6,084
Views
76
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition

Pages 270-296 | Published online: 26 Jun 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (15)

Tianyi Xing & Dale Ballucci. (2023) Cultural scripts of risk consciousness: police practices in high-risk offender management programs. Policing and Society 33:4, pages 414-428.
Read now
Guy Giguère, Tamsin Higgs & Yanick Charette. (2023) Gender Effects in Actuarial Risk Assessment: An Item Response Theory Psychometric Study of the LS/CMI. Women & Criminal Justice 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Linda J. Ashford, Benjamin L. Spivak & Stephane M. Shepherd. (2022) Racial fairness in violence risk instruments: a review of the literature. Psychology, Crime & Law 28:9, pages 911-941.
Read now
Nicole E. Frisch-Scott & Kiminori Nakamura. (2022) Time for a Change: Examining the Relationships between Recidivism-Free Time, Recidivism Risk, and Risk Assessment. Justice Quarterly 39:6, pages 1156-1179.
Read now
Stephanie J. Silverman & Esra Stephanie Kaytaz. (2022) Examining the ‘National Risk Assessment for Detention’ process: an intersectional analysis of detaining ‘dangerousness’ in Canada. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48:3, pages 693-709.
Read now
Elwin van ‘t Wout, Christian Pieringer, David Torres Irribarra, Kenzo Asahi & Pilar Larroulet. (2021) Machine learning for policing: a case study on arrests in Chile. Policing and Society 31:9, pages 1036-1050.
Read now
Carolyn McKay. (2020) Predicting risk in criminal procedure: actuarial tools, algorithms, AI and judicial decision-making. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 32:1, pages 22-39.
Read now
Eyitayo Onifade, Ashlee Barnes, Christina Campbell & Amber Mandalari. (2019) Risk assessment as a mechanism for reducing differential treatment of minorities by a juvenile justice system. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 17:3, pages 203-227.
Read now
Georgios Georgiou. (2019) Weights matter: Improving the predictive validity of risk assessments for criminal offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 58:2, pages 92-116.
Read now
Vincent Chiao. (2018) Predicting Proportionality: The Case for Algorithmic Sentencing. Criminal Justice Ethics 37:3, pages 238-261.
Read now
Anne-Laure Beaussier, David Demeritt, Alex Griffiths & Henry Rothstein. (2016) Accounting for failure: risk-based regulation and the problems of ensuring healthcare quality in the NHS. Health, Risk & Society 18:3-4, pages 205-224.
Read now
OscarH. Gandy. (2014) Choosing the Points of Entry: Strategic Framing and the Problem of Hyperincarceration. Atlantic Journal of Communication 22:1, pages 61-80.
Read now
Nancy King. (2013) Three Directions for Future Research into Sentencing Discretion. Justice Quarterly 30:2, pages 223-230.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (61)

Lucía Martínez-Garay. (2023) Evidence-based sentencing and scientific evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Liam Kennedy, Joshua D. M. Shaw & Tyler J. King. (2023) Disciplinary Paternalism and Resistance in Ontario’s Forensic Mental Health System. Critical Criminology 31:3, pages 843-858.
Crossref
Micheal P. Taylor. (2023) Sensing probation in Canada: Notes on affect and penal aesthetics in risk assessment. European Journal of Probation 15:2, pages 120-146.
Crossref
Thomas Guiney & Henry Yeomans. (2023) Explaining penal momentum: Path dependence, prison population forecasting and the persistence of high incarceration rates in England and Wales. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 62:1, pages 29-45.
Crossref
Rik Peeters. (2023) Digital Administrative Burdens: An Agenda for Analyzing the Citizen Experience of Digital Bureaucratic Encounters. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 6:1, pages 7-13.
Crossref
Darcy J. Coulter, Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan, Yong-Bin Kang, Justin S. Trounson, Thalia Anthony, Elena Marchetti & Stephane M. Shepherd. (2022) Culture, Strengths, and Risk: The Language of Pre-Sentence Reports in Indigenous Sentencing Courts and Mainstream Courts. Criminal Justice and Behavior 50:1, pages 76-100.
Crossref
Henrik Örnlind & Torbjörn Forkby. (2022) The risk–gang nexus in Sweden: Penal layering and the uneven topography of penal change. Punishment & Society, pages 146247452211321.
Crossref
Seena Fazel, Amir Sariaslan & Thomas Fanshawe. (2022) Towards a More Evidence-Based Risk Assessment for People in the Criminal Justice System: the Case of OxRec in the Netherlands. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 28:3, pages 397-406.
Crossref
Byunggu Kang & Sishi Wu. (2022) False positives vs. false negatives: public opinion on the cost ratio in criminal justice risk assessment. Journal of Experimental Criminology.
