Advanced search
Publication Cover
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 45, 2020 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,561
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis

Lanqin ZhengFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Xuan ZhangFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
&
Panpan CuiFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, ChinaView further author information
Pages 372-386 | Published online: 31 Jul 2019

Citations (42)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (7)

Fu-Yun Yu & Ju-Ko Wei. (2024) Citing as an online learning support tool for student-generated assessment. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 33:2, pages 165-186.
Read now
Chunping Zheng, Lili Wang & Ching Sing Chai. (2023) Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:4, pages 806-839.
Read now
Keith James Topping. (2023) Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education 38:3, pages 472-498.
Read now
Ting-Chia Hsu, Wen-Li Chen & Gwo-Jen Hwang. (2023) Impacts of interactions between peer assessment and learning styles on students’ mobile learning achievements and motivations in vocational design certification courses. Interactive Learning Environments 31:3, pages 1351-1363.
Read now
Rabeya Khatoon & Elinor Jones. (2022) Flipped small group classes and peer marking: incentives, student participation and performance in a quasi-experimental approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:6, pages 910-927.
Read now
Juan Ramón Rico-Juan, Cristina Cachero & Hermenegilda Macià. (2022) Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:4, pages 570-587.
Read now
Brian A. Vander Schee & Tim Dugan Birrittella. (2021) Hybrid and Online Peer Group Grading: Adding Assessment Efficiency While Maintaining Perceived Fairness. Marketing Education Review 31:4, pages 275-283.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (35)

