733
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Alternative Conceptions of Chemical Bonding Held by Upper Secondary and Tertiary Students

Pages 171-191 | Published online: 25 Aug 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (6)

Burcin Acar Sesen & Leman Tarhan. (2011) Active-learning versus teacher-centered instruction for learning acids and bases. Research in Science & Technological Education 29:2, pages 205-226.
Read now
RichardK. Coll & Chris Eames. (2008) Developing an understanding of higher education science and engineering learning communities. Research in Science & Technological Education 26:3, pages 245-257.
Read now
Jazilah Othman, DavidF. Treagust & A. L. Chandrasegaran. (2008) An Investigation into the Relationship between Students’ Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter and their Understanding of Chemical Bonding. International Journal of Science Education 30:11, pages 1531-1550.
Read now
Jiun‐Liang Ke, Martin Monk & Richard Duschl. (2005) Learning Introductory Quantum Physics: Sensori‐motor experiences and mental models. International Journal of Science Education 27:13, pages 1571-1594.
Read now
Richard K. Coll, Bev France & Ian Taylor. (2005) The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. International Journal of Science Education 27:2, pages 183-198.
Read now
RichardK. Coll & DavidF. Treagust. (2002) Exploring Tertiary Students' Understanding of Covalent Bonding. Research in Science & Technological Education 20:2, pages 241-267.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (55)

Ayesha Farheen, Hang T. Nguyen, Isaiah Nelsen & Scott E. Lewis. (2024) Students’ Approaches to Determining the Location of Intermolecular Force between Two Distinct Molecules. Journal of Chemical Education 101:3, pages 766-776.
Crossref
Lejla Jelovica, Nataša Erceg, Vanes Mešić & Ivica Aviani. (2024) Students’ Understanding of Microscopic Models of Electrical and Thermal Conductivity: Findings within the Development of a Multiple-Choice Concept Inventory. Education Sciences 14:3, pages 275.
Crossref
Leonora Kaldaras, Hope O. Akaeze & Joseph Krajcik. (2023) Developing and validating an Next Generation Science Standards‐aligned construct map for chemical bonding from the energy and force perspective . Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Crossref
Şenol Şen, Senar Temel & Özgür Özcan. (2023) Determination of comprehension levels of prospective chemistry teachers related to covalent bonding by using concept cartoons strategy. Main Group Chemistry 22:3, pages 439-451.
Crossref
R. Vladusic, R. B. Bucat & M. Ozic. (2023) Understanding covalent bonding – a scan across the Croatian education system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 24:1, pages 108-131.
Crossref
Monica Prima Sari & Rahmah Evita Putri. Science student teachers’ understanding about atom: An investigation on prior knowledge. Science student teachers’ understanding about atom: An investigation on prior knowledge.
Kathleen A. Bowe, Christopher F. Bauer, Ying Wang & Scott E. Lewis. (2022) When All You Have Is a Covalent Model of Bonding, Every Substance Is a Molecule: A Longitudinal Study of Student Enactment of Covalent and Ionic Bonding Models. Journal of Chemical Education 99:8, pages 2808-2820.
Crossref
Alex L. PalmerJulia P. Sarju. (2022) Inclusive Outreach Activity Targeting Negative Alternate Conceptions of Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 99:5, pages 1827-1837.
Crossref
Yıldızay AYYILDIZ & Esra ÇUBUKÇU. (2022) 9. Sınıf Kimya Konularındaki Yanlış Kavramalar Üzerine Bir İçerik AnaliziA Content Analysis on the Misconceptions in 9th Grade Chemistry Subjects. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi 7:1, pages 73-124.
Crossref
Nataša Erceg, Lejla Jelovica, Zdeslav Hrepić, Vanes Mešić, Marin Karuza & Ivica Aviani. (2021) University students’ conceptual understanding of microscopic models of electrical and thermal conduction in solids. European Journal of Physics 42:4, pages 045702.
Crossref
Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez, Avery R. Stricker & Nicole M. Becker. (2020) Exploring the Productive Use of Metonymy: Applying Coordination Class Theory to Investigate Student Conceptions of Rate in Relation to Reaction Coordinate Diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education 97:8, pages 2065-2077.
Crossref
Filiz Avcı, Fatma Gülay Kırbaşlar & Burçin Acar Şeşen. (2019) Instructional curriculum based on cooperative learning related to the structure of matter and its properties: Learning achievement, motivation and attitude. South African Journal of Education 39:., pages 1-14.
