3,239
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study

, , &
Pages 145-154 | Received 06 Nov 2017, Accepted 27 Feb 2019, Published online: 11 May 2019

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Sara Shamim, Yvette Lena Margareta Andresen, Henriette Vind Thaysen, Ida Hovdenak Jakobsen, Jannie Nielsen, Anne Kjaergaard Danielsen & Hanne Konradsen. (2021) Experiences of Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 14, pages 349-358.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (25)

Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny, Anne Katrine Lykke Bie, Christian Patrick Jauernik, Or Joseph Rahbek, Sigrid Brisson Nielsen, Emma Grundtvig Gram, Isabella Kindt, Volkert Siersma, Christine Winther Bang & John Brandt Brodersen. (2024) Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening—A systematic review with meta-analyses. PLOS ONE 19:3, pages e0295900.
Crossref
Gaby Sroczynski, Lára R. Hallsson, Nikolai Mühlberger, Beate Jahn, Raphael Rehms, Sabine Hoffmann, Alexander Crispin, Doris Lindoerfer, Ulrich Mansmann & Uwe Siebert. (2023) Long‐term benefits and harms of early colorectal cancer screening in German individuals with familial cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer 154:3, pages 516-529.
Crossref
Carmen E. Guerra, Prateek V. SharmaBrenda S. Castillo. (2024) Multi-Cancer Early Detection: The New Frontier in Cancer Early Detection. Annual Review of Medicine 75:1, pages 67-81.
Crossref
Suraj Pai & Neehar D. Parikh. (2024) Novel Blood-Based Biomarkers for HCC. Current Hepatology Reports 23:1, pages 174-184.
Crossref
Giovanni E. Cacciamani, Andrew Chen, Inderbir S. Gill & Andrew J. Hung. (2023) Artificial intelligence and urology: ethical considerations for urologists and patients. Nature Reviews Urology 21:1, pages 50-59.
Crossref
Upiriyasakul Rujiret, Mekhora Keerin, Pooliam Julaporn, Bhuanantanondh Petcharatana, Jalayondeja Wattana & Jalayondeja Chutima. (2023) Validity of “OfficeCheck”: A self-musculoskeletal assessment tool for screening work-related musculoskeletal disorders in office workers. Work 76:4, pages 1501-1508.
Crossref
Amir Kamel Rahimi, Moji Ghadimi, Anton H. van der Vegt, Oliver J. Canfell, Jason D. Pole, Clair Sullivan & Sally Shrapnel. (2023) Machine learning clinical prediction models for acute kidney injury: the impact of baseline creatinine on prediction efficacy. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 23:1.
Crossref
Urs A. Fichtner, Anita Arslanow, Harald Binder, Peter R. Galle, Christian Labenz, Frank Lammert, Julia Ortner, Dominikus Stelzer, Louis Velthuis & Erik Farin‐Glattacker. (2023) How do (false) positively screened patients experience a screening programme for liver cirrhosis or fibrosis in Germany? A qualitative study. Health Expectations 26:5, pages 1923-1930.
Crossref
Nathalie Wojtalewicz, Laura Vierbaum, Anne Kaufmann, Ingo Schellenberg & Stefan Holdenrieder. (2023) Longitudinal Evaluation of AFP and CEA External Proficiency Testing Reveals Need for Method Harmonization. Diagnostics 13:12, pages 2019.
Crossref
Signe Bülow Therkildsen, Pernille Thordal Larsen & Sisse Njor. (2023) Subsequent participation in organized FIT based screening following screen-derived colonoscopy – A Danish nationwide cohort study. Preventive Medicine Reports 32, pages 102125.
Crossref
Tim White & Sara Algeri. (2023) Estimating the lifetime risk of a false positive screening test result. PLOS ONE 18:2, pages e0281153.
Crossref
Ting-Yu Lin, Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu, Ling-Chun Liao, Sam Li-Sheng Chen, Han-Mo Chiu & Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen. (2023) Assessing overdiagnosis of fecal immunological test screening for colorectal cancer with a digital twin approach. npj Digital Medicine 6:1.