Crossref
Peter Johansson Bäckström, Maria Danielsson, Louise C. Starfelt Sutton & Dan Andersson. (2022) Evaluation of the Predictive Validity of a Risk-Need-Responsivity Assessment Tool (RNR-A) in the Swedish Prison and Probation Service. The Prison Journal 102:3, pages 367-390.
Crossref
Hilary Evans Cameron, Avi Goldfarb & Leah Morris. (2022) Artificial Intelligence for a Reduction of False Denials in Refugee Claims. Journal of Refugee Studies 35:1, pages 493-510.
Crossref
Julien Frechette & Patrick Lussier. (2022) Chaque âge a ses vertus, comme il a ses défautsAge-related biases in recidivism risk prediction within the Level of Service and Case Management InventoryCada edad tiene sus virtudes y sus defectos. Criminologie 55:2, pages 323.
Crossref
Jens O. Zinn & Patrick R. Brown. 2022. Covid-19 and the Sociology of Risk and Uncertainty. Covid-19 and the Sociology of Risk and Uncertainty 1 26 .
Dasha Pruss. (2022) Mechanical Jurisprudence and Domain Distortion: How Predictive Algorithms Warp the Law. Philosophy of Science 88:5, pages 1101-1112.
Crossref
Seth J Prins & Adam Reich. (2021) Criminogenic risk assessment: A meta-review and critical analysis. Punishment & Society 23:4, pages 578-604.
Crossref
Rhys Hester. 2021. The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice. The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice 561 567 .
Kelly Struthers Montford & Kelly Hannah-Moffat. (2021) The veneers of empiricism: Gender, race and prison classification. Aggression and Violent Behavior 59, pages 101475.
Crossref
Jenny Francis. (2018) I Am Nobody Here: Institutional Humanism and the Discourse of Disposability in the Lives of Criminalized Refugee Youth in Canada. Race and Justice 11:2, pages 226-246.
Crossref
Christopher D'Amato, Ian A. Silver, Jamie Newsome & Edward J. Latessa. (2020) Progressing policy toward a risk/need informed sanctioning model. Criminology & Public Policy 20:1, pages 41-69.
Crossref
Rik Peeters. (2020) The agency of algorithms: Understanding human-algorithm interaction in administrative decision-making. Information Polity 25:4, pages 507-522.
Crossref
Justin Bullock, Matthew M. Young & Yi-Fan Wang. (2020) Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service. Information Polity 25:4, pages 491-506.
Crossref
Vanessa Schick, Isabel Roth, Andrea Link & Alycia Welch. (2020) The nuanced relationship between adverse childhood experiences and recidivism risk scores among women leaving jail: A preliminary exploration. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 30:5, pages 221-227.
Crossref
Rhys Hester. (2020) Risk assessment savvy: The imperative of appreciating accuracy and outcome. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 38:3, pages 246-258.
Crossref
Serena QuattrocoloSerena Quattrocolo. 2020. Artificial Intelligence, Computational Modelling and Criminal Proceedings. Artificial Intelligence, Computational Modelling and Criminal Proceedings 131 180 .
Bernadette McSherry. 2020. Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt against Uncertainty. Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt against Uncertainty 17 42 .
Yoav Mehozay & Eran Fisher. (2018) The epistemology of algorithmic risk assessment and the path towards a non-penology penology . Punishment & Society 21:5, pages 523-541.
Crossref
Kelly Hannah-Moffat. (2018) Algorithmic risk governance: Big data analytics, race and information activism in criminal justice debates. Theoretical Criminology 23:4, pages 453-470.
Crossref
Stefan Vogler. (2018) Constituting the ‘sexually violent predator’: Law, forensic psychology, and the adjudication of risk. Theoretical Criminology 23:4, pages 509-526.
Crossref
Naomi Murakawa. (2019) Racial Innocence: Law, Social Science, and the Unknowing of Racism in the US Carceral State. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 15:1, pages 473-493.
Crossref
Xiaoyu Yuan. (2019) Risk, Risk Assessment, and Community Corrections in China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 63:14, pages 2466-2482.
Crossref
Tim Dekkers, Maartje van der Woude & Robert Koulish. (2018) Objectivity and accountability in migration control using risk assessment tools. European Journal of Criminology 16:2, pages 237-254.
Crossref
Jenny Francis. (2018) Human rights violations as humanist performance: Dehumanizing criminalized refugee youth in Canada. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 63:1, pages 129-144.
Crossref
Emily J. Salisbury, Jody Sundt & Breanna Boppre. (2019) Guest Editors’ Comments: Risk Assessment and Judicial Decision Making. Criminal Justice and Behavior 46:2, pages 181-184.
Crossref
Laurel Eckhouse, Kristian Lum, Cynthia Conti-Cook & Julie Ciccolini. (2018) Layers of Bias: A Unified Approach for Understanding Problems With Risk Assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 46:2, pages 185-209.
Crossref
Mona Lynch. (2019) The Narrative of the Number: Quantification in Criminal Court. Law & Social Inquiry 44:1, pages 31-57.
