1,255
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

, , , &
Pages 401-419 | Received 03 Feb 2016, Accepted 17 Jul 2016, Published online: 15 Nov 2016

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Gabriela Byskov Petersen, Christina Sadolin Damhus, Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson & John Brodersen. (2020) The perception gap: how the benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening are understood in information material focusing on informed choice. Health, Risk & Society 22:2, pages 177-196.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (7)

Christian Patrick Jauernik, Or Joseph Rahbek, Thomas Ploug, Volkert Siersma & John Brandt Brodersen. (2023) The impact of influences in a medical screening programme invitation: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Public Health 33:3, pages 509-514.
Crossref
Carissa Bonner, Lyndal J. Trevena, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Paul K. J. Han, Yasmina Okan, Elissa Ozanne, Ellen Peters, Daniëlle Timmermans & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher. (2021) Current Best Practice for Presenting Probabilities in Patient Decision Aids: Fundamental Principles. Medical Decision Making 41:7, pages 821-833.
Crossref
P.R. Cyr, K. Pedersen, A.L. Iyer, M.K. Bundorf, J.D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, D. Gyrd-Hansen, I.S. Kristiansen & E.A. Burger. (2021) Providing more balanced information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening: A randomized survey among US and Norwegian women. Preventive Medicine Reports 23, pages 101452.
Crossref
Gabriel Chodick, Amy E. Leader & Sharon Larson. (2021) Catch-up HPV Vaccination and Subsequent Uptake of Papanicolaou Testing in A State-mandated Health System. Cancer Prevention Research 14:4, pages 415-420.
Crossref
Or Joseph Rahbek, Christian P Jauernik, Thomas Ploug & John Brodersen. (2021) Categories of systematic influences applied to increase cancer screening participation: a literature review and analysis. European Journal of Public Health 31:1, pages 200-206.
Crossref
Yasmina Okan, Samuel G Smith & Wändi Bruine de Bruin. (2019) How is cervical cancer screening information communicated in UK websites? Cross-sectional analysis of content and quantitative presentation formats. BMJ Open 9:10, pages e029551.
Crossref
Anita L. Iyer, M. Kate Bundorf, Dorte Gyrd-Hansen, Jeremy D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, Pascale-Renée Cyr & Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen. (2019) How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened?: a randomized survey of Norwegian women. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 28:2, pages 87-95.
Crossref