Nilay Muslu & Marcelle A. Siegel. (2024) Feedback Through Digital Application Affordances and Teacher Practice. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Crossref
Celine Shuen Yin Yoong, Doreen Shu Lin Goh, Yu Cong Wong, Cowan Ho, Elijah Zhengyang Cai, Angela Hing, Shen Liang, Yan Lin Yap, Jane Lim & Thiam Chye Lim. (2024) The Use of E-Learning in Peyton’s 4-Step Approach: Evaluation of Facial Computed Tomography Scans. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 35:3, pages 827-830.
Crossref
Lutfieh M. Rabbani & Salwa Habib Husain. (2024) Fostering student engagement with criticism feedback: importance, contrasting perspectives and key provisions. Frontiers in Education 9.
Crossref
Ya He, Olumide Olumayegun & Mohammad Zandi. (2024) Investigating chemical engineering students’ perceptions of feedback: A glimpse into current problems and a platform for improvement. Education for Chemical Engineers 46, pages 54-61.
Crossref
Hok-Yin Jeff Lau. 2024. Engaged Learning and Innovative Teaching in Higher Education. Engaged Learning and Innovative Teaching in Higher Education
263
283
.
Jonas T. Jørgensen, Bente Gammelgaard & Frederik V. Christiansen. (2023) Teacher Intentions vs Student Perception of Feedback on Laboratory Reports. Journal of Chemical Education 100:10, pages 3764-3773.
Crossref
Omid Noroozi, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Harm J. A. Biemans, Mattijs Smits, Mariëtte T.W. Vervoort & Caro-Lynn Verbaan. (2023) Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online supported peer feedback module to enhance students’ argumentative essay quality. Education and Information Technologies 28:10, pages 12757-12784.
Crossref
Nienke Renting, Debbie Jaarsma, Jan CC Borleffs, Joris P J Slaets, Janke Cohen-Schotanus & Rob O B Gans. (2023) Effectiveness of a supervisor training on quality of feedback to internal medicine residents: a controlled longitudinal multicentre study. BMJ Open 13:9, pages e076946.
Crossref
Jesmine S. H. Tan, Wenli Chen, Junzhu Su & Guo Su. (2023) The mechanism and effect of class-wide peer feedback on conceptual knowledge improvement: Does different feedback type matter?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 18:3, pages 393-424.
Crossref
Tao Wu, Maiga Chang & Xiaofen Ye. 2023. Handbook of Research on Advancing Equity and Inclusion Through Educational Technology. Handbook of Research on Advancing Equity and Inclusion Through Educational Technology
26
51
.
Zeinab Azizi & Sayed M. Ismail. (2023) What ethical requirements should be considered in language classroom assessment? insights from high school students. Language Testing in Asia 13:1.
Crossref
Amirhossein Rasooli, Abdollah Rasegh, Hamed Zandi & Tahereh Firoozi. (2022) Teachers’ Conceptions of Fairness in Classroom Assessment: An Empirical Study. Journal of Teacher Education 74:3, pages 260-273.
Crossref
Ivan Gratchev. (2023) Replacing Exams with Project-Based Assessment: Analysis of Students’ Performance and Experience. Education Sciences 13:4, pages 408.
Crossref
Chloé Desjardins, Lyne Pitre, David Adjo, Jean Henri Sagne, Salomon Fotsing, Éric Dionne, Edward Seale, Marjorie Pomerleau, Marissa Philippe, Georges Gharib & Manon Denis-LeBlanc. (2023) Évaluation d’un outil pour améliorer la qualité de la rétroaction écrite des précepteurs pour les résidents en médecine familiale : formations et utilisation d’un guide critérié basé sur les compétences CanMEDS-MF. Canadian Medical Education Journal.
Crossref
Ali Darabi Bazvand. (2023) Exploring student teachers’ perceptions of assessment ethics across university-based teacher education programs in Iran. Language Testing in Asia 13:1.
Crossref
María Luz Morales-Botello & Carlos Moreno Martínez. (2022) Semi-guided learning tool as framework for STEM students learning: A case study for final year projects. Education and Information Technologies 28:2, pages 1535-1557.
Crossref
Angèle Picco, Arjan Stuiver, Joost de Winter & Dick de Waard. (2023) The use of monitoring and feedback devices in driving: An assessment of acceptability and its key determinants. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 92, pages 1-14.
