64
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Modelling of Decontamination Rate in an Electrokinetic Soil Processing

, , &
Pages 105-121 | Received 25 Sep 1996, Accepted 25 Sep 1997, Published online: 22 Sep 2006

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (5)

K. Kada, A. Abdi, Z. Bekkar Djelloul Sayah, D. E. Akretche, S. Rafai, H. Lahmar & M. Benamira. (2023) Modeling and optimizing by the response surface methodology of the Pb(II)-removing effectiveness from a soil by electrokinetic remediation. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal 32:3, pages 305-319.
Read now
Danielle Camenzuli, Benjamin L. Freidman, Tom M. Statham, Kathryn A. Mumford & Damian B. Gore. (2013) On-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: a review. Polar Research 32:1.
Read now
Gye-Nam Kim, Byeong-Il Yang, Jei-Kwon Moon & Kune-Woo Lee. (2009) Vertical Electrokinetic-Flushing Remediation. Separation Science and Technology 44:10, pages 2354-2370.
Read now
Ramasubramania Iyer. (2001) Electrokinetic Remediation. Particulate Science and Technology 19:3, pages 219-228.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Maria Villen‐Guzman, Maria del Mar Cerrillo‐Gonzalez, Juan Manuel Paz‐Garcia & Jose Miguel Rodriguez‐Maroto. 2021. Electrokinetic Remediation for Environmental Security and Sustainability. Electrokinetic Remediation for Environmental Security and Sustainability 1 34 .
Banambono Wilfried Forogo, Guillaume Stoltz, Nathalie Touze & Stéphane Bonelli. (2020) Electrokinetic Propagation of Acid and Base Fronts in Clayey Soil: An Experimental and Numerical Study. Transport in Porous Media 134:3, pages 537-563.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Ilgook Kim, Seung-Soo Kim & Jong-Won Choi. (2016) Removal of uranium from contaminated soil using indoor electrokinetic decontamination. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 309:3, pages 1175-1181.
Crossref
Sa Wang, Shuhai Guo, Fengmei Li, Xuelian Yang, Fei Teng & Jianing Wang. (2016) Effect of alternating bioremediation and electrokinetics on the remediation of n-hexadecane-contaminated soil. Scientific Reports 6:1.
Crossref
Yee-Sern Ng, Bhaskar Sen Gupta & Mohd Ali Hashim. (2015) Effects of operating parameters on the performance of washing–electrokinetic two stage process as soil remediation method for lead removal. Separation and Purification Technology 156, pages 403-413.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Seung-soo Kim, Jei-Kwon Moon & Jae-hyuk Hyun. (2015) Removal of uranium from soil using full-sized washing electrokinetic separation equipment. Annals of Nuclear Energy 81, pages 188-195.
Crossref
Danielle Camenzuli, Benjamin L. Freidman, Tom M. Statham, Kathryn A. Mumford & Damian B. Gore. (2013) On-site and in situ remediation technologies applicable to metal-contaminated sites in Antarctica and the Arctic: a review. Polar Research 33:0.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Seung-soo Kim, Hye-Min Park, Wan-Suk Kim, Uk-Ryang Park & Jei-Kwon Moon. (2013) Cs-137 and Cs-134 removal from radioactive ash using washing–electrokinetic equipment. Annals of Nuclear Energy 57, pages 311-317.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Seung-Soo Kim, Hye-Min Park, Wan-Suk Kim, Jei-Kwon Moon & Jay-Hyeok Hyeon. (2012) Development of complex electrokinetic decontamination method for soil contaminated with uranium. Electrochimica Acta 86, pages 49-56.
Crossref
B. Fonseca, M. Pazos, T. Tavares & M. A. Sanromán. (2011) Removal of hexavalent chromium of contaminated soil by coupling electrokinetic remediation and permeable reactive biobarriers. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19:5, pages 1800-1808.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Dong-Bin Shon, Hye-Min Park, Ki-Won Lee & Un-Soo Chung. (2011) Development of pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation technology for uranium removal. Separation and Purification Technology 80:1, pages 67-72.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Seung-Soo Lee, Dong-Bin Shon, Ki-Won Lee & Un-Soo Chung. (2010) Development of pilot-scale electrokinetic remediation technology to remove 60Co and 137Cs from soil. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 16:6, pages 986-991.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Wang-Kyu Choi & Kune-Woo Lee. (2010) Decontamination of radioactive concrete using electrokinetic technology. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 40:6, pages 1209-1216.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Byeong-Il Yang, Wang-Kyu Choi, Kune-Woo Lee & Jay-Hyeok Hyeon. (2009) WASHING-ELECTROKINETIC DECONTAMINATION FOR CONCRETE CONTAMINATED WITH COBALT AND CESIUM. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 41:8, pages 1079-1086.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Byeong-IL Yang, Wang-Kyu Choi & Kune-Woo Lee. (2009) Development of vertical electrokinetic-flushing decontamination technology to remove 60Co and 137Cs from a Korean nuclear facility site. Separation and Purification Technology 68:2, pages 222-226.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Yun-Ho Jung, Jung-Joon Lee, Jei-Kwon Moon & Chong-Hun Jung. (2008) Development of electrokinetic-flushing technology for the remediation of contaminated soil around nuclear facilities. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 14:6, pages 732-738.
Crossref
Gye-Nam Kim, Yun-Ho Jung, Jung-Joon Lee, Jei-Kwon Moon & Chong-Hun Jung. (2008) An analysis of a flushing effect on the electrokinetic-flushing removal of cobalt and cesium from a soil around decommissioning site. Separation and Purification Technology 63:1, pages 116-121.
Crossref
A Kaya & Y Yukselen. (2005) Zeta potential of clay minerals and quartz contaminated by heavy metals. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 42:5, pages 1280-1289.
Crossref
Jurate Virkutyte, Mika Sillanpää & Petri Latostenmaa. (2002) Electrokinetic soil remediation — critical overview. Science of The Total Environment 289:1-3, pages 97-121.
Crossref
Mary M. PageChristopher L. Page. (2002) Electroremediation of Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering 128:3, pages 208-219.
Crossref
Tomas Vengris, Rima Binkienė & Aušra Sveikauskaitė. (2001) Electrokinetic remediation of lead‐, zinc‐ and cadmium‐contaminated soil. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 76:11, pages 1165-1170.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.