40
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Two Different Methods of Assessing Practical Skills at an Advanced Level Examination in Biology: demonstration of construct validity or the appraisal of non‐events?

, &
Pages 23-35 | Published online: 07 Jul 2006

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (5)

P. S. C. Matthews & P. J. McKenna. (2005) Assessment of Practical Work in Ireland: A critique. International Journal of Science Education 27:10, pages 1211-1224.
Read now
C. R. Brown, J. L. Moore, B. E. Silkstone & C. Botton. (1996) The Construct Validity and Context Dependency of Teacher Assessment of Practical Skills in Some Pre‐university Level Science Examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 3:3, pages 377-392.
Read now
C. R. Brown, J. L. Moore & B. E. Silkstone. (1995) The Validity of Project Assessment in an Advanced Level Biology Examination. Research in Science & Technological Education 13:1, pages 77-88.
Read now
C. R. Brown & J. L. Moore. (1994) Construct Validity and Context Dependency of the Assessment of Practical Skills in an Advanced Level Biology Examination. Research in Science & Technological Education 12:1, pages 53-61.
Read now
P.J. Black. (1993) Formative and Summative Assessment by Teachers. Studies in Science Education 21:1, pages 49-97.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (3)

Nico Schreiber & Christoph Gut. (2022) Die Validierungspraxis bei hands-on Experimentiertests in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen ForschungThe Validation Practice of Performance Assessments Using Practical Tasks in Science Education Research. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 28:1.
Crossref
Chris R. Brown. (1998) An evaluation of two different methods of assessing independent investigations in an operational pre-university level examination in Biology in England. Studies in Educational Evaluation 24:1, pages 87-98.
Crossref
Paul Black. (1995) Assessment and feedback in science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation 21:3, pages 257-279.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.