Crossref
Ilana Lockwood, Michele Peterson-Badali & Fred Schmidt. (2018) The Relationship Between Risk, Criminogenic Need, and Recidivism for Indigenous Justice-Involved Youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior 45:11, pages 1688-1708.
Crossref
Gil Rothschild-Elyassi, Johann Koehler & Jonathan Simon. 2018. The Handbook of Social Control. The Handbook of Social Control 194 206 .
Rik Peeters & Marc Schuilenburg. (2018) Machine justice: Governing security through the bureaucracy of algorithms. Information Polity 23:3, pages 267-280.
Crossref
Eva Fialová. (2018) Využití algoritmů při profilování v trestním řízení a důsledky pro lidská práva. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi 26:2, pages 229-258.
Crossref
Seth J Prins & Adam Reich. (2017) Can we avoid reductionism in risk reduction?. Theoretical Criminology 22:2, pages 258-278.
Crossref
Randolph R. Myers & Tim Goddard. (2016) Virtuous profits: Pay for success arrangements and the future of recidivism reduction. Punishment & Society 20:2, pages 155-173.
Crossref
Thibaut Slingeneyer. (2017) Des techniques actuarielles dans la boîte à outils foucaldienne ? Un usage « décalé » des statistiques en justice pénale pour susciter les contre-conduites. Déviance et Société Vol. 41:4, pages 541-565.
Crossref
Guy Giguère & Patrick Lussier. (2017) Une analyse des qualités psychométriques du Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) à partir de la théorie des réponses aux items . Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 59:4, pages 498-533.
Crossref
Kiminori Nakamura. (2017) Careful What You Wish For. Criminology & Public Policy 16:3, pages 1009-1016.
Crossref
Samuel E. DeWitt, Shawn D. BushwayGarima SiwachMegan C. Kurlychek. (2017) Redeemed Compared to Whom?. Criminology & Public Policy 16:3, pages 963-997.
Crossref
Jiaming Zeng, Berk Ustun & Cynthia Rudin. (2017) Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 180:3, pages 689-722.
Crossref
Alexandra Chouldechova. (2017) Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact: A Study of Bias in Recidivism Prediction Instruments. Big Data 5:2, pages 153-163.
Crossref
Tim Goddard & Randolph R Myers. (2016) Against evidence-based oppression: Marginalized youth and the politics of risk-based assessment and intervention. Theoretical Criminology 21:2, pages 151-167.
Crossref
Carina Coulacoglou & Donald H. Saklofske. 2017. Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment. Psychometrics and Psychological Assessment 405 438 .
Guy Giguère & Patrick Lussier. (2016) Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument. Journal of Criminal Justice 46, pages 207-218.
Crossref
Mazhar H. Bhutta & J. Stephen Wormith. (2015) An Examination of a Risk/Needs Assessment Instrument and Its Relation to Religiosity and Recidivism Among Probationers in a Muslim Culture. Criminal Justice and Behavior 43:2, pages 204-229.
Crossref
Kelly Hannah-Moffat. (2015) Needle in a Haystack. Criminology & Public Policy 14:1, pages 113-120.
Crossref
Sigrid van Wingerden, Johan van Wilsem & Martin Moerings. (2014) Pre-sentence reports and punishment: A quasi-experiment assessing the effects of risk-based pre-sentence reports on sentencing. European Journal of Criminology 11:6, pages 723-744.
Crossref
Virginie Gautron & Émilie Dubourg. (2014) La rationalisation des outils et méthodes d'évaluation : de l’approche clinique au jugement actuariel. Criminocorpus, revue hypermédia:4.
Crossref
Robert E. Worden, Christopher Harris & Sarah J. McLean. (2014) Risk assessment and risk management in policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 37:2, pages 239-258.
Crossref
Holly A. Wilson & Leticia Gutierrez. (2013) Does One Size Fit All?. Criminal Justice and Behavior 41:2, pages 196-219.
Crossref
Émilie Dubourg & Virginie Gautron. (2014) La rationalisation des méthodes d’évaluation des risques de récidive. Champ pénal:Vol. XI.
Crossref
Kristy Holtfreter & Katelyn A. Wattanaporn. (2013) The Transition from Prison to Community Initiative. Criminal Justice and Behavior 41:1, pages 41-57.
Crossref
Michael S. Caudy, Joseph M. Durso & Faye S. Taxman. (2013) How well do dynamic needs predict recidivism? Implications for risk assessment and risk reduction. Journal of Criminal Justice 41:6, pages 458-466.
Crossref
Shawn D. Bushway. (2013) Is There Any Logic to Using Logit. Criminology & Public Policy 12:3, pages 563-567.
Crossref
Matthew DeMichele, Megan Comfort, Shilpi Misra, Kelle Barrick & Peter Baumgartner. (2018) The Intuitive-Override Model: Nudging Judges Toward Pretrial Risk Assessment Instruments. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.