Crossref
Mayara Simões de Oliveira Castro, Rafael Ferreira Mello, Giuseppe Fiorentino, Olga Viberg, Daniel Spikol, Martine Baars & Dragan Gašević. 2023. Responsive and Sustainable Educational Futures. Responsive and Sustainable Educational Futures
399
414
.
Amy Hankins & Christine Harrington. (2022) Lack of High-Quality, Frequent Feedback Contributes to Low Success Rates for Community College Students. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice 7:4, pages 2-7.
Crossref
Molk ChakrounVincent R. DionKathleen OuelletAnn GraillonValérie DésiletsMarianne XhignesseChristina St-Onge. (2022) Narrative Assessments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review to Identify Evidence-Based Quality Indicators. Academic Medicine 97:11, pages 1699-1706.
Crossref
Elif Polat, Sinan Hopcan, Ebru Albayrak & Hatice Yildiz Durak. (2022) Examining the effect of feedback type and gender on computing achievements, engagement, flipped learning readiness, and autonomous learning in online flipped classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 30:6, pages 1641-1655.
Crossref
Hui Yong Tay & Karen W L Lam. (2022) Students’ engagement across a typology of teacher feedback practices. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 21:3, pages 427-445.
Crossref
Parina Yamjal & Ahmed AL-Sa’di. (2022) STRATEGIES FOR RETENTION AND COMPLETION IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: FACULTY PERSPECTIVES. Journal of Management and Business Education 5:4, pages 247-265.
Crossref
Ushba Rasool, Muhammad Zammad Aslam, Jiancheng Qian & Sami Hussein Hakeem Barzani. (2022) The Effects of Online Supervisory Feedback on Student-Supervisor Communications during the COVID-19. European Journal of Educational Research volume-11-2022:volume-11-issue-3-july-2022, pages 1569-1579.
Crossref
Suliman M. N. Alnasser. (2022) EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Integrating Computer-Based Feedback into Writing Classrooms: Evidence From Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open 12:3, pages 215824402211230.
Crossref
Cavit ERDOĞMUŞ & Özgen KORKMAZ. (2022) TRENDS IN EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES ACCORDING TO ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS IN INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE. International Online Journal of Primary Education 11:1, pages 232-259.
Crossref
Mohammad I. Merhi & Alex Meisami. (2021) Learners’ satisfaction with web‐based assessment platforms. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 20:2, pages 76-88.
Crossref
Heidi A. Diefes‐Dux & Laura M. Cruz Castro. (2022) Reflection types and students' viewing of feedback in a first‐year engineering course using standards‐based grading. Journal of Engineering Education 111:2, pages 283-307.
Crossref
Ali Darabi Bazvand & Amirhossein Rasooli. (2022) Students’ experiences of fairness in summative assessment: A study in a higher education context. Studies in Educational Evaluation 72, pages 101118.
Crossref
Sello Editor Moyo, Celeste Combrinck & Surette Van Staden. (2022) Evaluating the Impact of Formative Assessment Intervention and Experiences of the Standard 4 Teachers in Teaching Higher-Order-Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Wei Dai, Yi-Shan Tsai, Yizhou Fan, Dragan Gašević & Guanliang Chen. 2022. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Artificial Intelligence in Education
560
566
.
Pāvels Jurs & Elita Špehte. (2021) The Role of Feedback in the Distance Learning Process. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 23:2, pages 91-105.
Crossref
Afsheen Rezai, Gudarz Alibakhshi, Sajjad Farokhipour & Mowla Miri. (2021) A phenomenographic study on language assessment literacy: hearing from Iranian university teachers. Language Testing in Asia 11:1.
Crossref
Kim Dirkx, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke, Jorik Arts & Migchiel van Diggelen. (2019) In-text and rubric-referenced feedback: Differences in focus, level, and function. Active Learning in Higher Education 22:3, pages 189-201.
Crossref
Mercedes Vázquez-Vílchez, Dalia Garrido-Rosales, Beatriz Pérez-Fernández & Alicia Fernández-Oliveras. (2021) Using a Cooperative Educational Game to Promote Pro-Environmental Engagement in Future Teachers. Education Sciences 11:11, pages 691.
Crossref
Viktoria M. Carr, Andrea P. Francis & Mareike B. Wieth. (2021) The Relationship Between Helicopter Parenting and Fear of Negative Evaluation in College Students. Journal of Child and Family Studies 30:8, pages 1910-1919.
