Advanced search
Publication Cover
Roeper Review Volume 33, 2010 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
800
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: Cross-Cultural Research on Academic Olympiad Competitions

Olympiad Studies: Competitions Provide Alternatives to Developing Talents That Serve National Interests

James Reed CampbellCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Herbert J. Walberg
Pages 8-17 | Received 10 Feb 2009, Accepted 06 Oct 2009, Published online: 18 Jan 2011

Citations (45)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (4)

Irene R. Faber, Lena Sloot, Lianne Hoogeveen, Marije T. Elferink-Gemser & Jörg Schorer. (2022) Western Approaches for the identification and development of talent in schools and sports contexts from 2009 to 2019 - a literature review. High Ability Studies 33:2, pages 135-168.
Read now
Nuri Balta & Mervi A. Asikainen. (2019) A comparison of Olympians' and regular students' approaches and successes in solving counterintuitive dynamics problems. International Journal of Science Education 41:12, pages 1644-1666.
Read now
Janet S. Blankenburg, Tim N. Höffler, Heide Peters & Ilka Parchmann. (2016) The effectiveness of a project day to introduce sixth grade students to science competitions. Research in Science & Technological Education 34:3, pages 342-358.
Read now
Detlef Urhahne, Lok Hang Ho, Ilka Parchmann & Sabine Nick. (2012) Attempting to predict success in the qualifying round of the International Chemistry Olympiad. High Ability Studies 23:2, pages 167-182.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (41)

