pages 125-140.
Crossref
Tal Norman, Tamar Degani & Orna Peleg. (2016) Morphological processing during visual word recognition in Hebrew as a first and a second language. Reading and Writing 30:1, pages 69-85.
Crossref
Hélène Giraudo & Serena Dal Maso. (2016) The Salience of Complex Words and Their Parts: Which Comes First?. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Joyse Medeiros & Jon Andoni Duñabeitia. (2016) Not Everybody Sees the Ness in the Darkness: Individual Differences in Masked Suffix Priming. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Junjuan Gu & Xingshan Li. (2014) The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:1, pages 272-281.
Crossref
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Manuel Perea & Manuel Carreiras. (2014) Revisiting letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21:6, pages 1557-1575.
Crossref
Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez & Kathleen Rastle. (2013) Letter transpositions within and across morphemic boundaries: Is there a cross-language difference?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20:5, pages 988-996.
Crossref
Marcus Taft & Lidija Krebs-Lazendic. (2013) The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 68:2, pages 85-97.
Crossref
Jukka Hyönä & Raymond Bertram. (2012) Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35:5, pages 290-291.
Crossref
Steven G. Luke & Kiel Christianson. (2011) Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect. Memory & Cognition 40:4, pages 628-641.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.