Crossref
Xiaoming Molly Wu, Helen R. Dixon & Lawrence Jun Zhang. (2021) Sustainable Development of Students’ Learning Capabilities: The Case of University Students’ Attitudes towards Teachers, Peers, and Themselves as Oral Feedback Sources in Learning English. Sustainability 13:9, pages 5211.
Crossref
Jan-Willem Strijbos, Ron Pat-El & Susanne Narciss. (2021) Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire. Studies in Educational Evaluation 68, pages 100980.
Crossref
Amin Marei, Susan A. Yoon, Jae-Un Yoo, Thomas Richman, Noora Noushad, Katherine Miller & Jooeun Shim. (2021) Designing Feedback Systems: Examining a Feedback Approach to Facilitation in an Online Asynchronous Professional Development Course for High School Science Teachers. Systems 9:1, pages 10.
Crossref
Tracy Griffin Spies. 2021. Handbook of Research on Developing Students’ Scholarly Dispositions in Higher Education. Handbook of Research on Developing Students’ Scholarly Dispositions in Higher Education
169
191
.
Marukh Shakir, Mujahid Shah & Munir Khattak. (2020) International ESL Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Effective and Constructive Feedback Practises on their Academic Writing in MA Programme.. Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies 6:4, pages 1401-1413.
Crossref
Florence Kyaruzi, Jan-Willem Strijbos & Stefan Ufer. (2020) Impact of a Short-Term Professional Development Teacher Training on Students’ Perceptions and Use of Errors in Mathematics Learning. Frontiers in Education 5.
Crossref
Bianca A. Simonsmeier, Henrike Peiffer, Maja Flaig & Michael Schneider. (2020) Peer Feedback Improves Students’ Academic Self-Concept in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education 61:6, pages 706-724.
Crossref
Susanne Voelkel, Tunde Varga‐Atkins & Luciane V. Mello. (2020) Students tell us what good written feedback looks like. FEBS Open Bio 10:5, pages 692-706.
Crossref
Kathryn Haughney, Shawnee Wakeman & Laura Hart. (2020) Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature. Education Sciences 10:3, pages 60.
Crossref
Philipp Sonnleitner & Carrie Kovacs. (2020) Differences Between Students’ and Teachers’ Fairness Perceptions: Exploring the Potential of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Improve Teachers’ Assessment Practices. Frontiers in Education 5.
Crossref
Catherine Paterson, Nathan Paterson, William Jackson & Fiona Work. (2020) What are students' needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today 85, pages 104236.
Crossref
Josh McCarthy. 2020. Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment Practices in Higher Education. Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment Practices in Higher Education
177
192
.
N. P. Subheesh & Satya Sundar Sethy. (2020) Learning through Assessment and Feedback Practices: A Critical Review of Engineering Education Settings. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16:3.
Crossref
Paul J. Mensink & Karen King. (2019) Student access of online feedback is modified by the availability of assessment marks, gender and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Technology 51:1, pages 10-22.
Crossref
Yong Wu & Christian D. Schunn. (2020) From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 60, pages 101826.
Crossref
Tak-Lam Wong, Chung Keung Poon, Chung Man Tang, Yuen Tak Yu & Victor Chung Sing Lee. 2020. Technology in Education. Innovations for Online Teaching and Learning. Technology in Education. Innovations for Online Teaching and Learning
126
135
.
Kalpana Goel. 2020. Social Work Education, Research and Practice. Social Work Education, Research and Practice
31
42
.
Yasmin J. Antwertinger, Ingrid Larkin, Esther T. L. Lau, Erin L. O’Connor & Jose Manuel Serrano Santos. 2020. Enriching Higher Education Students' Learning through Post-work Placement Interventions. Enriching Higher Education Students' Learning through Post-work Placement Interventions
47
67
.
Dolors Cañabate, Lluís Nogué, Teresa Serra & Jordi Colomer. (2019) Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions. Education Sciences 9:4, pages 280.
Crossref
Emma C. Burns, Andrew J. Martin & Rebecca J. Collie. (2019) Examining the yields of growth feedback from science teachers and students' intrinsic valuing of science: Implications for student‐ and school‐level science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56:8, pages 1060-1082.
Crossref
Amirhossein Rasooli, Christopher DeLuca, Abdollah Rasegh & Sajad Fathi. (2019) Students’ critical incidents of fairness in classroom assessment: an empirical study. Social Psychology of Education 22:3, pages 701-722.
