2,098
Views
75
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action

Pages 1155-1169 | Received 08 Oct 2012, Accepted 18 Mar 2013, Published online: 20 Sep 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (5)

Rena Barghusen, Claudia Sattler, Lisa Deijl, Carleen Weebers & Bettina Matzdorf. (2021) Motivations of farmers to participate in collective agri-environmental schemes: the case of Dutch agricultural collectives. Ecosystems and People 17:1, pages 539-555.
Read now
Audrey Joslin. (2020) Dividing “Above” and “Below”: Constructing Territory for Ecosystem Service Conservation in the Ecuadorian Highlands. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110:6, pages 1874-1890.
Read now
Raymond Yu Wang, Cho Nam Ng & Xiaoxing Qi. (2020) The Chinese characteristics of payments for ecosystem services: a conceptual analysis of water eco-compensation mechanisms. International Journal of Water Resources Development 36:4, pages 651-669.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (70)

Tuyet-Anh T. Le, Kelly Vodden, Jianghua Wu, Ryan Bullock & Gabriela Sabau. (2023) Payments for ecosystem services programs: A global review of contributions towards sustainability. Heliyon, pages e22361.
Crossref
Jérôme Faure, Lauriane Mouysset & Sabrina Gaba. (2023) Combining incentives with collective action to provide pollination and a bundle of ecosystem services in farmland. Ecosystem Services 63, pages 101547.
Crossref
Josef Kaiser, Tobias Krueger & Dagmar Haase. (2023) Global patterns of collective payments for ecosystem services and their degrees of commodification. Ecological Economics 209, pages 107816.
Crossref
Katharine R.E. Sims. (2023) Towards equity in land protection. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, pages 1-30.
Crossref
Yongjie Xue, Jinling Yan, Dahai Li & Haijing Zheng. (2023) Integrated Ocean Management (IOM) for Marine Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)14: A Case Study of China’s Bohai Sea. Sustainability 15:7, pages 5979.
Crossref
Hollie Booth, M. Said Ramdlan, Ayesha Hafizh, Karto Wongsopatty, Susana Mourato, Thomas Pienkowski, Luky Adrinato & E.J. Milner-Gulland. (2023) Designing locally-appropriate conservation incentives for small-scale fishers. Biological Conservation 277, pages 109821.
Crossref
Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Annika Hermann, Laura van der Lingen & Tanya Hayes. (2022) Community-based water markets and collective payment for ecosystem services: toward a theory of community-based environmental markets. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 59, pages 101221.
Crossref
Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire, Jeremy Pittman, Michael Drescher, Juan Moreno-Cruz & Andrea Olive. (2022) Governance of working landscapes: a conceptual framework. Sustainability Science 17:6, pages 2579-2596.
Crossref
Raphael Anammasiya Ayambire & Jeremy Pittman. (2022) Opening the black box between governance and management: A mechanism-based explanation of how governance affects the management of endangered species. Ambio 51:10, pages 2091-2106.
Crossref
Thomas M. Neeson, Sean M. Wineland, Erin Phillips & Jonathan McFadden. (2022) The dynamics of mature and emerging freshwater conservation programs. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10.
Crossref
Elizabeth L. Yuliani, Moira Moeliono, Ardi Labarani, Micah R. Fisher, Pisca A. Tias & Terry Sunderland. (2022) Relational values of forests: Value‐conflicts between local communities and external programmes in Sulawesi. People and Nature.
Crossref
Ira Ryski Wahyuni, Alfian Alfian, Mutmainnah Mutmainnah, La Ode Muhammad Erif & Fitria Nur Indah Djafar. (2022) Redefining Role of Stakeholders in Restoring Hydrological Function and Conservation of Biodiversity of Nipa-Nipa Grand Forest Park, Southeast Sulawesi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1065:1, pages 012049.
Crossref
Elsa T. Berthet, Vincent Bretagnolle & Sabrina Gaba. (2022) Place-based social-ecological research is crucial for designing collective management of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 55, pages 101426.
Crossref
Yuki Yoshida, Hirotaka Matsuda, Kensuke Fukushi, Kazuhiko Takeuchi & Ryugo Watanabe. (2022) The missing intangibles: nature’s contributions to human wellbeing through place attachment and social capital. Sustainability Science 17:3, pages 809-822.
Crossref
Long Chu, R. Quentin Grafton & Hai Nguyen. (2022) A global analysis of the break-even prices to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide via forest plantation and avoided deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics 135, pages 102666.
Crossref
Stefany Maca-Millán, Paola Arias-Arévalo & Lina Restrepo-Plaza. (2021) Payment for ecosystem services and motivational crowding: Experimental insights regarding the integration of plural values via non-monetary incentives. Ecosystem Services 52, pages 101375.
