Citations (92)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (23)
Ji-Ping Jiang, Jin-Yan Hu, Yi-Bing Zhang & Xiao-Cui Yin. (2023) Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community. Interactive Learning Environments 31:10, pages 6480-6496.
Read now
Read now
Ernesto Panadero, Maryam Alqassab, Javier Fernández Ruiz & Jose Carlos Ocampo. (2023) A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48:8, pages 1053-1075.
Read now
Read now
Jeanette Carlsson Hauff & Jonas Nilsson. (2022) Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:6, pages 959-971.
Read now
Read now
Chie Adachi, Joanna Tai & Phillip Dawson. (2018) A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment. Higher Education Research & Development 37:3, pages 453-467.
Read now
Read now
Althea ArchMiller, John Fieberg, J.D. Walker & Noah Holm. (2017) Group peer assessment for summative evaluation in a graduate-level statistics course for ecologists. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:8, pages 1208-1220.
Read now
Read now
Stan van Ginkel, Judith Gulikers, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder. (2017) The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence. Studies in Higher Education 42:9, pages 1671-1685.
Read now
Read now
Stan van Ginkel, Judith Gulikers, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder. (2017) Fostering oral presentation performance: does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:6, pages 953-966.
Read now
Read now
Tony Harland, Navé Wald & Haseeb Randhawa. (2017) Student peer review: enhancing formative feedback with a rebuttal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:5, pages 801-811.
Read now
Read now
Genevieve Simpson & Julian Clifton. (2016) Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:4, pages 501-514.
Read now
Read now
Stuart Ian Boon. (2016) Increasing the uptake of peer feedback in primary school writing: findings from an action research enquiry. Education 3-13 44:2, pages 212-225.
Read now
Read now
Daniel Jeffery, Krassimir Yankulov, Alison Crerar & Kerry Ritchie. (2016) How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:1, pages 127-140.
Read now
Read now
Ian Jones & Lara Alcock. (2014) Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education 39:10, pages 1774-1787.
Read now
Read now
Raoul Mulder, Chi Baik, Ryan Naylor & Jon Pearce. (2014) How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:6, pages 657-677.
Read now
Read now
Yu-Fen Yang. (2014) Preparing language teachers for blended teaching of summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning 27:3, pages 185-206.
Read now
Read now
Jen
D. Snowball & Markus Mostert. (2013) Dancing with the devil: formative peer assessment and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development 32:4, pages 646-659.
Read now
Read now
Paul Orsmond, Stephen J. Maw, Julian R. Park, Stephen Gomez & Anne C. Crook. (2013) Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:2, pages 240-252.
Read now
Read now
Renske
A.M. de Kleijn, M.
Tim Mainhard, Paulien
C. Meijer, Albert Pilot & Mieke Brekelmans. (2012) Master's thesis supervision: relations between perceptions of the supervisor–student relationship, final grade, perceived supervisor contribution to learning and student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education 37:8, pages 925-939.
Read now
Read now
Michael
T. Buchanan & Julian Stern. (2012) Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of peer review. Journal of Education for Teaching 38:1, pages 37-49.
Read now
Read now
MichaelT. Buchanan. (2011) Peer Reviewing Preservice Teachers of Christian Higher Education. Christian Higher Education 10:5, pages 464-481.
Read now
Read now
Patricia Cartney. (2010) Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:5, pages 551-564.
Read now
Read now
Karen Badger. (2010) Peer Teaching and Review: A Model for Writing Development and Knowledge Synthesis. Social Work Education 29:1, pages 6-17.
Read now
Read now
Philip Vickerman. (2009) Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: an attempt to deepen learning?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:2, pages 221-230.
Read now
Read now
Ying‐Chih Chen & Chin‐Chung Tsai. (2009) An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46:1, pages 105-117.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (69)
Sharareh Alipour, Sina Elahimanesh, Soroush Jahanzad, Iman Mohammadi, Parimehr Morassafar, Seyed Parsa Neshaei & Mojtaba Tefagh. (2024) Improving Grading Fairness and Transparency with Decentralized Collaborative Peer Assessment. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8:CSCW1, pages 1-24.
Crossref
Crossref
Helene Zeeb, Anika Bürgermeister, Henrik Saalbach, Alexander Renkl & Inga Glogger-Frey. (2023) Effects of a digital support tool on student teachers’ knowledge about, assessment of, and feedback on self-regulated learningEffekte eines digitalen Unterstützungstools auf das Wissen über, die Einschätzung von und das Feedback zu selbstreguliertem Lernen bei angehenden Lehrkräften. Unterrichtswissenschaft 52:1, pages 93-115.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian Jones & Jodie Hunter. 2023. Illuminating and Advancing the Path for Mathematical Writing Research. Illuminating and Advancing the Path for Mathematical Writing Research
135
154
.
