Advanced search
Publication Cover
Roeper Review Volume 32, 2009 - Issue 1: Stem High Schools
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,201
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Stem High Schools

Specialized Public High Schools of Science, Mathematics, and Technology and the STEM Pipeline: What Do We Know Now and What Will We Know in 5 Years?

Rena F. SubotnikCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Robert H. Tai
,
Rochelle Rickoff
&
John Almarode
Pages 7-16 | Received 17 Jul 2008, Accepted 15 Sep 2008, Published online: 28 Dec 2009

Citations (69)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (15)

Majken Korsager, Kirsten Fiskum, Berit Reitan & Sibel Erduran. (2022) Nature of science in science textbooks for vocational training in Norway. Research in Science & Technological Education 0:0, pages 1-16.
Read now
Eva Lyon, Rebecca L. Freeman, Justin Bathon, Alan Fryar, Michael McGlue, Andrea M. Erhardt, Ashley Rosen, Shannon Sampson, Andrew Nelson & Joshua Parsons. (2020) Attitudinal impediments to geology major recruitment among ninth graders at a STEM high school. Journal of Geoscience Education 68:3, pages 237-253.
Read now
Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Mohamad Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman & Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2019) Students’ interest towards STEM: a longitudinal study. Research in Science & Technological Education 37:1, pages 71-89.
Read now
Ali Bicer, Robert M. Capraro & Mary M. Capraro. (2018) Hispanic students’ mathematics achievement in the context of their high school types as STEM and non-STEM schools. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 49:5, pages 705-720.
Read now
Colby Tofel-Grehl, David F. Feldon & Carolyn M. Callahan. (2018) Impacts of Learning Standards and Testing on Gifted Learners in STEM Schools: A Multilevel Analytic Induction. Roeper Review 40:2, pages 130-138.
Read now
Erika C. Bullock. (2017) Only STEM Can Save Us? Examining Race, Place, and STEM Education as Property. Educational Studies 53:6, pages 628-641.
Read now
Erdogan Kaya, Anna Newley, Hasan Deniz, Ezgi Yesilyurt & Patrick Newley. (2017) Introducing Engineering Design to a Science Teaching Methods Course Through Educational Robotics and Exploring Changes in Views of Preservice Elementary Teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching 47:2, pages 66-75.
Read now
Colby Tofel-Grehl, Carolyn M. Callahan & Louis S. Nadelson. (2017) Comparative analyses of discourse in specialized STEM school classes. The Journal of Educational Research 110:3, pages 294-307.
Read now
P. Daniel Chen & Patricia A. Simpson. (2015) Does Personality Matter? Applying Holland's Typology to Analyze Students' Self-Selection into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Majors. The Journal of Higher Education 86:5, pages 725-750.
Read now
Eugene Judson. (2014) Effects of Transferring to STEM-Focused Charter and Magnet Schools on Student Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research 107:4, pages 255-266.
Read now
Patricia Solís & InesM. Miyares. (2014) Introduction: Rethinking Practices for Enhancing Diversity in the Discipline. The Professional Geographer 66:2, pages 169-172.
Read now
Kate Goforth, Amity Noltemeyer, Jon Patton, Kevin R. Bush & Doris Bergen. (2014) Understanding mathematics achievement: an analysis of the effects of student and family factors. Educational Studies 40:2, pages 196-214.
Read now
ErinE. Peters-Burton, SharonJ. Lynch, TaraS. Behrend & BarbaraB. Means. (2014) Inclusive STEM High School Design: 10 Critical Components. Theory Into Practice 53:1, pages 64-71.
Read now
LeahD. Pride. (2014) Using Learning Stories to Capture “Gifted” and “Hard Worker” Mindsets within a NYC Specialized High School for the Sciences. Theory Into Practice 53:1, pages 41-47.
Read now
Donna M. Sayman. (2013) Quinceañeras and Quadratics: Experiences of Latinas in State-Supported Residential Schools of Science and Math. Journal of Latinos and Education 12:3, pages 215-230.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (54)

Zachary F. Miller & Dustin Crowther. (2023) Foreign language learning in a specialized institution: Opportunities and challenges. Foreign Language Annals 57:1, pages 48-66.