Crossref
Şenol ŞEN, Lütfiye VAROĞLU & Ayhan YILMAZ. (2019) Cognitive Structures and Misconceptions with a Thematic Framework: The Case of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Education and Future:16, pages 65-78.
Crossref
M Meltafina, W Wiji & S Mulyani. (2019) Misconceptions and threshold concepts in chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157, pages 042030.
Crossref
Dr. Melek Nur ERDOĞAN. (2018) Üstün/Özel Yeteneklilerde Atomun Yapısı Konusunun Öğretiminde Bütüncül Yaklaşımla Program FarklılaştırmaCurriculum Differentiation with a Holistic Approach in the Teaching of Atomic Structure to Gifted Students. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 19:3, pages 714-737.
Crossref
Filiz AVCI, Burçin ACAR ŞEŞEN & Fatma Gülay KIRBAŞLAR. (2018) Maddenin Yapısı ve Özelikleri Ünitesine Yönelik İki Aşamalı Teşhis Testinin GeliştirilmesiThe Development of Two-Tier Concept Test for The Structure and Properties of Matter Unit. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 26:4, pages 1007-1019.
Crossref
Gürkan GEÇGEL & Ali Rıza ŞEKERCİ. (2018) Bazı Kimya Konularındaki Alternatif Kavramların Tanılayıcı Dallanmış Ağaç Tekniği Kullanarak BelirlenmesiIdentifying Alternative Concepts In Some Chemistry Topics Using The Diagnostic Branched Tree Technique. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 14:1, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Supawadee Sarawan & Chokchai Yuenyong. Thai students’ mental model of chemical bonding. Thai students’ mental model of chemical bonding.
Rüveyda Yavuz & Funda Savaşcı-Açıkalın. (2018) How the seventh grade students visualize atomic structure and models. SHS Web of Conferences 48, pages 01041.
Crossref
Georgios Tsaparlis, Eleni T. Pappa & Bill Byers. (2018) Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19:4, pages 1253-1269.
Crossref
Gülüzar Eymur & Ömer Geban. (2016) The Collaboration of Cooperative Learning and Conceptual Change: Enhancing the Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15:5, pages 853-871.
Crossref
Bhawani Venkataraman. (2017) Emphasizing the Significance of Electrostatic Interactions in Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education 94:3, pages 296-303.
Crossref
Ayfer Mutlu & Burçin Acar Şeşen. (2016) EVALUATING OF PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ UNDERSTANDING OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY CONCEPTS BY USING TWO TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST. Journal of Baltic Science Education 15:1, pages 79-96.
Crossref
Cynthia J. Luxford & Thomas A. Holme. (2015) What Do Conceptual Holes in Assessment Say about the Topics We Teach in General Chemistry?. Journal of Chemical Education 92:6, pages 993-1002.
Crossref
Uce Musa. (2015) Constructing models in teaching of chemical bonds: Ionic bond, covalent bond, double and triple bonds, hydrogen bond and molecular geometry. Educational Research and Reviews 10:4, pages 491-500.
Crossref
Nikita L. Burrows & Suazette Reid Mooring. (2015) Using concept mapping to uncover students' knowledge structures of chemical bonding concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16:1, pages 53-66.
Crossref
Bellam Sreenivasulu & R. Subramaniam. (2014) Exploring Undergraduates’ Understanding of Transition Metals Chemistry with the use of Cognitive and Confidence Measures. Research in Science Education 44:6, pages 801-828.
Crossref
Filiz Avcı, Burçin Acar Şeşen & Fatma Gülay Kırbaşlar. (2014) Determination of Seventh Grade Students’ Understanding of Certain Chemistry Concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152, pages 602-606.
Crossref
Michael Croft & Kevin de Berg. (2014) From Common Sense Concepts to Scientifically Conditioned Concepts of Chemical Bonding: An Historical and Textbook Approach Designed to Address Learning and Teaching Issues at the Secondary School Level. Science & Education 23:9, pages 1733-1761.
Crossref
Aytekin Cokelez, Burçkin Dal & Gonca Harman. (2014) TURKISH MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CONCEPTIONS AND MODELLING OF CHEMICAL BONDS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 13:4, pages 483-496.
