43
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Temporal density in courtroom interaction: Constraints on the recovery of past events in legal discourse

Pages 1-18 | Published online: 02 Jun 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (7)

Krisda Chaemsaithong. (2019) Deconstructing competing courtroom narratives: representation of social actors. Social Semiotics 29:2, pages 240-260.
Read now
RH Moeketsi. (2001) In Court with Dell Hymes: Implications for Courtroom Discourse and Court Interpreting. South African Journal of African Languages 21:2, pages 133-147.
Read now
Kenneth Zagacki. (1999) Spatial and temporal images in the biodiversity dispute. Quarterly Journal of Speech 85:4, pages 417-435.
Read now
N.G. Hartland. (1994) Ways of describing: Assessing, categorizing, and discourse analysis. Discourse Processes 17:3, pages 407-419.
Read now
ReginaM. Hoffman. (1992) Temporal organization as rhetorical resource. Southern Communication Journal 57:3, pages 194-204.
Read now
RonaldE. Lee. (1991) The rhetorical construction of time in Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “letter from Birmingham jail”. Southern Communication Journal 56:4, pages 279-288.
Read now
G.H. Morris & Robert Hopper. (1987) Symbolic action as alignment: A synthesis of rules approaches. Research on Language and Social Interaction 21:1-4, pages 1-29.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (13)

Karolina Gmerek. (2022) How Do Non-professional Participants of a Trial Cope with the Communication Process at the Trial? The Results of Empirical Research Conducted in Polish Courts. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 36:2, pages 791-813.
Crossref
Krisda Chaemsaithong. (2019) When grammar clashes: Negotiation of guilt and innocence in courtroom discourse. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55:1, pages 27-52.
Crossref
Krisda Chaemsaithong & Yoonjeong Kim. (2018) ‘It was him’: Representational strategies, identity, and legitimization in the Boston Marathon bombing trial narratives. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4, pages 286-310.
Crossref
Krisda Chaemsaithong. (2017) Grammatical Identities at Work: A Case Study of Courtroom Talk. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 17:4, pages 729-752.
Crossref
Magdalena Szczyrbak. (2016) Say and stancetaking in courtroom talk: a corpus-assisted study . Corpora 11:2, pages 143-168.
Crossref
Marianna Varga. (2015) Bírói kérdésfeltevések a magyar tanú- és szakértői bizonyításokban. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 2:1, pages 79-107.
Crossref
. 2012. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis 741 811 .
TERRI R. METZGER & WAYNE A. BEACH. (2016) Preserving Alternative Versions. Communication Research 23:6, pages 749-765.
Crossref
Chris Fife-Schaw. (2016) 3. The Influence of Witness Appearance and Demeanour on Witness Credibility: A Theoretical Framework. Medicine, Science and the Law 35:2, pages 107-116.
Crossref
David Bogen & Michael Lynch. (1989) Taking Account of the Hostile Native: Plausible Deniability and the Production of Conventional History in the Iran-Contra Hearings. Social Problems 36:3, pages 197-224.
Crossref
G. H. Morris. (2016) Finding Fault. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 7:1, pages 1-25.
Crossref
Augustine Brannigan & Michael Lynch. (2016) Credibility as an Interactional Accomplishment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16:2, pages 115-146.
Crossref
Paul Evangelista. 1988. Law and Semiotics. Law and Semiotics 181 192 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.