https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-4100
Citations (18)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Klaasjan Visscher. (2024) Experiencing complex stakeholder dynamics around emerging technologies: a role-play simulation. European Journal of Engineering Education 49:2, pages 370-388.
Read now
Read now
Shannon Chance. (2021) REES/AAEE special focus on ethics: introduction by guest editor, Shannon Chance. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 26:1, pages 2-6.
Read now
Read now
Rob Lawlor. (2021) Teaching engineering ethics: a dissenting voice. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 26:1, pages 38-46.
Read now
Read now
Diana Adela Martin, Eddie Conlon & Brian Bowe. (2021) Using case studies in engineering ethics education: the case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 26:1, pages 47-63.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (14)
Rita Peihua Zhang, Helen Lingard, Jack Clarke, Stefan Greuter, Lyndall Strazdins, Christine LaBond & Tinh Doan. (2024) Supportive communication between apprentices and supervisors: development of a digital role play game. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.
Crossref
Crossref
Elianne M. Gerrits, Lars S. Assen, Liesbeth Noordegraaf-Eelens, Annelien L. Bredenoord & Marc H. W. van Mil. (2023) Moral imagination as an instrument for ethics education for biomedical researchers. International Journal of Ethics Education 8:2, pages 275-289.
Crossref
Crossref
Rea Lavi & Deniz Marti. (2023) A Proposed Case-Based Learning Framework for Fostering Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Creative and Critical Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:6, pages 898-911.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew Williams, Colin Drummond & Daniela Solomon. (2023) Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards.. Board 9: Work in Progress: A Case Study in Product Liability: Promoting Student Engagement with Standards..
Edmond P. Byrne. (2023) The evolving engineer; professional accreditation sustainability criteria and societal imperatives and norms. Education for Chemical Engineers 43, pages 23-30.
Crossref
Crossref
Diana Adela Martin & Eddie Conlon. 2023. Rethinking Technology and Engineering. Rethinking Technology and Engineering
263
282
.
Diana Adela Martin & Gunter Bombaerts. (2022) Enacting socio-technical responsibility through Challenge Based Learning in an Ethics and Data Analytics course. Enacting socio-technical responsibility through Challenge Based Learning in an Ethics and Data Analytics course.
Diana Adela Martin, Christian Herzog, Kyriaki Papageorgiou & Gunter Bombaerts. 2022. The Emerald Handbook of Challenge Based Learning. The Emerald Handbook of Challenge Based Learning
251
279
.
Eddie Conlon. 2022. Engineering, Social Sciences, and the Humanities. Engineering, Social Sciences, and the Humanities
221
243
.
Diana Adela Martin, Eddie Conlon & Brian Bowe. (2021) A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 27:5.
Crossref
Crossref
Gunter Bombaerts, Karolina Doulougeri, Shelly Tsui, Erik Laes, Andreas Spahn & Diana Adela Martin. (2021) Engineering Students as Co-creators in an Ethics of Technology Course. Science and Engineering Ethics 27:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Mitsukuni YASUI. (2021) Understanding Emotional Influences through Virtual Cases in Science and Engineering Ethics Education科学技術者倫理教育における仮想事例による情感影響の理解. Journal of JSEE 69:5, pages 5_44-5_48.
Crossref
Crossref
Joseph Herkert, Jason Borenstein & Keith Miller. (2020) The Boeing 737 MAX: Lessons for Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 26:6, pages 2957-2974.
Crossref
Crossref
Goncalo Cruz & Caroline Dominguez. (2020) Engaging students, teachers, and professionals with 21st century skills: the ‘Critical Thinking Day’ proposal as an integrated model for engineering educational activities. Engaging students, teachers, and professionals with 21st century skills: the ‘Critical Thinking Day’ proposal as an integrated model for engineering educational activities.