Yi Zhang, Christian D. Schunn & Yong Wu. (2024) What does it mean to be good at peer reviewing? A multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis study of behavioral indicators of peer feedback literacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 21:1.
Crossref
Rafi Safadi & Nadera Hawa. (2023) Learning from erroneous examples in the mathematics classroom: do students with different naïve ideas benefit equally?. Instructional Science 52:2, pages 277-308.
Crossref
Brian A. Vander Schee, Tony Stovall & Demetra Andrews. (2022) Using cross-course peer grading with content expertise, anonymity, and perceived justice. Active Learning in Higher Education 25:1, pages 101-114.
Crossref
Tomás Alves, Francisco Sousa, Sandra Gama, Joaquim Jorge & Daniel Gonçalves. (2023) How Personality Traits Affect Peer Assessment in Distance Learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 29:1, pages 371-396.
Crossref
Yao Xiong, Christian D. Schunn & Yong Wu. (2023) What predicts variation in reliability and validity of online peer assessment? A large‐scale cross‐context study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39:6, pages 2004-2024.
Crossref
Rialy Andriamiseza, Franck Silvestre, Jean-François Parmentier & Julien Broisin. (2023) How Learning Analytics Can Help Orchestration of Formative Assessment? Data-Driven Recommendations for Technology- Enhanced Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 16:5, pages 804-819.
Crossref
Fu-Yun Yu, Yu-Hsin Liu & Kristine Liu. (2023) Online peer-assessment quality control: A proactive measure, validation study, and sensitivity analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation 78, pages 101279.
Crossref
Ying Zhan, Zi Yan, Zhi Hong Wan, Xiang Wang, Ye Zeng, Min Yang & Lan Yang. (2023) Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology 54:4, pages 817-835.
Crossref
Yi Zhang & Christian D. Schunn. (2023) Self-regulation of peer feedback quality aspects through different dimensions of experience within prior peer feedback assignments. Contemporary Educational Psychology 74, pages 102210.
Crossref
Hung-Ling Chen & Chia-Yu Liu. (2023) The Effects of Web-Based Peer Assessment and Peer Feedback Quality on Students’ Performances in a Financial Market Course. TechTrends 67:4, pages 664-675.
Crossref
Gbetonmasse Somasse & Melissa Wrobel. (2023) Work in Progress: KLIQED, A Feedback Tool for Fostering Peer Engagement during Student Oral Presentations. Work in Progress: KLIQED, A Feedback Tool for Fostering Peer Engagement during Student Oral Presentations.
Mirella V. Jongsma, Danny J. Scholten, Jacqueline E. van Muijlwijk-Koezen & Martijn Meeter. (2022) Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 61:2, pages 329-354.
Crossref
Frederick C. Berry, Wanju Huang & Marisa Exter. (2023) Improving Accuracy of Self-and-Peer Assessment in Engineering Technology Capstone. IEEE Transactions on Education 66:2, pages 174-187.
Crossref
Keith James Topping. (2023) Advantages and Disadvantages of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Learning in Higher Education: A Review. Education Sciences 13:4, pages 326.
Crossref
Cristina Cachero, Juan Ramón Rico-Juan & Hermenegilda Macià. (2023) Influence of personality and modality on peer assessment evaluation perceptions using Machine Learning techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 213, pages 119150.
Crossref
Paula Loureiro & Maria João Gomes. (2023) Online Peer Assessment for Learning: Findings from Higher Education Students. Education Sciences 13:3, pages 253.
Crossref
Keith J. Topping. 2023. International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) 79 88 .
Kumaran RajaramKumaran Rajaram. 2023. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies 217 302 .
José Carlos G. Ocampo & Ernesto Panadero. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning 165 182 .
Zi Yan, Hongling Lao, Ernesto Panadero, Belen Fernández-Castilla, Lan Yang & Min Yang. (2022) Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 37, pages 100484.
Crossref
Ecenaz Alemdag & Zahide Yildirim. (2022) Effectiveness of online regulation scaffolds on peer feedback provision and uptake: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education 188, pages 104574.
Crossref
Ecenaz Alemdag & Zahide Yildirim. (2022) Design and development of an online formative peer assessment environment with instructional scaffolds. Educational technology research and development 70:4, pages 1359-1389.
Crossref
Kalie Chamberlain. 2022. Handbook of Research on Writing Instruction Practices for Equitable and Effective Teaching. Handbook of Research on Writing Instruction Practices for Equitable and Effective Teaching 104 121 .
Natasha Dmoshinskaia, Hannie Gijlers & Ton de Jong. (2021) Does Learning from Giving Feedback Depend on the Product Being Reviewed: Concept Maps or Answers to Test Questions?. Journal of Science Education and Technology 31:2, pages 166-176.
Crossref
Loc Phuoc Hoang, Hieu Thanh Le, Hung Van Tran, Thanh Chi Phan, Duc Minh Vo, Phuong Anh Le, Dung The Nguyen & Chakrit Pong-inwong. (2021) Does evaluating peer assessment accuracy and taking it into account in calculating assessor’s final score enhance online peer assessment quality?. Education and Information Technologies 27:3, pages 4007-4035.
Crossref
Melanie W. Pound, Dawn W. Carroll & Ann Marie Nye. (2022) Peer review of presentations through examination software. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 14:2, pages 240-244.
Crossref
Zheng Zong, Christian D. Schunn & Yanqing Wang. (2022) Do experiences of interactional inequality predict lower depth of future student participation in peer review?. Computers in Human Behavior 127, pages 107056.
Crossref
Ying Cui, Christian D. Schunn, Xiaosong Gai, Ying Jiang & Zhe Wang. (2021) Effects of Trained Peer vs. Teacher Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Internalization of Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Zheng Zong, Christian D. Schunn & Yanqing Wang. (2021) What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students’ task performance?. Computers in Human Behavior 124, pages 106924.
Crossref
Keith James Topping. (2021) Digital Hardware for Peer Assessment in K-12 Schools and Universities. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
Yong Wu & Christian D. Schunn. (2021) From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation. Instructional Science 49:3, pages 365-394.
Crossref
Jingchun Chen. (2021) The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Blended Learning Environments. The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Blended Learning Environments.
Natasha Dmoshinskaia, Hannie Gijlers & Ton de Jong. (2021) Learning from reviewing peers’ concept maps in an inquiry context: Commenting or grading, which is better?. Studies in Educational Evaluation 68, pages 100959.
Crossref
Keith Topping. (2021) Peer Assessment: Channels of Operation. Education Sciences 11:3, pages 91.
Crossref
Lanqin ZhengLanqin Zheng. 2021. Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 117 131 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.