481
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Formal vs. Processing Approaches to Syntactic Phenomena

D-linking or set-restriction? Processing Which-questions in Dutch

, &
Pages 9-28 | Received 09 Feb 2010, Accepted 08 Feb 2011, Published online: 25 Oct 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

Masaya Yoshida, Nina Kazanina, Leticia Pablos & Patrick Sturt. (2014) On the origin of islands. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:7, pages 761-770.
Read now
Helen Goodluck & Eytan Zweig. (2013) Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:1-2, pages 1-8.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (9)

Myung Hye Yoo & Rebecca Tollan. (2023) Transitivity and non-uniform subjecthood in agreement attraction. Memory & Cognition 52:3, pages 536-553.
Crossref
Efrat Harel, Sharon Armon-Lotem & Irena Botwinik. (2023) Comprehension of who - and which -questions in monolingual and bilingual acquisition: Explicating the difficulty of set restriction . International Journal of Bilingualism.
Crossref
Yingtong LiuElodie Winckel, Anne Abeillé, Barbara Hemforth & Edward Gibson. (2022) Structural, Functional, and Processing Perspectives on Linguistic Island Effects. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1, pages 495-525.
Crossref
Maud Beljon, Dennis Joosen, Olaf Koeneman, Bram Ploum, Noëlle Sommer, Peter de Swart & Veerle Wilms. (2021) The effect of filler complexity and context on the acceptability of wh -island violations in Dutch . Linguistics in the Netherlands 38, pages 4-20.
Crossref
Anamaria Bentea & Theodoros Marinis. (2021) Not all wh-dependencies are created equal: processing of multiple wh-questions in Romanian children and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:4, pages 825-864.
Crossref
Rebecca Tollan, Diane Massam & Daphna Heller. (2019) Effects of Case and Transitivity on Processing Dependencies: Evidence From Niuean. Cognitive Science 43:6.
Crossref
Leticia Pablos, Jenny Doetjes & Lisa L.-S. Cheng. (2018) Backward Dependencies and in-Situ wh-Questions as Test Cases on How to Approach Experimental Linguistics Research That Pursues Theoretical Linguistics Questions. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Crossref
ANAMARIA BENTEA & STEPHANIE DURRLEMAN. (2017) Not committing has its advantages: facilitating children's comprehension of object filler–gap dependencies is one of them. Journal of Child Language 45:1, pages 35-71.
Crossref
Shannon M. Sheppard, Matthew Walenski, Tracy Love & Lewis P. Shapiro. (2015) The Auditory Comprehension of Wh -Questions in Aphasia: Support for the Intervener Hypothesis . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58:3, pages 781-797.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.