Crossref
Tanya Hayes, Felipe Murtinho, Hendrik Wolff, María Fernanda López-Sandoval & Joel Salazar. (2021) Effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services after loss and uncertainty of compensation. Nature Sustainability 5:1, pages 81-88.
Crossref
Sara E. Heisel, Elizabeth King, Francis Lekanta, Francis Lemoile, Camilla Ryan, Isaya Lemerketo, Siva Sundaresan, Erin Malsbury & Brett Bruyere. (2021) Assessing ecological knowledge, perceived agency, and motivations regarding wildlife and wildlife conservation in Samburu, Kenya. Biological Conservation 262, pages 109305.
Crossref
Manon Authelet, Julie Subervie, Patrick Meyfroidt, Nigel Asquith & Driss Ezzine-de-Blas. (2021) Economic, pro-social and pro-environmental factors influencing participation in an incentive-based conservation program in Bolivia. World Development 145, pages 105487.
Crossref
Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Julian Sagebiel, Jens Rommel & Roland Olschewski. (2021) Types of collective action problems and farmers’ willingness to accept agri-environmental schemes in Switzerland. Ecosystem Services 50, pages 101304.
Crossref
Maria Perevochtchikova, Ricardo Castro-Díaz, Alfonso Langle-Flores & Juan José Von Thaden Ugalde. (2021) A systematic review of scientific publications on the effects of payments for ecosystem services in Latin America, 2000–2020. Ecosystem Services 49, pages 101270.
Crossref
Ying Chai, Haoran Zhang, Yong Luo, Yi Wang & Yunmin Zeng. (2021) Payments for ecosystem services programs, institutional bricolage, and common pool resource management: Evidence from village collective-managed irrigation systems in China. Ecological Economics 182, pages 106906.
Crossref
Kelly W. Jones, Kathryn Powlen, Ryan Roberts & Xoco Shinbrot. (2020) Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services 45, pages 101159.
Crossref
Angela Caro-Borrero, Javier Carmona-Jiménez & Fernanda Figueroa. (2020) Water resources conservation and rural livelihoods in protected areas of central Mexico. Journal of Rural Studies 78, pages 12-24.
Crossref
Sintayehu Aynalem Aseres & Raminder Kaur Sira. (2020) Estimating visitors' willingness to pay for a conservation fund: sustainable financing approach in protected areas in Ethiopia. Heliyon 6:8, pages e04500.
Crossref
Bonnie Colby. (2020) Acquiring environmental flows: ecological economics of policy development in western U.S.. Ecological Economics 173, pages 106655.
Crossref
Josephine Chambers, Margarita Del Aguila Mejía, Raydith Ramírez Reátegui & Chris Sandbrook. (2019) Why joint conservation and development projects often fail: An in-depth examination in the Peruvian Amazon. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 3:2, pages 365-398.
Crossref
Kate Sherren, Wesley Tourangeau, Mhari Lamarque & Simon Greenland‐Smith. (2019) Exploring motivation crowding around farmer incentives for riparian management in Nova Scotia. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes 64:2, pages 250-265.
Crossref
Ana Carolina Oliveira Fiorini, Conner Mullally, Marilyn Swisher & Francis E. Putz. (2020) Forest cover effects of payments for ecosystem services: Evidence from an impact evaluation in Brazil. Ecological Economics 169, pages 106522.
Crossref
Audrey Joslin. (2019) Translating Water Fund Payments for Ecosystem Services in the Ecuadorian Andes. Development and Change 51:1, pages 94-116.
Crossref
Harlan Koff & Carmen Maganda. (2019) Saving the baby while discarding the bathwater: the application of policy coherence for development analysis to payment for watershed services. Madera y Bosques 25:3.
Crossref
Tanya Hayes, Tara Grillos, Leah L. Bremer, Felipe Murtinho & Elizabeth Shapiro. (2019) Collective PES: More than the sum of individual incentives. Environmental Science & Policy 102, pages 1-8.
Crossref
Alexander Pfaff, Luz A. Rodriguez & Elizabeth Shapiro-Garza. (2019) Collective Local Payments for ecosystem services: New local PES between groups, sanctions, and prior watershed trust in Mexico. Water Resources and Economics 28, pages 100136.
Crossref
Paola Ovando, Santiago Beguería & Pablo Campos. (2019) Carbon sequestration or water yield? The effect of payments for ecosystem services on forest management decisions in Mediterranean forests. Water Resources and Economics 28, pages 100119.