Crossref
Elena Rodríguez-Naveiras, Sergio Chinea, Triana Aguirre, Nathalia Manduca, Teresa González Pérez & África Borges. (2023) The Effects of Attitudes towards Mathematics and STEM Education on High-Ability Students and a Community Sample. Education Sciences 14:1, pages 41.
Crossref
Tara O'Neill, Bella Melenaite Finau‐Faumuina & Tessie Uʻilani Lumabao Ford. (2023) Toward decolonizing STEM : Centering place and sense of place for community‐based problem‐solving . Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:8, pages 1755-1785.
Crossref
Juah Kim, Hyunjung Im, Doehee Ahn & Seokhee Cho. (2023) How Does an Inquiry-Based Instructional Approach Predict the STEM Creative Productivity of Specialized Science High School Students?. Education Sciences 13:8, pages 773.
Crossref
Alandeon W. Oliveira, Junhong Wang, Crystal Perno, Jerald Brotzge & Amita Verma. (2022) The Backyard Weather Science Curriculum: Using a Weather-Observing Network to Support Data-Intensive Issue-Based Atmospheric Inquiry in Middle and High School. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:2, pages 181-210.
Crossref
Tara O’Neill, Anna Ah Sam, Shari Jumalon, Kimberlee Stuart & MaryAnna Enriquez. 2023. Indigenous STEM Education. Indigenous STEM Education 157 189 .
Isha DeCoito & Lisa K. Briona. 2023. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education. Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education 195 222 .
Lena Steidtmann, Thilo Kleickmann & Mirjam Steffensky. (2022) Declining interest in science in lower secondary school classes: Quasi‐experimental and longitudinal evidence on the role of teaching and teaching quality . Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:1, pages 164-195.
Crossref
Gülşah Avcı Doğan. 2022. Advancing STEM Education and Innovation in a Time of Distance Learning. Advancing STEM Education and Innovation in a Time of Distance Learning 73 92 .
Sheretta T. Butler-Barnes, Bridget Cheeks, David L. Barnes & Habiba Ibrahim. (2021) STEM Pipeline: Mathematics Beliefs, Attitudes, and Opportunities of Racial/Ethnic Minority Girls. Journal for STEM Education Research 4:3, pages 301-328.
Crossref
Jingoo Kang, Tuula Keinonen & Anssi Salonen. (2019) Role of Interest and Self-Concept in Predicting Science Aspirations: Gender Study. Research in Science Education 51:S1, pages 513-535.
Crossref
N M Nawawi, N M Sout, K B Hassan, N N A Samah, H H Kamaruddin, R M Khalid & H H Azman. (2021) The perception of pre-university students on STEM. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1882:1, pages 012155.
Crossref
G.D. Yüreğilli, S.N. Şakar, M. Bicakci & M.S. Köksal. (2021) Full-time Schooling for Gifted Students in Turkey: What Teachers and Experts Say about This?. Clinical Psychology and Special Education Клиническая и специальная психология 10:3, pages 208-230.
Crossref
Mohamed El Nagdi & Gillian Roehrig. (2020) Identity evolution of STEM teachers in Egyptian STEM schools in a time of transition: a case study. International Journal of STEM Education 7:1.
Crossref
Erin Peters Burton, Tara S. Behrend, Shari Matray, Clarissa Hudson & Michael Ford. (2020) Development and validation of a high school STEM self‐assessment inventory. School Science and Mathematics 120:8, pages 477-490.
Crossref
Ninger Zhou, Christian Fischer, Fernando Rodriguez, Mark Warschauer & Susan King. (2019) Exploring how enrolling in an online organic chemistry preparation course relates to students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 32:3, pages 505-528.
Crossref
Regina Soobard, Tormi Kotkas, Jack Holbrook & Miia Rannikmae. (2020) Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention Course Designed to Raise Science-Related Career Awareness. European Journal of Educational Research volume-9-2020:volume-9-issue-4-october-2020, pages 1539-1555.
Crossref
William Romine, Chia-Lin Tsai, Michele Miller, Nai-En Tang & William Folk. (2019) Evaluation of a Process by which Individual Interest Supports Learning Within a Formal Middle School Classroom Context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18:7, pages 1419-1439.
Crossref
Ali Bicer, Yujin Lee & Celal Perihan. (2020) Inclusive STEM High School Factors Influencing Ethnic Minority Students’ STEM Preparation. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, pages 147-172.