Crossref
Tracii Ryan, Michael Henderson & Michael Phillips. (2019) Feedback modes matter: Comparing student perceptions of digital and non‐digital feedback modes in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 50:3, pages 1507-1523.
Crossref
Tim Moore, Glenda Ballantyne & Craig McIntosh. (2018) The embedding challenge. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 41:2, pages 130-156.
Crossref
Lubna Ghazal, Amina Aijaz, Yasmin Parpio, Ambreen Tharani & Raisa Begum Gul. (2018) Feed-forward: Paving ways for students' subsequent learning. Nurse Education Today 71, pages 116-120.
Crossref
Nadia Ali, Lubna Ahmed & Sarah Rose. (2017) Identifying predictors of students’ perception of and engagement with assessment feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 19:3, pages 239-251.
Crossref
Gavin T. L. Brown & Lois R. Harris. 2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback
97
120
.
Garry Laverty, Luc Belaid, Cathy Coulter & Simon Porter. (2018) Development of a teaching model to advance skills in industrial pharmaceutical formulation and regulatory aspects. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 10:10, pages 1419-1428.
Crossref
Tamar Tas, Thoni Houtveen, Wim van de Grift & Melissa Willemsen. (2018) Learning to teach: Effects of classroom observation, assignment of appropriate lesson preparation templates and stage focused feedback. Studies in Educational Evaluation 58, pages 8-16.
Crossref
Sevil ASLAN & Ömer Lütfi ANTALYALI. (2018) GÜÇ MOTİVASYONUNUN İŞ SEVGİSİNE ETKİSİNDE GERİBİLDİRİM ARAMA DAVRANIŞININ DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜTHE MODERATOR ROLE OF FEEDBACK SEEKING BEHAVIOUR ON THE INFLUENCE OF POWER MOTIVATION ON LIKING OF WORK. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 9:21, pages 102-113.
Crossref
Kay Emblen-Perry. (2018) Enhancing student engagement in business sustainability through games. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 19:5, pages 858-876.
Crossref
Charlotte Chalmers, Elaine Mowat & Maggie Chapman. (2017) Marking and providing feedback face-to-face: Staff and student perspectives. Active Learning in Higher Education 19:1, pages 35-45.
Crossref
Amirhossein Rasooli, Hamed Zandi & Christopher DeLuca. (2018) Re-conceptualizing classroom assessment fairness: A systematic meta-ethnography of assessment literature and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation 56, pages 164-181.
Crossref
Martijn J. M. Leenknecht & Frans J. Prins. (2017) Formative peer assessment in primary school: the effects of involving pupils in setting assessment criteria on their appraisal and feedback style. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1, pages 101-116.
Crossref
Kay Emblen-Perry. 2018. Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research. Handbook of Sustainability Science and Research
849
866
.
Matthew D. Pistilli & Gregory L. Heileman. (2017) Guiding Early and Often: Using Curricular and Learning Analytics to Shape Teaching, Learning, and Student Success in Gateway Courses. New Directions for Higher Education 2017:180, pages 21-30.
Crossref
Matthew D. Pistilli. (2017) Learner Analytics and Student Success Interventions. New Directions for Higher Education 2017:179, pages 43-52.
Crossref
Earl Simendinger, Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar, Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez, John Crawford, Stephanie Thomason, Philippe Reynet, Björn Kjellander & Judson Edwards. (2017) Teaching effectiveness attributes in business schools. International Journal of Educational Management 31:6, pages 780-800.
Crossref
Roland Burger. (2016) Student perceptions of the fairness of grading procedures: a multilevel investigation of the role of the academic environment. Higher Education 74:2, pages 301-320.
Crossref
helen williams & nicola smith. (2017) feedback: critiquing practice, moving forward. European Political Science 16:2, pages 159-178.
Crossref
Shinyoung Kim, Sunmee Choi & Rohit Verma. (2017) Providing feedback to service customers. Journal of Service Management 28:2, pages 389-416.
Crossref
Omid Noroozi & Martin Mulder. (2016) Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 45:1, pages 31-39.
Crossref
Alain Simons, Karsten Pedersen, Jose Fonseca & Simant Prakoonwit. 2017. E-Learning and Games. E-Learning and Games
251
261
.
Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder. (2016) Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education 31, pages 20-31.