Crossref
Lene Musfelt Nielsen, Maria Guldbrandt Hauge, Anne S. Ersbøll, Marianne Johansen, Jesper James Linde, Peter Damm & Karoline Kragelund Nielsen. (2022) Women’s perceptions of cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 22:1.
Crossref
Susanne K. Pedersen, Benjamin L. Musher, Lawrence C. LaPointe, Melissa K. Tuck, Erin L. Symonds, Naima Loayza & Graeme P. Young. (2022) Detection of recurrent colorectal cancer with high specificity using a reporting threshold for circulating tumor DNA methylated in BCAT1 and IKZF1 . Cancer 128:10, pages 1921-1928.
Crossref
Jessica Malmqvist, Volkert Dirk Siersma, Mie Sara Hestbech, Christine Winther Bang, Dagný Rós Nicolaisdóttir & John Brodersen. (2022) Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine 27:2, pages 87-96.
Crossref
Mette Bach Larsen, Rikke Stokholm, Pia Kirkegaard, Henrik Sehested Laursen, Pernille Gabel & Berit Andersen. (2022) Making decisions on your own: Self-administered decision aids about colorectal cancer screening – A systematic review and meta-analyses. Patient Education and Counseling 105:3, pages 534-546.
Crossref
Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Reinier Meester, Lucie de Jonge, Andrea Buron, Ulrike Haug & Carlo Senore. (2021) Risk‐stratified strategies in population screening for colorectal cancer. International Journal of Cancer 150:3, pages 397-405.
Crossref
Jessica Malmqvist, Volkert Siersma, Christine Winther Bang & John Brodersen. (2021) Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire. BMC Psychology 9:1.
Crossref
Jessica Malmqvist, Volkert Siersma, Mie Sara Hestbech, Dagný Rós Nicolaisdóttir, Christine Winther Bang & John Brodersen. (2021) Psychosocial consequences of invitation to colorectal cancer screening: a matched cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 75:9, pages 867-873.
Crossref
Sara Gostoli, Maria Montecchiarini, Alessia Urgese, Francesco Ferrara, Anna Maria Polifemo, Liza Ceroni, Asia Gasparri, Chiara Rafanelli & Vincenzo Cennamo. (2021) The clinical utility of a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment in the program for colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports 11:1.
Crossref
Alexandra H. Baker, Michael C. Monuteaux, Kate Madden, Andrew J. Capraro, Marvin B. Harper & Matthew Eisenberg. (2021) Effect of a Sepsis Screening Algorithm on Care of Children with False-Positive Sepsis Alerts. The Journal of Pediatrics 231, pages 193-199.e1.
Crossref
Vilius Savickas, Emma L Veale, Sukvinder K Bhamra, Adrian J Stewart, Alistair Mathie & Sarah Corlett. (2020) Pharmacists detecting atrial fibrillation in general practice: a qualitative focus group study. BJGP Open 4:3, pages bjgpopen20X101042.
Crossref
Manuel Schultheiss, Sebastian A. Schober, Marie Lodde, Jannis Bodden, Juliane Aichele, Christina Müller-Leisse, Bernhard Renger, Franz Pfeiffer & Daniela Pfeiffer. (2020) A robust convolutional neural network for lung nodule detection in the presence of foreign bodies. Scientific Reports 10:1.
Crossref
Nina C. A. Vermeer, Maxime J. M. van der Valk, Heleen S. Snijders, Hans F. A. Vasen, Arthur Gerritsen van der Hoop, Onno R. Guicherit, Gerrit‐Jan Liefers, Cornelis J. H. van de Velde, Anne M. Stiggelbout & Koen C. M. J. Peeters. (2020) Psychological distress and quality of life following positive fecal occult blood testing in colorectal cancer screening. Psycho-Oncology 29:6, pages 1084-1091.
Crossref
Ahmed Rashid. (2019) Yonder: Dementia diagnosis, false-positive screening results, haemorrhoids, and the sexual harassment of doctors. British Journal of General Practice 69:687, pages 505-505.
Crossref