Citations: Sex/gender‐based decision‐making in the criminal justice system as a possible (additional) explanation for the underrepresentation of women in official criminal statistics

721

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Citations (8)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

Victoria Jackson, Danny H. Sullivan, Daveena Mawren, Arie Freiberg, Jayashri Kulkarni & Rajan Darjee. (2021) Trauma-informed sentencing of serious violent offenders: an exploration of judicial dispositions with a gendered perspective. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 28:5, pages 748-773.
Read now

Isabella K. Damiris, Nadine McKillop, Larissa S. Christensen, Susan Rayment-McHugh, Kelley Burton & Tess Patterson. (2021) Gendered judicial discourse in the sentencing of sexual offenders: a new explanatory model. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 33:2, pages 228-246.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (6)

Corinna Burgstedt, Amy Beeby, Harlene Hayne, Linda Hobbs, Julien Gross & Tess Patterson. (2022) Does Gender Affect Judges’ Perceptions of Sexual Assault Cases?. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38:1-2, pages 466-508.
Crossref

Laurie Giddens, Laura C. Amo & Dianna Cichocki. (2020) Gender bias and the impact on managerial evaluation of insider security threats. Computers & Security 99, pages 102066.
Crossref

Ricardo Gallego Córcoles & Raquel Bartolomé Gutiérrez. (2020) El efecto del género en la toma de decisiones en el sistema de Justicia Juvenil (The effect of gender on decision-making in the Juvenile Justice System). Oñati Socio-legal Series 10:2, pages 442-464.
Crossref

Timothy Kang. (2019) The Transition to Adulthood of Contemporary Delinquent Adolescents. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology 5:2, pages 176-202.
Crossref

Siyu Liu. (2014) Is the Shape of the Age-Crime Curve Invariant by Sex? Evidence from a National Sample with Flexible Non-parametric Modeling. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 31:1, pages 93-123.
Crossref

Lisa Stolzenberg & Stewart J. D'Alessio. (2004) Sex differences in the likelihood of arrest. Journal of Criminal Justice 32:5, pages 443-454.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Sex/gender‐based decision‐making in the criminal justice system as a possible (additional) explanation for the underrepresentation of women in official criminal statistics — a review of international literature

Articles from other publishers (6)

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Sex/gender‐based decision‐making in the criminal justice system as a possible (additional) explanation for the underrepresentation of women in official criminal statistics — a review of international literature

Citations (8)

Read on this site (2)

Articles from other publishers (6)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date