Crossref
Diana Pereira, Maria Assunção Flores, Ana Margarida Veiga Simão & Alexandra Barros. (2016) Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: A study of undergraduate students. Studies in Educational Evaluation 49, pages 7-14.
Crossref
Sharon Zumbrunn, Sarah Marrs & Caitlin Mewborn. (2015) Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: a mixed methods study. Reading and Writing 29:2, pages 349-370.
Crossref
Jane Costello & Daph Crane. 2016. Handbook of Research on Active Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model in the Digital Age. Handbook of Research on Active Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model in the Digital Age
212
231
.
MARRS SARAH, ZUMBRUNN SHARON, McBRIDE CAITLIN & STRINGER JK. (2016) EXPLORING ELEMENTARY STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF WRITING FEEDBACK. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology 10:1, pages 16.
Crossref
Ruth Strudwick & Jane Day. (2015) Developing effective assignment feedback for an interprofessional learning module—An action research project. Nurse Education Today 35:9, pages 974-980.
Crossref
Jered Borup, Richard E. West & Rebecca Thomas. (2015) The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development 63:2, pages 161-184.
Crossref
Peeter Kukk & Sanna Heikkinen. (2015) Assignments, assessment and feedback in Engineering Graphics courses. Assignments, assessment and feedback in Engineering Graphics courses.
Frederique Bouilheres. 2015. Redefining Asia Pacific Higher Education in Contexts of Globalization: Private Markets and the Public Good. Redefining Asia Pacific Higher Education in Contexts of Globalization: Private Markets and the Public Good
101
116
.
Natalie M. Agius & Ann Wilkinson. (2014) Students' and teachers' views of written feedback at undergraduate level: A literature review. Nurse Education Today 34:4, pages 552-559.
Crossref
Harm Tillema. 2014. Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. Designing Assessment for Quality Learning
39
53
.
Colleen Halupa & Doris U. Bolliger. (2013) Student Perceptions on the Utilization of Formative Feedback in the Online Environment. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 3:2, pages 59-76.
Crossref
Carol Evans. (2013) Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research 83:1, pages 70-120.
Crossref
Diana Ribeiro Pereira & Maria Assunção Flores. (2013) Avaliação e feedback no ensino superior: um estudo na Universidade do Minho. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior.
Crossref
Katerina Bohle Carbonell, Amber Dailey-Hebert, Maike Gerken & Therese Grohnert. 2013. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention in e-learning Environments: Web 2.0 and Blended Learning Technologies. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention in e-learning Environments: Web 2.0 and Blended Learning Technologies
359
386
.
Hendrien Duijnhouwer, Frans J. Prins & Karel M. Stokking. (2012) Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction 22:3, pages 171-184.
Crossref
Sally Jordan. (2012) Student engagement with assessment and feedback: Some lessons from short-answer free-text e-assessment questions. Computers & Education 58:2, pages 818-834.
Crossref
Anne Crook, Alice Mauchline, Stephen Maw, Clare Lawson, Robyn Drinkwater, Karsten Lundqvist, Paul Orsmond, Stephen Gomez & Julian Park. (2012) The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students?. Computers & Education 58:1, pages 386-396.
Crossref
Cris Yelland. (2011) A genre and move analysis of written feedback in higher education. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 20:3, pages 218-235.
Crossref
Anna Rowe. (2011) The personal dimension in teaching: why students value feedback. International Journal of Educational Management 25:4, pages 343-360.
Crossref
Harm Tillema, Martijn Leenknecht & Mien Segers. (2011) Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning – A review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37:1, pages 25-34.
Crossref
Ingrid Nix & Ali Wyllie. (2011) Exploring design features to enhance computer-based assessment: Learners' views on using a confidence-indicator tool and computer-based feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 42:1, pages 101-112.
Crossref
Harm Tillema. 2011. Handboek human resource development. Handboek human resource development
443
458
.
Yavuz Taneli & Selay Yurtkuran Tok. (2010) An alternative assessment scale for student work produced in the architectural studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2:2, pages 2024-2028.
Crossref
Siobhan Hugh-Jones, Mitch Waterman & Inga Wilson. (2009) Accessing and Understanding the Tacit Dimensions of Assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching 8:2, pages 7-15.
Crossref
Elaine Ball, Helen Franks, Jane Jenkins, Maureen McGrath & Jackie Leigh. (2009) Annotation is a valuable tool to enhance learning and assessment in student essays. Nurse Education Today 29:3, pages 284-291.
Crossref