624
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Are Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem

ORCID Icon

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Stefaan Blancke & Maarten Boudry. (2021) Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34:3, pages 183-198.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (4)

Angelo Fasce. (2022) The explanation-polarisation model: Pseudoscience spreads through explanatory satisfaction and group polarisation. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 10:2, pages 693-705.
Crossref
Maarten Boudry. (2022) Why We Should Be Suspicious of Conspiracy Theories: A Novel Demarcation Problem. Episteme, pages 1-21.
Crossref
Kåre Letrud. (2022) Do we Know it When we See it? A Review of ‘Pseudoscience’ Patterns of Usage. Episteme, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Maarten Boudry. (2021) Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53:2, pages 83-101.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.