Crossref
Santiago Izquierdo-Tort, Fiorella Ortiz-Rosas & Paola Angélica Vázquez-Cisneros. (2019) ‘Partial’ participation in Payments for Environmental Services (PES): Land enrolment and forest loss in the Mexican Lacandona Rainforest. Land Use Policy 87, pages 103950.
Crossref
Sergio Villamayor-Tomas, Andreas Thiel, Laurence Amblard, Dimitrios Zikos & Ester Blanco. (2019) Diagnosing the role of the state for local collective action: Types of action situations and policy instruments. Environmental Science & Policy 97, pages 44-57.
Crossref
B. Tabaichount, S.L.R. Wood, C. Kermagoret, V. Kolinjivadi, J.F. Bissonnette, A. Zaga Mendez & J. Dupras. (2019) Water quality trading schemes as a form of state intervention: Two case studies of state-market hybridization from Canada and New Zealand. Ecosystem Services 36, pages 100890.
Crossref
Vijay Kolinjivadi, Simon Charré, Jan Adamowski & Nicolás Kosoy. (2019) Economic Experiments for Collective Action in the Kyrgyz Republic: Lessons for Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES). Ecological Economics 156, pages 489-498.
Crossref
Leah L Bremer, Kate A Brauman, Sara Nelson, Kelly Meza Prado, Eric Wilburn & Ana Carolina O Fiorini. (2018) Relational values in evaluations of upstream social outcomes of watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: a review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 35, pages 116-123.
Crossref
Andreas Scheba. (2018) Market-Based Conservation for Better Livelihoods? The Promises and Fallacies of REDD+ in Tanzania. Land 7:4, pages 119.
Crossref
Patrick Bottazzi, Emma Wiik, David Crespo & Julia P.G. Jones. (2018) Payment for Environmental “Self-Service”: Exploring the Links Between Farmers' Motivation and Additionality in a Conservation Incentive Programme in the Bolivian Andes. Ecological Economics 150, pages 11-23.
Crossref
Annabelle Jade Bladon, Essam Yassin Mohammed, Belayet Hossain, Golam Kibria, Liaquat Ali & E. J. Milner-Gulland. (2018) Evaluating the ecological and social targeting of a compensation scheme in Bangladesh. PLOS ONE 13:6, pages e0197809.
Crossref
N. Droste, I. Ring, R. Santos & M. Kettunen. (2018) Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Europe – Evidence-Based Design Options for a Transnational Scheme. Ecological Economics 147, pages 373-382.
Crossref
Tobias Vorlaufer, Thomas Falk, Thomas Dufhues & Michael Kirk. (2017) Payments for ecosystem services and agricultural intensification: Evidence from a choice experiment on deforestation in Zambia. Ecological Economics 141, pages 95-105.
Crossref
Alain Karsenty, Sigrid Aubert, Laura Brimont, Céline Dutilly, Sébastien Desbureaux, Driss Ezzine de Blas & Gwenole Le Velly. (2017) The Economic and Legal Sides of Additionality in Payments for Environmental Services. Environmental Policy and Governance 27:5, pages 422-435.
Crossref
Yajuan Chen, Qian Zhang, Wenping Liu & Zhenrong Yu. (2017) Analyzing Farmers’ Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and PES Schemes within Agricultural Landscapes in Mengyin County, China: Transforming Trade-Offs into Synergies. Sustainability 9:8, pages 1459.
Crossref
Henintsoa Randrianarison, Jeannot Ramiaramanana & Frank Wätzold. (2017) When to Pay? Adjusting the Timing of Payments in PES Design to the Needs of Poor Land-users. Ecological Economics 138, pages 168-177.
Crossref
Felipe Murtinho & Tanya Hayes. (2017) Communal Participation in Payment for Environmental Services (PES): Unpacking the Collective Decision to Enroll. Environmental Management 59:6, pages 939-955.
Crossref
Tanya Hayes, Felipe Murtinho & Hendrik Wolff. (2017) The Impact of Payments for Environmental Services on Communal Lands: An Analysis of the Factors Driving Household Land-Use Behavior in Ecuador. World Development 93, pages 427-446.
Crossref
Ruiqian Li, Margo van den Brink & Johan Woltjer. (2017) Market-based instruments for the governance of coastal and marine ecosystem services: An analysis based on the Chinese case. Ecosystem Services 23, pages 71-81.
Crossref
Esther Turnhout, Aarti Gupta, Janice Weatherley‐Singh, Marjanneke J. Vijge, Jessica de Koning, Ingrid J. Visseren‐Hamakers, Martin Herold & Markus Lederer. (2016) Envisioning REDD + in a post‐Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice . WIREs Climate Change 8:1.
