Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 22, 2008 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
294
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

The Argument from Underconsideration as Grounds for Anti‐realism: A Defence

K. Brad WrayCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 317-326 | Published online: 05 Dec 2008

Citations (32)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (4)

Moti Mizrahi. (2013) The Argument from Underconsideration and Relative Realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27:4, pages 393-407.
Read now
Timothy D. Lyons. (2013) A Historically Informed Modus Ponens Against Scientific Realism: Articulation, Critique, and Restoration. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27:4, pages 369-392.
Read now
Kareem Khalifa. (2010) Default Privilege and Bad Lots: Underconsideration and Explanatory Inference. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24:1, pages 91-105.
Read now
TimothyD. Lyons. (2009) Non‐competitor Conditions in the Scientific Realism Debate. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23:1, pages 65-84.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (28)

Yunus Prasetya. (2024) Which Models of Scientific Explanation Are (In)Compatible with Inference to the Best Explanation?. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75:1, pages 209-232.
Crossref
Sandeep Devanatha Pillai, Brent Goldfarb & David Kirsch. (2024) Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy. Strategic Management Journal.
Crossref
DEVANATHA SANDEEP PILLAI, Brent D. Goldfarb & David Kirsch. (2023) Lovely and Likely: Using Historical Methods to Improve Inference to the Best Explanation in Strategy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Michael J. Shaffer. (2022) Integrating Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy XIV:2.
Crossref
Byeong D. Lee. (2019) A Coherentist Justification of Induction. Erkenntnis 87:1, pages 35-52.
Crossref
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 155 176 .
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 115 133 .
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 89 114 .
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 45 66 .
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 23 43 .
Seungbae ParkSeungbae Park. 2022. Embracing Scientific Realism. Embracing Scientific Realism 1 22 .
Finnur Dellsén. (2020) Explanatory Consolidation: From ‘Best’ to ‘Good Enough’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103:1, pages 157-177.
Crossref
Jim Granato, Melody Lo & M. C. Sunny Wong. 2021. Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models in Political Science. Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models in Political Science.
James R. Beebe & Finnur Dellsén. (2022) Scientific Realism in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Seven Sciences and History and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 87:2, pages 336-364.
Crossref
Seungbae Park. (2019) How to Overcome Antirealists’ Objections to Scientific Realism. Axiomathes 30:1, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Moti MizrahiMoti Mizrahi. 2020. The Relativity of Theory. The Relativity of Theory 109 162 .
Moti MizrahiMoti Mizrahi. 2020. The Relativity of Theory. The Relativity of Theory 79 108 .
Seungbae Park. (2019) How to Formulate Scientific Realism and Antirealism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 50:4, pages 477-488.
Crossref
Seungbae Park. (2018) The Anti-induction for Scientific Realism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 95:3, pages 329-342.
Crossref
J. Brian Pitts. (2017) Kant, Schlick and Friedman on Space, Time and Gravity in Light of Three Lessons from Particle Physics. Erkenntnis 83:2, pages 135-161.
Crossref
Seungbae Park. (2016) The Uniformity Principle vs. the Disuniformity Principle. Acta Analytica 32:2, pages 213-222.
Crossref
Seungbae Park. (2016) Problems with Using Evolutionary Theory in Philosophy. Axiomathes 27:3, pages 321-332.
Crossref
Finnur Dells?n. (2017) Reactionary responses to the Bad Lot Objection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61, pages 32-40.
Crossref
Kevin McCainKevin McCain. 2016. The Nature of Scientific Knowledge. The Nature of Scientific Knowledge 155 170 .
Kevin McCain. (2015) Explanation and the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. Science & Education 24:7-8, pages 827-854.
Crossref
K. Brad Wray. (2011) Success and truth in the realism/anti-realism debate. Synthese 190:9, pages 1719-1729.
Crossref
K. Brad Wray. (2010) Epistemic Privilege and the Success of Science . Noûs 46:3, pages 375-385.
Crossref
K. Brad Wray. (2010) Selection and Predictive Success. Erkenntnis 72:3, pages 365-377.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.