Advanced search
Publication Cover
Communication Monographs Volume 65, 1998 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
252
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Jurors' intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication injury decision making

Sunwolf Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication, Santa Clara University,
&
David R. Seibold Professor in the Department of Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara
Pages 282-307 | Published online: 02 Jun 2009

Citations (18)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (9)

David R. Seibold. (2017) A tribute to those associated with this tribute, with great gratitude. Journal of Applied Communication Research 45:4, pages 445-454.
Read now
Andrew Pilny, Marshall Scott Poole, Ashley Reichelmann & Brennan Klein. (2017) A structurational group decision-making perspective on the commons dilemma: results from an online public goods game. Journal of Applied Communication Research 45:4, pages 413-428.
Read now
Leah Sprain & John Gastil. (2013) What Does It Mean to Deliberate? An Interpretative Account of Jurors’ Expressed Deliberative Rules and Premises. Communication Quarterly 61:2, pages 151-171.
Read now
James Olumide Olufowote. (2010) Informed Consent to Treatment's Sociohistorical Discourse of Traditionalism: A Structurational Analysis of Radiology Residents' Accounts. Health Communication 25:1, pages 22-31.
Read now
Sunwolf. (2006) Decisional Regret Theory: Reducing the Anxiety About Uncertain Outcomes During Group Decision Making Through Shared Counterfactual Storytelling. Communication Studies 57:2, pages 107-134.
Read now
Laura Leets & Sunwolf. (2005) Adolescent rules for social exclusion: when is it fair to exclude someone else?. Journal of Moral Education 34:3, pages 343-362.
Read now
Steven R. Corman & Timothy Kuhn. (2005) The Detectability of Socio-Egocentric Group Speech: A Quasi-Turing Test. Communication Monographs 72:2, pages 117-143.
Read now
Ann Burnett & DianeM. Badzinski. (2000) An exploratory study of argument in the jury decision‐making process. Communication Quarterly 48:4, pages 380-396.
Read now
KennethN. Cissna. (2000) Applied communication research in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Communication Research 28:2, pages 169-173.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (9)

Robert C. Richards & Michael Neblo. (2022) Active Is as Active Does: Deliberative and Non-Deliberative Political Communication in Context. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 18:2.
Crossref
SunWolf. 2021. The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research. The Emerald Handbook of Group and Team Communication Research 443 460 .
Dennis S. Gouran. 2016. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy 1 12 .
Sun Wolf. (2010) Investigating Jury Deliberation in a Capital Murder Case. Small Group Research 41:4, pages 380-385.
Crossref
Renee A. MeyersDavid R. Seibold & Paul Kang. (2010) Examining Argument in a Naturally Occurring Jury Deliberation. Small Group Research 41:4, pages 452-473.
Crossref
John Gastil, Laura W. Black, E. Pierre Deess & Jay Leighter. (2008) From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic Attitudes. Human Communication Research 34:1, pages 137-169.
Crossref
John Gastil, Stephanie Burkhalter & Laura W. Black. (2016) Do Juries Deliberate? A Study of Deliberation, Individual Difference, and Group Member Satisfaction at a Municipal Courthouse. Small Group Research 38:3, pages 337-359.
Crossref
David R. Seibold & Renee A. Meyers. (2016) Group Argument. Small Group Research 38:3, pages 312-336.
Crossref
Lawrence R. Frey. (2016) The Symbolic-Interpretive Perspective on Group Dynamics. Small Group Research 35:3, pages 277-306.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.