Crossref
Abdelmohssin El Mokaddem, Sylvie Morardet, Caroline Lejars, Mohammed Rachid Doukkali & Fayçal Benchekroun. (2016) Conception d’un paiement pour services environnementaux en pâturages collectifs. Une expérimentation des choixDesign of a payment for environmental services for common rangeland management: a choice experiment approach. Économie rurale:355, pages 67-89.
Crossref
Daniela Russi, Hélène Margue, Rainer Oppermann & Clunie Keenleyside. (2016) Result-based agri-environment measures: Market-based instruments, incentives or rewards? The case of Baden-Württemberg. Land Use Policy 54, pages 69-77.
Crossref
Colas Chervier, Sarah Millet-Amrani & Philippe Méral. (2016) Les apports de l’économie institutionnelle à l’analyse des dispositifs de paiements pour services environnementaux : État des lieux et perspectivesContributions of institutional economics to analysis of payments for environmental services schemes : A literature review and some perspectives. Développement durable et territoires:Vol. 7, n°1.
Crossref
Leander Raes, Lasse Loft, Jean François Le Coq, Guido Van Huylenbroeck & Patrick Van Damme. (2016) Towards market- or command-based governance? The evolution of payments for environmental service schemes in Andean and Mesoamerican countries. Ecosystem Services 18, pages 20-32.
Crossref
Jing Li & Z. X. Zhou. (2015) Natural and human impacts on ecosystem services in Guanzhong - Tianshui economic region of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23:7, pages 6803-6815.
Crossref
Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, Marie Hrabanski & Jean-François Le Coq. 2016. Climate Change and Agriculture Worldwide. Climate Change and Agriculture Worldwide 277 288 .
Gert Van Hecken, Johan Bastiaensen & Catherine Windey. (2015) Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): Addressing the gaps in the current debate. Ecological Economics 120, pages 117-125.
Crossref
Roldan Muradian & Juan Camilo Cardenas. (2015) From market failures to collective action dilemmas: Reframing environmental governance challenges in Latin America and beyond. Ecological Economics 120, pages 358-365.
Crossref
Tanya Hayes, Felipe Murtinho & Hendrik Wolff. (2015) An institutional analysis of Payment for Environmental Services on collectively managed lands in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 118, pages 81-89.
Crossref
Arturo Balderas Torres, Douglas C. MacMillan, Margaret Skutsch & Jon C. Lovett. (2015) Reprint of ‘Yes-in-my-backyard’: Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México. Ecological Economics 117, pages 283-294.
Crossref
Nichole Torpey-Saboe, Krister Andersson, Esther Mwangi, Lauren Persha, Carl Salk & Glenn Wright. (2015) Benefit Sharing Among Local Resource Users: The Role of Property Rights. World Development 72, pages 408-418.
Crossref
Drew E. Bennett & Hannah Gosnell. (2015) Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social–ecological systems framework. Ecological Economics 116, pages 172-181.
Crossref
Octavio Tolentino, Eduardo García-Frapolli, Luciana Porter-Bolland, Isabel Ruíz-Mallén, Victoria Reyes-Garcia, María-Consuelo Sánchez-Gonzalez & María-Elena López-Méndez. (2015) Triggering Community Conservation Through the Trade of Carbon Offsets: The Case of the Ejido Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Mexico. The Journal of Environment & Development 24:2, pages 187-210.
Crossref
Benjamin Cooke & Katie Moon. (2015) Aligning ‘public good’ environmental stewardship with the landscape-scale: Adapting MBIs for private land conservation policy. Ecological Economics 114, pages 152-158.
Crossref
Florence Bétrisey & Christophe Mager. (2015) Les paiements pour services environnementaux de la Fondation Natura Bolivia entre logiques réciprocitaires, redistributives et marchandes. Revue Française de Socio-Économie n° 15:1, pages 39-58.
Crossref
Angela Caro-Borrero, Esteve Corbera, Kurt Christoph Neitzel & Lucia Almeida-Leñero. (2015) “We are the city lungs”: Payments for ecosystem services in the outskirts of Mexico City. Land Use Policy 43, pages 138-148.
Crossref
Arturo Balderas Torres, Douglas C. MacMillan, Margaret Skutsch & Jon C. Lovett. (2015) ‘Yes-in-my-backyard’: Spatial differences in the valuation of forest services and local co-benefits for carbon markets in México. Ecological Economics 109, pages 130-141.
Crossref
Adam P. Hejnowicz, David G. Raffaelli, Murray A. Rudd & Piran C.L. White. (2014) Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework. Ecosystem Services 9, pages 83-97.
Crossref
Drew E. Bennett, Hannah Gosnell, Susan Lurie & Sally Duncan. (2014) Utility engagement with payments for watershed services in the United States. Ecosystem Services 8, pages 56-64.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.