Crossref
Huifang Zuo, Kaitlyn A. Ferris & Melanie LaForce. (2019) Reducing Racial and Gender Gaps in Mathematics Attitudes: Investigating the Use of Instructional Strategies in Inclusive STEM High Schools. Journal for STEM Education Research 3:1, pages 125-146.
Crossref
Ameer Emran, Ornit Spektor-levy, Ofra Paz Tal & Orit Ben Zvi Assaraf. (2020) Understanding Students’ Perceptions of the Nature of Science in the Context of Their Gender and Their Parents’ Occupation. Science & Education 29:2, pages 237-261.
Crossref
Anita Crowder, Rebecca Dovi & David Naff. 2020. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. Integrated Approaches to STEM Education 447 467 .
Luronne Vaval, Alex J. Bowers & Virginia Snodgrass Rangel. (2019) Identifying a typology of high schools based on their orientation toward STEM: A latent class analysis of HSLS:09. Science Education 103:5, pages 1151-1175.
Crossref
K. Ann Renninger & Suzanne E. HidiJoyce M. Alexander, Kathy E. Johnson & Carin Neitzel. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning 312 352 .
Ali Bicer & R. M. Capraro. (2019) Mathematics achievement in the secondary high school context of STEM and non‐STEM schools. School Science and Mathematics 119:2, pages 61-71.
Crossref
Brandy Huderson & Ashley Huderson. 2019. K-12 STEM Education in Urban Learning Environments. K-12 STEM Education in Urban Learning Environments 1 24 .
Colmore Christian, Santosh Ojha & Berneece Herbert. (2018) Minority High School Students in Non-Math-Science-Oriented and Math-Science-Oriented Majors: Do They View the Environment Differently?. Social Sciences 7:8, pages 130.
Crossref
Colleen M. Ganley, Casey E. George, Joseph R. Cimpian & Martha B. Makowski. (2017) Gender Equity in College Majors: Looking Beyond the STEM/Non-STEM Dichotomy for Answers Regarding Female Participation. American Educational Research Journal 55:3, pages 453-487.
Crossref
Matthew Kloser, Matthew Wilsey, Dawn W. Hopkins, Julie W. Dallavis, Erin Lavin & Michael Comuniello. (2017) Dual identities: organizational negotiation in STEM-focused Catholic schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education 13:2, pages 549-579.
Crossref
Behiç AYTEKİN. (2018) FeTeMM YAKLAŞIMININ İŞLERLİĞİNİN ARTMASI ADINA GÖRSEL İLETİŞİM TASARIMI YÖNTEMLERİNİN EĞİTİM SİSTEMİNE ADAPTE EDİLMESİTHE ADOPTION OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION DESIGN METHODS ON THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM FOR THE INCREASE OF STEM APPROACH. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi 6:1, pages 457-483.
Crossref
Yuyang Sun & Qingzhong Li. (2018) The application of 3D printing in STEM education. The application of 3D printing in STEM education.
Natalie Stipanovic & Hongryun Woo. (2017) Understanding African American Students' Experiences in STEM Education: An Ecological Systems Approach. The Career Development Quarterly 65:3, pages 192-206.
Crossref
Jamie L. Jensen, Shannon Neeley, Jordan B. Hatch & Ted Piorczynski. (2015) Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills May Be Key to Retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 19:2, pages 126-144.
Crossref
Colby Tofel-Grehl, Deborah Fields, Kristin Searle, Cathy Maahs-Fladung, David Feldon, Grace Gu & Chongning Sun. (2017) Electrifying Engagement in Middle School Science Class: Improving Student Interest Through E-textiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:4, pages 406-417.
Crossref
Patricia A. Alexander. (2016) Relational Reasoning in STEM Domains: a Foundation for Academic Development. Educational Psychology Review 29:1, pages 1-10.
Crossref
Colby Tofel-Grehl & Carolyn M. Callahan. (2016) STEM High Schools Teachers’ Belief Regarding STEM Student Giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly 61:1, pages 40-51.
Crossref
Yossy Machluf, Hadas Gelbart, Shifra Ben-Dor & Anat Yarden. (2017) Making authentic science accessible—the benefits and challenges of integrating bioinformatics into a high-school science curriculum. Briefings in Bioinformatics 18:1, pages 145-159.
Crossref
John Almarode, Rena F. Subotnik & G. Maie Lee. (2016) Specialized STEM High Schools. Gifted Child Today 39:4, pages 181-182.