Iván Efraín Pazmiño Cruzatti. (2023) Percepciones de estudiantes universitarios sobre coevaluación mediante el recurso Taller de Moodle: explorando relaciones significativas. Revista Scientific 8:30, pages 82-102.
Crossref
Crossref
V. Hayashi, J. Dutra, F. Almeida, R. Arakaki, E. Midorikawa, S. Canovas, P. Cugnasca & W. Ruggiero. (2023) Implementation of PjBL With Remote Lab Enhances the Professional Skills of Engineering Students. IEEE Transactions on Education 66:4, pages 369-378.
Crossref
Crossref
Ying Zhan, Zi Yan, Zhi Hong Wan, Xiang Wang, Ye Zeng, Min Yang & Lan Yang. (2023) Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology 54:4, pages 817-835.
Crossref
Crossref
Maryam Alqassab, Jan-Willem Strijbos, Ernesto Panadero, Javier Fernández Ruiz, Matthijs Warrens & Jessica To. (2023) A Systematic Review of Peer Assessment Design Elements. Educational Psychology Review 35:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Kumaran RajaramKumaran Rajaram. 2023. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies
367
426
.
Kumaran RajaramKumaran Rajaram. 2023. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies. Learning Intelligence: Innovative and Digital Transformative Learning Strategies
217
302
.
Sam Yousefifard. 2023. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Global Perspectives on Higher Education
287
304
.
José Carlos G. Ocampo & Ernesto Panadero. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning
165
182
.
Stan van Ginkel & Bo Sichterman. 2023. The Power of Peer Learning. The Power of Peer Learning
145
163
.
Andrew Bartlett, Jessica Pace, Angela Arora & Jonathan Penm. (2022) Self-Reflection and Peer-Assessments Effect on Pharmacy Students’ Performance at Simulated Counselling Sessions. Pharmacy 11:1, pages 5.
Crossref
Crossref
Armağan Karahanoğlu. (2021) Act like a user, work like a teacher: evaluation of experience design works through peer-testing. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32:5, pages 2827-2852.
Crossref
Crossref
宏旭 赵. (2022) Research on the Implementation of “Peer Assessment” in CDIO Engineering Project. Advances in Education 12:01, pages 76-83.
Crossref
Crossref
Fatma Betül KURNAZ ADIBATMAZ. (2021) Online peer assessment in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning 4:4, pages 835-853.
Crossref
Crossref
Kamila Misiejuk & Barbara Wasson. (2021) Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A scoping review. Computers & Education 175, pages 104319.
Crossref
Crossref
Zuzana Kubincova & Kristian Kolcak. (2021) Team Assessment and Self Assessment in High School - Preliminary Results. Team Assessment and Self Assessment in High School - Preliminary Results.
Mohamed-Amine Abrache, Abdelkrim Bendou & Chihab Cherkaoui. (2021) Clustering and Combinatorial Optimization Based Approach for Learner Matching in the Context of Peer Assessment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 59:6, pages 1135-1168.
Crossref
Crossref
Elisabeth Eppler, Jan Meyer, Steffen Serowy, Karl Link, Barbara Pauk & Luis Filgueira. (2018) Enhancing Scientific Communication Skills: a Real-World Simulation in a Tertiary-Level Life Science Class Using E-Learning Technology in Biomedical Literature Perception, Reflective Review Writing on a Clinical Issue, and Self and Peer Assessments. Research in Science Education 51:2, pages 277-299.
Crossref
Crossref
Juan Jose Serrano-Aguilera, Alicia Tocino, Sergio Fortes, Cristian Martín, Pere Mercadé-Melé, Rafael Moreno-Sáez, Antonio Muñoz, Sara Palomo-Hierro & Antoni Torres. (2021) Using Peer Review for Student Performance Enhancement: Experiences in a Multidisciplinary Higher Education Setting. Education Sciences 11:2, pages 71.
Crossref
Crossref
Kumaran RajaramKumaran Rajaram. 2021. Evidence-Based Teaching for the 21st Century Classroom and Beyond. Evidence-Based Teaching for the 21st Century Classroom and Beyond
199
220
.
Lanqin ZhengLanqin Zheng. 2021. Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Data-Driven Design for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
3
17
.
Indira N. Z. Day, Wilfried Admiraal & Nadira Saab. 2021. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education
217
249
.