Tolga Yuret. (2024) Career paths of the International Mathematics Olympiad (IMO) medalists. Scientometrics.
Crossref
Carola Garrecht, Anneke Steegh & Dustin Schiering. (2023) “We are sorry to inform you…”—The effects of early elimination on science competition participants’ career aspirations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 61:4, pages 841-872.
Crossref
Paul Leon Tschisgale, Anneke Steegh, Stefan Petersen, Marcus Kubsch, Peter Wulff & Knut Neumann. (2024) Are science competitions meeting their intentions? a case study on affective and cognitive predictors of success in the Physics Olympiad. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 6:1.
Crossref
Omar M Muammar. (2022) Impact of Mawhiba’s first award-winning gifted summer program in Saudi Arabia on students’ achievement, skills, and satisfaction. Gifted Education International 39:3, pages 286-302.
Crossref
Eva Treiber, Irene Neumann & Aiso Heinze. (2023) What’s mathematics doing here? The role of mathematics in German Physics Olympiad tasks. Frontiers in Education 8.
Crossref
Juah Kim, Suksil Han, Doehee Ahn & Seokhee Cho. (2023) Catalysts and Deterrents for STEAM Talent Development of Students from Economically-Disadvantaged Families Through Specialized STEAM Talent Residential High Schools. Gifted Education International 39:2, pages 129-147.
Crossref
Zhanna Dedovets, Mikhail Rodionov & Anna Novichkova. (2023) A Model for Teaching Mathematics to Gifted Students Based on an Effective Combination of Various Approaches for their Preparation. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 8:1, pages 138-148.
Crossref
Nenad VulovićR.R., Aleksandra MihajlovićM.M. & Jasmina MilinkovićV.V.. (2023) Gender differences at mathematics competitions in the Republic of Serbia. Inovacije u nastavi 36:3, pages 119-135.
Crossref
Artem P. Gulov. (2023) American tradition of intellectual competitions: contests and Olympiads. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities:4, pages 795-804.
Crossref
Novika Grasiaswaty, Khairun Nisa, Denawati Junia, Febri Nurrahmi, Radyum Ikono, Muhammad Fathii, Alfian Noviyanto & Asep Sukmayadi. (2022) Gender, School Background, Personality, and Performance of Gifted and Regular Students in Indonesian National Competitions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 45:4, pages 404-424.
Crossref
Yijie He, Bin Xiong, Tianqi Lin & Yong Zhang. (2022) Mathematics competitions in China: practice and influence. ZDM – Mathematics Education 54:5, pages 1087-1100.
Crossref
Franziska Rebholz, Jessika Golle, Maike Tibus, Evelin Ruth-Herbein, Korbinian Moeller & Ulrich Trautwein. (2022) Getting fit for the Mathematical Olympiad: positive effects on achievement and motivation?Fit für die Mathematik-Olympiade: Positive Effekte für Leistung und Motivation?. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 25:5, pages 1175-1198.
Crossref
Lv Sunzhong, Zhang Yong, Lei Peiyao & Xiong Bin. (2022) Internal Persistence and External Support—What Makes Chinese Teachers of the Mathematically Gifted Stick to Their Post?. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Daniel Dziob, Urszula Górska, Tomasz Kołodziej & Mojca Čepič. (2020) Physics competition to inspire learning and improve soft skills: a case of the Chain Experiment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32:1, pages 413-446.
Crossref
Firdevs İclal KARATAŞ AYDIN. (2021) The Needs of Gifted Middle School Students for Developing an Effective Mathematics Program. Journal of Individual Differences in Education 3:2, pages 30-43.
Crossref
Jae Yup Jung & Jihyun Lee. (2021) After the International Mathematical Olympiad: The Educational/Career Decisions and the Development of Mathematical Talent of Former Australian Olympians. Gifted Child Quarterly 65:3, pages 235-261.
Crossref
A. Kadir Bahar. (2020) Trends in Gender Disparities Among High-Achieving Students in Mathematics: An Analysis of the American Mathematics Competition (AMC). Gifted Child Quarterly 65:2, pages 167-184.
Crossref
Maxim V. Likhanov, Elina S. Tsigeman, Kostas A. Papageorgiou, Aydar F. Akmalov, Ildar A. Sabitov & Yulia V. Kovas. (2020) Ordinary extraordinary: Elusive group differences in personality and psychological difficulties between STEM‐gifted adolescents and their peers. British Journal of Educational Psychology 91:1, pages 78-100.
Crossref
Tin Lam Toh. 2021. Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation. Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation 137 152 .
Anneke Steegh, Tim Höffler, Lars Höft & Ilka Parchmann. (2020) First steps toward gender equity in the chemistry Olympiad: Understanding the role of implicit gender‐science stereotypes . Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:1, pages 40-68.
Crossref
Sebastian Opitz & Ute Harms. (2020) Assessing High Performers in the Life Sciences: Characteristics of Exams Used at the International Biology Olympiad (IBO) and Their Implications for Life Science Education. CBE—Life Sciences Education 19:4, pages ar55.
Crossref
Oscar F. Bernal Pedraza. (2020) Theoretical Framework for Research on Mathematical Olympiads in Latin America. EDU REVIEW. International Education and Learning Review / Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 8:2, pages 95-101.
Crossref
Lijuan Yan & Yanshen Liu. (2020) An Ensemble Prediction Model for Potential Student Recommendation Using Machine Learning. Symmetry 12:5, pages 728.
Crossref
Xenia Mountrouidou, David Vosen, Chadi Kari, Mohammad Q. Azhar, Sajal Bhatia, Greg Gagne, Joseph Maguire, Liviana Tudor & Timothy T. Yuen. (2019) Securing the Human. Securing the Human.
Anneke M. Steegh, Tim N. Höffler, Melanie M. Keller & Ilka Parchmann. (2019) Gender differences in mathematics and science competitions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56:10, pages 1431-1460.
Crossref
Filipa Oliveira & José António Paixão. (2019) The RC circuit with an Olympic twist . Physics Education 54:3, pages 035002.
Crossref
Natalya Vladimirovna Efimova, Tatyana Viktorovna Shilkova & Tatyana Leonidovna Sokolova. (2019) Improving the content of schoolchildren training for the practical round of the regional stage of the All-Russian Biological Olympiad. Samara Journal of Science 8:2, pages 334-341.
Crossref
Khafiza Yagafarova & Evgeniya Kamennaya. (2019) Activation of the cognitive activity of students of a technical university through the individualization of education. SHS Web of Conferences 69, pages 00133.
Crossref
Petri Nokelainen, Laura Pylväs & Heta Rintala. 2019. Handbook of Vocational Education and Training. Handbook of Vocational Education and Training 1239 1250 .
Peter Wulff, Zahra Hazari, Stefan Petersen & Knut Neumann. (2018) Engaging young women in physics: An intervention to support young women’s physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:2.
Crossref
Michael H. Dunn & Laurence D. Merkle. (2018) Assessing the Impact of a National Cybersecurity Competition on Students' Career Interests. Assessing the Impact of a National Cybersecurity Competition on Students' Career Interests.
Petri Nokelainen, Laura Pylväs & Heta Rintala. 2019. Handbook of Vocational Education and Training. Handbook of Vocational Education and Training 1 13 .
S Petersen & P Wulff. (2017) The German Physics Olympiad—identifying and inspiring talents. European Journal of Physics 38:3, pages 034005.
Crossref
Daniel Dziob, Urszula Górska & Tomasz Kołodziej. (2017) Chain Experiment competition inspires learning of physics. European Journal of Physics 38:3, pages 034002.
Crossref
Portia Pusey, Mark Gondree & Zachary Peterson. (2016) The Outcomes of Cybersecurity Competitions and Implications for Underrepresented Populations. IEEE Security & Privacy 14:6, pages 90-95.
Crossref
Namik Top, Alpaslan Sahin & Kadir Almus. (2015) A Stimulating Experience. SAGE Open 5:3, pages 215824401560535.
Crossref
Marjorie Seaton, Herbert W. Marsh, Philip D. Parker, Rhonda G. Craven & Alexander S. Yeung. (2015) The Reciprocal Effects Model Revisited. Gifted Child Quarterly 59:3, pages 143-156.
Crossref
Michelle C. Muratori & Carol Klose Smith. (2015) Guiding the Talent and Career Development of the Gifted Individual. Journal of Counseling & Development 93:2, pages 173-182.
Crossref
Manabu Sumida & Atsushi Ohashi. 2015. Chemistry Education. Chemistry Education 469 488 .
Tin Lam Toh. 2015. Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Selected Regular Lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education 807 819 .
Justine Stang, Detlef Urhahne, Sabine NickIlka Parchmann. (2014) Wer kommt weiter? Vorhersage der Qualifikation zur Internationalen Biologie- und Chemie-Olympiade auf Grundlage des Leistungsmotivations-Modells von Eccles. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 28:3, pages 105-114.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.