Crossref
John Almarode, Rena Subotnik & G. Maie Lee. (2016) What Works. Gifted Child Today 39:4, pages 185-190.
Crossref
Sarah E. Shoemaker, Christopher Thomas, Todd Roberts & Robin Boltz. (2016) Building a Mentorship-Based Research Program Focused on Individual Interests, Curiosity, and Professional Skills at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics. Gifted Child Today 39:4, pages 191-204.
Crossref
Lauren Valentino, Stephanie Moller, Elizabeth Stearns & Roslyn Mickelson. (2016) Perceptions of Future Career Family Flexibility as a Deterrent from Majoring in STEM. Social Currents 3:3, pages 273-292.
Crossref
Ali Bicer, Peter Boedeker, Mahati Kopparla, Robert M. Capraro & Mary Margaret Capraro. (2015) Comparing students' mathematics achievement by their school types: Inclusive STEM schools that implemented PLTW curriculum with inclusive STEM schools that did not implement PLTW. Comparing students' mathematics achievement by their school types: Inclusive STEM schools that implemented PLTW curriculum with inclusive STEM schools that did not implement PLTW.
Jennifer Langer-Osuna. (2014) Linear equations and rap battles: how students in a wired classroom utilized the computer as a resource to coordinate personal and mathematical positional identities in hybrid spaces. Mathematics Education Research Journal 27:1, pages 51-64.
Crossref
Edy Hafizan Mohd Shahali, Lilia Halim, Sattar Rasul, Kamisah Osman, Zanaton Ikhsan & Faszly Rahim. (2015) BITARA-STEMTM TRAINING OF TRAINERS’ PROGRAMME: IMPACT ON TRAINERS’ KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS, ATTITUDES AND EFFICACY TOWARDS INTEGRATED STEM TEACHING. Journal of Baltic Science Education 14:1, pages 85-95.
Crossref
Louis J. BerkSharon L. Muret-WagstaffRiya GoyalJulie A. JoyalJames A. Gordon, Russell Faux & Nancy E. Oriol. (2014) Inspiring careers in STEM and healthcare fields through medical simulation embedded in high school science education. Advances in Physiology Education 38:3, pages 210-215.
Crossref
Colby Tofel-Grehl & Carolyn M. Callahan. (2014) STEM High School Communities. Journal of Advanced Academics 25:3, pages 237-271.
Crossref
Micah N. Bruce-Davis, E. Jean Gubbins, Cindy M. Gilson, Merzili Villanueva, Jennifer L. Foreman & Lisa DaVia Rubenstein. (2014) STEM High School Administrators’, Teachers’, and Students’ Perceptions of Curricular and Instructional Strategies and Practices. Journal of Advanced Academics 25:3, pages 272-306.
Crossref
Ann Robinson & Debbie Dailey. 2014. Gifted Education: Current Perspectives and Issues. Gifted Education: Current Perspectives and Issues 167 190 .
Angela Eeds, Chris Vanags, Jonathan Creamer, Mary Loveless, Amanda Dixon, Harvey Sperling, Glenn McCombs, Doug Robinson & Virginia L. Shepherd. (2014) The School for Science and Math at Vanderbilt: An Innovative Research-Based Program for High School Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education 13:2, pages 297-310.
Crossref
Mark E. Engberg & Gregory C. Wolniak. (2013) College Student Pathways to the STEM Disciplines. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 115:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Robert G. Lorenzini, Maurica S. Lewis & Jin Kim Montclare. (2011) College-Mentored Polymer/Materials Science Modules for Middle and High School Students. Journal of Chemical Education 88:8, pages 1105-1108.
Crossref
Rena F. Subotnik, Paula Olszewski-Kubilius & Frank C. Worrell. (2011) Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 12:1, pages 3-54.
Crossref
Lori C. Bland, Steve Coxon, Kimberley Chandler & Joyce Van Tassel-Baska. (2010) Science in the City: Meeting the Needs of Urban Gifted Students with Project Clarion. Gifted Child Today 33:4, pages 48-57.
Crossref
Rena F. Subotnik & Rochelle Rickoff. (2010) Should eminence based on outstanding innovation be the goal of gifted education and talent development? Implications for policy and research. Learning and Individual Differences 20:4, pages 358-364.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.