Stéphane Colognesi, Caroline Vassart, Benoit Blondeau & Liesje Coertjens. (2020) Formative peer assessment to enhance primary school pupils’ oral skills: Comparison of written feedback without discussion or oral feedback during a discussion. Studies in Educational Evaluation 67, pages 100917.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Friedrich. (2020) Effectiveness of class peer‐review under varied multiple review designs: A teaching method with homeschooling format. The Journal of Competency-Based Education 5:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Zachariah Beasley, Alon Friedman, Les Pieg & Paul Rosen. (2020) Leveraging Peer Feedback to Improve Visualization Education. Leveraging Peer Feedback to Improve Visualization Education.
Xiaolong Liu, Xuebai Zhang, Wei-Wen Chen & Shyan-Ming Yuan. (2020) Eye Movement Analysis of Digital Learning Content for Educational Innovation. Sustainability 12:6, pages 2518.
Crossref
Crossref
Zhiqiang Ma, Yichi Wang & Xiu Guan. (2019) Developing oral presentation skills through formative self- and peer-assessment in the context of China. Developing oral presentation skills through formative self- and peer-assessment in the context of China.
Jessica Holt. (2018) Grade-Accountable Peer Editing: Students’ Perceptions of Peer-Editing Assignments. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 74:1, pages 31-43.
Crossref
Crossref
Jason K. McDonald, Peter J. Rich & Nicholas B. Gubler. (2018) The Perceived Value of Informal, Peer Critique in the Instructional Design Studio. TechTrends 63:2, pages 149-159.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet Demir. (2017) Using online peer assessment in an Instructional Technology and Material Design course through social media. Higher Education 75:3, pages 399-414.
Crossref
Crossref
Jiangmei Yuan & ChanMin Kim. (2017) The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development 66:1, pages 25-52.
Crossref
Crossref
Bart Huisman, Wilfried Admiraal, Olga Pilli, Maarten van de Ven & Nadira Saab. (2016) Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers’ ability and authors’ essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology 49:1, pages 101-110.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan-Willem Strijbos & Astrid Wichmann. (2017) Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1, pages 1-9.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana González-Marcos, Fernando Alba-Elías & Joaquín Ordieres-Meré. 2018. Computers Supported Education. Computers Supported Education
390
403
.
Mohamed-Amine Abrache, Aimad Qazdar, Abdelkrim Bendou & Chihab Cherkaoui. 2018. Innovations in Smart Cities and Applications. Innovations in Smart Cities and Applications
276
287
.
Huy Nguyen, Wenting Xiong & Diane Litman. (2017) Iterative Design and Classroom Evaluation of Automated Formative Feedback for Improving Peer Feedback Localization. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 27:3, pages 582-622.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennie Sivenbring. (2017) Kamratrespons som formativ bedömning för lärande. Högre utbildning 7:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Jui-Jung TsaoWen-Ta TsengChaochang Wang. (2017) The Effects of Writing Anxiety and Motivation on EFL College Students’ Self-Evaluative Judgments of Corrective Feedback. Psychological Reports 120:2, pages 219-241.
Crossref
Crossref
Song A. An, Daniel A. Tillman, Meilan Zhang, William Robertson & Josefina Tinajero. (2016) Hispanic Preservice Teachers’ Peer Evaluations of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Development. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 15:4, pages 291-309.
Crossref
Crossref
Domingos Fernandes. (2016) ENSINO E AVALIAÇÃO NO ENSINO SUPERIOR: REFLEXÕES A PARTIR DA PESQUISA REALIZADA NO ÂMBITO DO PROJETO AVENA. Cadernos CEDES 36:99, pages 223-238.
Crossref
Crossref
Ying Li & Liping Chen. (2016) Peer- and self-assessment: A Case Study to Improve the Students’ Learning Ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 7:4, pages 780.
Crossref
Crossref
Caroline Moraes, Nina Michaelidou & Louise Canning. (2016) Students' Attitudes toward a Group Coursework Protocol and Peer Assessment System. Industry and Higher Education 30:2, pages 117-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Anastasios Theodoropoulos, Angeliki Antoniou & George Lepouras. (2014) Students teach students: Alternative teaching in Greek secondary education. Education and Information Technologies 21:2, pages 373-399.
Crossref
Crossref
Joonsuk Park & Kimberley Williams. (2016) The Effects of Peer- and Self-assessment on the Assessors. The Effects of Peer- and Self-assessment on the Assessors.
