1,598
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

The Global Warming of Climate Science: Climategate and the Construction of Scientific Facts

Pages 287-307 | Published online: 06 Jan 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Antti Silvast, Simone Abram & Claire Copeland. (2023) Energy systems integration as research practice. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 35:3, pages 302-313.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (20)

Bernhard Isopp. (2024) The politics of politicization: Climate change debates in Canadian print media. Public Understanding of Science.
Crossref
John P. Wilson. (2021) Making Information Measurement Meaningful: The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and the Social and Human Capital Protocol. Information 12:8, pages 338.
Crossref
Jeremy Aroles & Christine McLean. (2019) Smoothing, striating and territorializing: The assembling of ‘science in the making’. Ethnography 22:1, pages 111-130.
Crossref
Benjamin K. Sovacool, David J. Hess, Sulfikar Amir, Frank W. Geels, Richard Hirsh, Leandro Rodriguez Medina, Clark Miller, Carla Alvial Palavicino, Roopali Phadke, Marianne Ryghaug, Johan Schot, Antti Silvast, Jennie Stephens, Andy Stirling, Bruno Turnheim, Erik van der Vleuten, Harro van Lente & Steven Yearley. (2020) Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research. Energy Research & Social Science 70, pages 101617.
Crossref
Sujatha Raman & Warren Pearce. (2020) Learning the lessons of Climategate: A cosmopolitan moment in the public life of climate science. WIREs Climate Change 11:6.
Crossref
Antti Silvast, Erik Laes, Simone Abram & Gunter Bombaerts. (2020) What do energy modellers know? An ethnography of epistemic values and knowledge models. Energy Research & Social Science 66, pages 101495.
Crossref
Ferenc Jankó, Judit Papp Vancsó & Norbert Móricz. (2017) Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics. Scientometrics 112:3, pages 1745-1759.
Crossref
Mathis Hampel. (2016) Have climate sceptics taken the bait? What the deconstruction of instrumental climate records can tell us about the politics of climate change. Area 48:2, pages 244-248.
Crossref
Amir Shani & Boaz Arad. (2015) There is always time for rational skepticism: Reply to Hall et al. Tourism Management 47, pages 348-351.
Crossref
Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani. 2015. Objectivity in Science. Objectivity in Science 1 15 .
Ferenc Jankó, Norbert Móricz & Judit Papp Vancsó. (2014) Reviewing the climate change reviewers: Exploring controversy through report references and citations. Geoforum 56, pages 17-34.
Crossref
Bernhard Isopp. 2014. Activist Science and Technology Education. Activist Science and Technology Education 307 321 .
Eirik Frøhaug Swensen. (2013) Rammer for handling? Klimaskeptikere i den norske klimadebatten. Sosiologisk tidsskrift 21:2, pages 133-151.
Crossref
Pauline Huet. (2013) Pour un climat de clarté ? Usages et mésusages de la transparence sur l’expertise scientifique en situation de controverse. Éthique publique 15:1.
Crossref
Sunniva Eikeland Tøsse. (2012) Aiming for Social or Political Robustness? Media Strategies Among Climate Scientists. Science Communication 35:1, pages 32-55.
Crossref
James W. McAllister. (2022) Climate Science Controversies and the Demand for Access to Empirical Data. Philosophy of Science 79:5, pages 871-880.
Crossref
John R. Turnpenny. (2012) Lessons from post‐normal science for climate science‐sceptic debates. WIREs Climate Change 3:5, pages 397-407.
Crossref
Reiner Grundmann. (2012) The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?. WIREs Climate Change 3:3, pages 281-288.
Crossref
Jeanine Finn. (2013) The role of networks in science communication and engagement with non‐expert publics. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49:1, pages 1-4.
Crossref
Richard Holliman. (2011) Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism 12:7, pages 832-846.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.