Crossref
Resa M. Kelly. (2014) Using Variation Theory with Metacognitive Monitoring To Develop Insights into How Students Learn from Molecular Visualizations. Journal of Chemical Education 91:8, pages 1152-1161.
Crossref
Gulten Sendur. (2014) Are creative comparisons developed by prospective chemistry teachers evidence of their conceptual understanding? The case of inter- and intramolecular forces. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 689-719.
Crossref
Ray Lee & Maurice M. W. Cheng. 2014. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education 403 417 .
Hakan Kurt. (2013) DETERMINING BIOLOGY TEACHER CANDIDATES' CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES ABOUT ENERGY AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS ENERGY. Journal of Baltic Science Education 12:4, pages 399-423.
Crossref
Cynthia J. Luxford & Stacey Lowery Bretz. (2013) Moving beyond definitions: what student-generated models reveal about their understanding of covalent bonding and ionic bonding. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:2, pages 214-222.
Crossref
Yıldızay Ayyıldız & Leman Tarhan. (2013) Case study applications in chemistry lesson: gases, liquids, and solids. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 408-420.
Crossref
Burcin Acar Sesen. (2013) Diagnosing pre-service science teachers' understanding of chemistry concepts by using computer-mediated predict–observe–explain tasks. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:3, pages 239-246.
Crossref
Sandra Tan & Russell Waugh. 2013. 3D Immersive and Interactive Learning. 3D Immersive and Interactive Learning 17 43 .
Keith S. Taber. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education 391 418 .
Takbir Ali. (2012) A Case Study of the Common Difficulties Experienced by High School Students in Chemistry Classroom in Gilgit-Baltistan (Pakistan). SAGE Open 2:2, pages 215824401244729.
Crossref
K. Christopher Smith & Mary B. Nakhleh. (2011) University students' conceptions of bonding in melting and dissolving phenomena. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 12:4, pages 398-408.
Crossref
Richard K. Coll & Denis Lajium. 2011. Models and Modeling. Models and Modeling 3 21 .
Melanie M. Cooper, Nathaniel Grove, Sonia M. Underwood & Michael W. Klymkowsky. (2010) Lost in Lewis Structures: An Investigation of Student Difficulties in Developing Representational Competence. Journal of Chemical Education 87:8, pages 869-874.
Crossref
Haluk Özmen, Hülya Demircioğlu & Gökhan Demircioğlu. (2009) The effects of conceptual change texts accompanied with animations on overcoming 11th grade students’ alternative conceptions of chemical bonding. Computers & Education 52:3, pages 681-695.
Crossref
Richard K. Coll. (2009) Do Gifted Students View and Use Mental Models Differently from Others?. Educación Química 20:1, pages 18-31.
Crossref
Haluk Özmen. (2008) The influence of computer-assisted instruction on students’ conceptual understanding of chemical bonding and attitude toward chemistry: A case for Turkey. Computers & Education 51:1, pages 423-438.
Crossref
S. Khan. (2007) The case in case-based design of educational software: A methodological interrogation. Educational Technology Research and Development 56:4, pages 423-447.
Crossref
Burcin Acar & Leman Tarhan. (2007) Effects of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Understanding of Metallic Bonding. Research in Science Education 38:4, pages 401-420.
Crossref
Leman Tarhan, Hulya Ayar-Kayali, Raziye Ozturk Urek & Burcin Acar. (2007) Problem-Based Learning in 9th Grade Chemistry Class: ‘Intermolecular Forces’. Research in Science Education 38:3, pages 285-300.
Crossref
Karim M. Hamza & Per‐Olof Wickman. (2007) Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education 92:1, pages 141-164.
Crossref
Muammer Çalik, Alipaşa Ayas & Richard Kevin Coll. (2005) Enhancing Pre-service Elementary Teachers' Conceptual Understanding of Solution Chemistry with Conceptual Change Text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5:1, pages 1-28.
Crossref
Rachel Mamlok-Naaman, Oshrit Navon, Miriam Carmeli & Avi Hofstein. 2005. Research and the Quality of Science Education. Research and the Quality of Science Education 141 155 .
Keith S. Taber. (2003) Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner's prior learning. Science Education 87:5, pages 732-758.
Crossref
Richard K. Coll & David F. Treagust. (2003) Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40:5, pages 464-486.
Crossref
Keith S. Taber & Richard K. Coll. 2003. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice 213 234 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.