Yougen Lou, Zejuan Li, Ping Gong & Jianjun Liu. (2016) A Study on Guided Peer Feedback in Group Work to Improve Non-English-Majored Graduates’ English Writing in Internet-Based Language Laboratory. Open Journal of Social Sciences 04:10, pages 86-96.
Crossref
Crossref
Figen Kiliç, Gürol Yokuş, Burak Ayçiçek & Murat Boran. 2016. Developing Successful Strategies for Global Policies and Cyber Transparency in E-Learning. Developing Successful Strategies for Global Policies and Cyber Transparency in E-Learning
245
267
.
Domingos Fernandes. (2015) Pesquisa de percepções e práticas de avaliação no ensino universitário português. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional 26:63, pages 596-629.
Crossref
Crossref
Muhammet Demirbilek. (2015) Social media and peer feedback: What do students really think about using Wiki and Facebook as platforms for peer feedback?. Active Learning in Higher Education 16:3, pages 211-224.
Crossref
Crossref
Jiangmei Yuan & ChanMin Kim. (2015) Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research 52:3, pages 408-434.
Crossref
Crossref
Domingos Fernandes. (2015) Práticas de avaliação de dois professores universitários: pesquisa utilizando observações e narrativas de atividades das aulas. Educar em Revista:spe1, pages 109-135.
Crossref
Crossref
Georgouli Katerina, Filippakis Giorgos & Sgouropoulou Clio. (2014) Online peer evaluation supported by an expert system. Online peer evaluation supported by an expert system.
Raoul A Mulder, Jon M Pearce & Chi Baik. (2014) Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation. Active Learning in Higher Education 15:2, pages 157-171.
Crossref
Crossref
Barbara M. Hall. (2014) Designing Collaborative Activities to Promote Understanding and Problem-Solving. International Journal of e-Collaboration 10:2, pages 55-71.
Crossref
Crossref
Gloria Yi‐Ming Kao. (2012) Enhancing the quality of peer review by reducing student “free riding”: Peer assessment with positive interdependence. British Journal of Educational Technology 44:1, pages 112-124.
Crossref
Crossref
J. Johnson, S. Buckingham Shum, A. Willis, S. Bishop, T. Zamenopoulos, S. Swithenby, R. MacKay, Y. Merali, A. Lorincz, C. Costea, P. Bourgine, J. Louçã, A. Kapenieks, P. Kelley, S. Caird, J. Bromley, R. Deakin Crick, C. Goldspink, P. Collet, A. Carbone & D. Helbing. (2012) The FuturICT education accelerator. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214:1, pages 215-243.
Crossref
Crossref
Katerina Georgouli, Cleo Sgouropoulou, Ilias Skalkidis & Charilaos Tsetsekas. (2012) Introducing a Collaborative Peer-Evaluation Learning Model in Higher Education Programming-Based Courses. Introducing a Collaborative Peer-Evaluation Learning Model in Higher Education Programming-Based Courses.
Yu-Fen Yang & Hui-Chin Yeh. 2012. E-Portfolios and Global Diffusion. E-Portfolios and Global Diffusion
196
214
.
Steve Gove. 2012. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Immersive Interfaces: Virtual Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Immersive Interfaces: Virtual Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation
95
128
.
Chun-Tsai Wu, Szu-Ming Chung & Shao-Shiun Chang. 2011. Edutainment Technologies. Educational Games and Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Applications. Edutainment Technologies. Educational Games and Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Applications
195
203
.
Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2010) Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. The Internet and Higher Education 13:4, pages 242-247.
Crossref
Crossref
Marjo van Zundert, Dominique Sluijsmans & Jeroen van Merriënboer. (2010) Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 270-279.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan-Willem Strijbos & Dominique Sluijsmans. (2010) Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 265-269.
Crossref
Crossref
Ioannis Giannoukos, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Giorgos Mpardis, Vassilis Nikolopoulos, Vassili Loumos & Eleftherios Kayafas. 2010. Semantics in Adaptive and Personalized Services. Semantics in Adaptive and Personalized Services
109
126
.
Chin-Chung Tsai & Jyh-Chong Liang. (2007) The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science 37:3, pages 293-310.
Crossref
Crossref
Nanine A.E. van Gennip, Mien S.R. Segers & Harm H. Tillema. (2009) Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review 4:1, pages 41-54.
Crossref
Crossref
J. van der Pol, B.A.M. van den Berg, W.F. Admiraal & P.R.J. Simons. (2008) The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education 51:4, pages 1804-1817.
Crossref
Crossref
Arthur Dyevre & Wessel Wijtvliet. (2019) Can Peer Assessment Be Used to Improve Students' Writing Skills? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref