26
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Causal judgement from contingency information: Judging interactions between two causal candidates

Pages 819-838 | Published online: 22 Sep 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (6)

José Perales & Andrés Catena. (2006) Human causal induction: A glimpse at the whole picture. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18:2, pages 277-320.
Read now
Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Valerie A. Thompson & Kevin N. Dunbar. (2006) Examining the representation of causal knowledge. Thinking & Reasoning 12:1, pages 1-30.
Read now
Peter A. White. (2005) Cue interaction effects in causal judgement: An interpretation in terms of the evidential evaluation model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B 58:2, pages 99-140.
Read now
Peter A. White. (2004) Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: Effects of relative prevalence of the two causes . The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 57:6, pages 961-991.
Read now
Peter A. White. (2003) Causal judgement as evaluation of evidence: The use of confirmatory and disconfirrnatory information. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 56:3, pages 491-513.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (5)

Saisai Ma, Lin Liu, Jiuyong Li & Thuc Duy Le. (2019) Data-driven discovery of causal interactions. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics 8:3, pages 285-297.
Crossref
R.M. Msetfi, N. Byrom & R.A. Murphy. (2017) To neglect or integrate contingency information from outside the task frame, that is the question! Effects of depressed mood. Acta Psychologica 178, pages 1-11.
Crossref
Cristina Díez‐Alegría, Carmelo Vázquez & María J. Hernández‐Lloreda. (2010) Covariation assessment for neutral and emotional verbal stimuli in paranoid delusions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 47:4, pages 427-437.
Crossref
Peter A. White. (2004) Causal judgment from contingency information: A systematic test of thepCI rule. Memory & Cognition 32:3, pages 353-368.
Crossref
Jonathan A. Fugelsang & Valerie A. Thompson. (2003) A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning. Memory & Cognition 31:5, pages 800-815.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.